Grits and Shins Posted August 17, 2007 Author Share Posted August 17, 2007 I agree that you have to draft LT. You can always trade one of your RB's for big WR. While you will have an extra RB, somebody will have an extra WR and then you can trade straight up. If you were going to trade "straight up" why not trade down and draft the specific WR you wanted ... they were all available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montana is da Man Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 Is nobody keeping a WR? Are Harrison, Fitzgerald, Moss, TO, Boldin, Johnson all in the pool? if you drafted LT and wanted to trade him, I would command the # 1 WR on that team. I would think that those top 3 or 4 receivers aren't in the pool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 If you were going to trade "straight up" why not trade down and draft the specific WR you wanted ... they were all available. Cause you want to keep the pick and draft LT and then trade one of the other lesser RBs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.