Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Wanna buy some Art?


alexgaddis
 Share

Recommended Posts

That's just crazy, I could paint that, and I'd sell it for 1/10th of that.

 

Next time you're in Houston go to the Rothko Chapel. It's free. The walls are covered with gigantic dark paintings that took him like a decade (or some ridiculously long time) to paint. Though, I have no idea what took so freakin' long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rothko (and any of th abstract expressionists) are easier to understand if you can relate to what they were trying to accomplish in the concept of tribal memory.

 

Thier work was meant to evoke a common emotional and subliminal reaction in anyone viewing it, to dredge up a certain ingrained memory of our species. Pollack did it first with cave art-type symbology, then drip painting. Rothko decided to use color to elicit an emotional response. It's success varies on the individual, I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anybody see the 60 Minutes piece on the former truck-driving woman who thinks she owns a Jackson Pollock painting that could potential be worth tens of millions of dollars, but after very close inspection by art experts it was controversally decided that it probably wasn't Pollock's work so the painting is basically worth nothing.

 

The discrepancy in the worth of the painting based upon whether or not Pollock actually painted it basically shows that modern art is crap.

 

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/03/...in2758110.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The discrepancy in the worth of the painting based upon whether or not Pollock actually painted it basically shows that modern art is crap.

 

 

what an utterly retarded statement. there have also been numerous controversies with regard to the authenticity of works attributed to more traditional artists, like rembrandt and michelangelo. convincing forgeries have targeted every style of art.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biro's fingerprint match didn't change many minds in the art world, but it was good enough for at least one art collector, who offered Teri $2 million for the painting. She said no.

 

Why didn't she take it?

 

"I know what it's worth," she argues.

 

"There would have been some people say, 'Look, $2 million. You spend $5 on this painting. You’re offered two million. Take the money and run,' some people would say," Cooper remarls.

 

"True," Teri says. "But it was not a fair offer. Be fair with me and I'll sell it."

 

"So you’re not really sure, at this point, what you would take for this painting?" Cooper asks.

 

"No. I'm not gonna let 'em steal it from me," she says.

 

So I am assuming she plans of giving the thrift store half the profit when she sells it for a "fair price"??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what an utterly retarded statement. there have also been numerous controversies with regard to the authenticity of works attributed to more traditional artists, like rembrandt and michelangelo. convincing forgeries have targeted every style of art.

 

ok, then all art is crap

 

(or rather--there are a whole lot of people that buy art who are crap)

Edited by wiegie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information