Phillyphilly Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 (edited) Edited October 29, 2020 by Phillyphilly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCajun Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 Thats alot for Cook. Any of those teams loosing alot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garion Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 10 minutes ago, Phillyphilly said: Why would you Veto this? Micheal Thomas is in the deal on one side and Cook in the deal on the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCajun Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 2 minutes ago, garion said: Why would you Veto this? Micheal Thomas is in the deal on one side and Cook in the deal on the other. I think it is more one sided then that. Your getting two 1A WR's and Fournette is about to get RB2 work. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillyphilly Posted October 29, 2020 Author Share Posted October 29, 2020 16 minutes ago, CrazyCajun said: Thats alot for Cook. Any of those teams loosing alot? Cook team is 2-5 and decimated with injuries Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCajun Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 They are not that far out of it to start throwing it. He is trying to get depth. I just think it was to one sided. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garion Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 5 minutes ago, CrazyCajun said: I think it is more one sided then that. Your getting two 1A WR's and Fournette is about to get RB2 work. But they are getting Dalvin Cook... It's much easier to replace 1A WR's than a stud RB. People just aren't trading stud RB's. Many people don't even respond to trade request for their RB1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FantasyBot Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 I don't understand why this trade, or any trade, would be vetoed. If people wanna trade, let them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillyphilly Posted October 29, 2020 Author Share Posted October 29, 2020 1 minute ago, FantasyBot said: I don't understand why this trade, or any trade, would be vetoed. If people wanna trade, let them. That’s dumb. Ever heard of collusion? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCajun Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 4 minutes ago, garion said: But they are getting Dalvin Cook... It's much easier to replace 1A WR's than a stud RB. People just aren't trading stud RB's. Many people don't even respond to trade request for their RB1. Just seems like alot to trade away for Cook. I would need to see the Cook owners team. He could be throwing it if he is giving up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCajun Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 Just now, Phillyphilly said: That’s dumb. Ever heard of collusion? Thats what im trying to see. He could be giving up and just helping a friend out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillyphilly Posted October 29, 2020 Author Share Posted October 29, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, CrazyCajun said: Just seems like alot to trade away for Cook. I would need to see the Cook owners team. He could be throwing it if he is giving up. Edited October 29, 2020 by Phillyphilly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChewyCalamari Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, CrazyCajun said: Thats what im trying to see. He could be giving up and just helping a friend out. Yeah. That's collusion lol. How is that fair for the rest of the league? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCajun Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 Whats his lineup look like? His bench is crap. 3 minutes ago, Phillyphilly said: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillyphilly Posted October 29, 2020 Author Share Posted October 29, 2020 Just now, CrazyCajun said: Whats his lineup look like? His bench is crap. My bad, just edited it. Starters should be there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillyphilly Posted October 29, 2020 Author Share Posted October 29, 2020 (edited) @Montana is da Man Edited October 29, 2020 by Phillyphilly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCajun Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 1 minute ago, Phillyphilly said: My bad, just edited it. Starters should be there. I still feel this is him tanking. Why would you trade away Cook? His bye is done and is top 5 RB. Him and Julio is the only bright spot on your team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FantasyBot Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 14 minutes ago, Phillyphilly said: That’s dumb. Ever heard of collusion? Dumb? I mean seriously. And yes I've heard of collusion, it s a word that has been thrown around alot by someone that doesn't know the meaning of it very well. What's fair to you may not be fair to someone else. Play a better game then and propose a trade with that person. This is for fun, just relax! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garion Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 3 minutes ago, CrazyCajun said: I still feel this is him tanking. Why would you trade away Cook? His bye is done and is top 5 RB. Him and Julio is the only bright spot on your team. It seems everyone been "Men in Black" mind swiped of Micheal Thomas... This guy is a stud. Micheal Thomas AND Thielen for Cook is fair. If Micheal Thomas was playing and putting up numbers of last year, I would need more than Cook for him. Cook stay hurt but good when he is on the field. But keeping him on the field is the issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillyphilly Posted October 29, 2020 Author Share Posted October 29, 2020 @League_Champion @Talbot902 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 Wait, which side is it you are saying is tanking? If the Cook side, why, it certainly looks like he is improving his lineup as he can slot Fournette into an RB spot and then have Thielen and Thomas (if ever healthy) take over for Lamb and Hasty. Seems like a lot of improvement for a team that is tanking. If it's the team trading to get Cook, we haven't seen his roster yet, so can't say about that, as if he is pretty deep/strong and Cook may be the piece to put him over the top, then it is a bit much to pay possible but if it improves him it's not completely out of line for a deal for a top (if not the top) RB in the league. Keeper league or not? I mean, if a redraft and I'm the Cook owner sitting at 2-5, this is exactly the type of deal I'm looking for to try and make a push to back into the playoffs and maybe make a run. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpkrufus Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 This is not veto worthy, almost no trade is veto worthy unless you can prove collusion and you cannot. You are only assuming collusion. It’s not even a bad trade. Why do you or anyone think they are allowed to manage other teams, it’s a joke really. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comm1 Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 (edited) Yes this should Be vetoed especially when you know they are Colluding lol no one trades their rb1 especially with a bench like that and that’s what the veto is for so yes I think it should be used Edited October 29, 2020 by Comm1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garion Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 15 minutes ago, Big Country said: Wait, which side is it you are saying is tanking? If the Cook side, why, it certainly looks like he is improving his lineup as he can slot Fournette into an RB spot and then have Thielen and Thomas (if ever healthy) take over for Lamb and Hasty. Seems like a lot of improvement for a team that is tanking. If it's the team trading to get Cook, we haven't seen his roster yet, so can't say about that, as if he is pretty deep/strong and Cook may be the piece to put him over the top, then it is a bit much to pay possible but if it improves him it's not completely out of line for a deal for a top (if not the top) RB in the league. Keeper league or not? I mean, if a redraft and I'm the Cook owner sitting at 2-5, this is exactly the type of deal I'm looking for to try and make a push to back into the playoffs and maybe make a run. I agree with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garion Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 5 minutes ago, Comm1 said: Yes this should Be vetoed especially when you know they are Colluding lol no one trades their rb1 especially with a bench like that and that’s what the veto is for so yes I think it should be used I hate when people collude but this don't seem like it's what they are doing? If he was trading Michael Thomas for Scotty Miller or Cook for Jamaal Williams, I would say yes they are colluding. But MT and Thielen for Cook seems fair until we see MT back on the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.