Ursa Majoris Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 And neither has a solution for how the additional 50 million or so people will send demand and prices through the roof, and also limit access because of the increased demand. What additional 50,000,000 people? Is all of Mexico included or something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonorator Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 crap ton is making sense that makes one of us yukko. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 Forcing people to purchase health insurance (if not already covered) through the private sector is a lot different than Obama/Hillary's plan of the Federal government taking over the entire healthcare system. ...which is nothing short of lunacy and why I'm scared as freakin hell of this election. :shiver: Anyway: Huck, Romney and McCain all in low 70s for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Like Soup Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 No surprise for me: Barack Obama 79% similarity Hillary Clinton 76% similarity Mike Gravel 71% similarity Romney 59% McCain 56% Huckabee 54% This candidate has withdrawn from the election John Edwards shares a 80% similarity with your beliefs 100% God God shares a 100% similarity with your beliefs. This makes you always right. Good info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 No surprise for me either.... no candidate cracked 70%. Having said that, I doubt ant pres candidate would have gotten beter than 50% with me since Reagan. I knew McCain would be my top guy, but Obama at #2 was a surprise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
montster Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 89% mike gravel. i think i might actually BE mike gravel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 gravel= 76% clinton= 75% obama= 70% mccain= 61% huckabee= 55% romney- 54% paul= 48% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 (edited) 75% Hillary Gravel 68% Obama 65% for the record...I hate them all... Edited February 7, 2008 by Avernus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 Is Obama really mailing out statements that Hillary's health care plan will garnish people's wages? This fear tactic is old and tired and untrue. People need to read candidates plans instead of listening to spin. After the last debate the spin doctors statements were read almost word to word on CNN moments later. I know reporters and anchors are lazy but come on. Do a little reasearch and don't believe the pundits. They want a fight and drawn out battle. It's how they make money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemonKnight Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 No it doesn't...but you knew that. Senator's do not run around calling each other Congressman. The accepted nomenclature is to call it Congress when speaking of both houses at the same time. To address Senators as a US Senator and a House of Representative Congressman. The fact you tried to justify you idiocy is beyond me. And I was just kidding with you and you are trying to spin. Get a grip dude. pwnd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 I'm not big into Politics at all. However, I'm guessing that I'm a Democrat though as I was similar to Obama (75%) and Clinton (71%). Being a teacher, it was interesting to see that we shared many of the same views when it came the the issues that need to be addressed in education. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted February 7, 2008 Share Posted February 7, 2008 Is Obama really mailing out statements that Hillary's health care plan will garnish people's wages? This fear tactic is old and tired and untrue. People need to read candidates plans instead of listening to spin. After the last debate the spin doctors statements were read almost word to word on CNN moments later. I know reporters and anchors are lazy but come on. Do a little reasearch and don't believe the pundits. They want a fight and drawn out battle. It's how they make money. Ummm...Hillary herself said she would go after wages if necessary. No spin here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.