Talbot902 Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Phillyphilly said: @League_Champion @Talbot902 Ohhhhhh shiiiitttt I've been mentioned! I feel like I've finally made it big... All joking aside I wouldn't say veto worthy what so ever. If MT has been playing all season long and been putting up numbers like last year then I would say yes but that isn't the case. To get cook you need to give up alot for him which buddy has done. We haven't even seen the other roster yet have we? Maybe the team trading away adam and Michael have more wr depth than what we are thinking? If both players accepted then let it happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
League_Champion Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 That's an awful lot to give up for Cook but it doesn't seem void worthy, perhaps it's just someone who really needs a RB. I'd much rather be on the M. Thomas side . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillyphilly Posted October 29, 2020 Author Share Posted October 29, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Big Country said: Wait, which side is it you are saying is tanking? If the Cook side, why, it certainly looks like he is improving his lineup as he can slot Fournette into an RB spot and then have Thielen and Thomas (if ever healthy) take over for Lamb and Hasty. Seems like a lot of improvement for a team that is tanking. If it's the team trading to get Cook, we haven't seen his roster yet, so can't say about that, as if he is pretty deep/strong and Cook may be the piece to put him over the top, then it is a bit much to pay possible but if it improves him it's not completely out of line for a deal for a top (if not the top) RB in the league. Keeper league or not? I mean, if a redraft and I'm the Cook owner sitting at 2-5, this is exactly the type of deal I'm looking for to try and make a push to back into the playoffs and maybe make a run. 10 team ppr league. Thomas team seems like they’re tanking, 2-5 record. Edited October 29, 2020 by Phillyphilly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillyphilly Posted October 29, 2020 Author Share Posted October 29, 2020 @League_Champion@Talbot902 @bigcountry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillyphilly Posted October 29, 2020 Author Share Posted October 29, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talbot902 Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 5 minutes ago, Phillyphilly said: After seeing his team definitely not veto worthy. The trade helps both sides. Buddy's got no rb1 and a bunch of wrs he can start in place of Mike and adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpkrufus Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 Lol what a joke, that’s the fairest trade I’ve ever seen after you post there rosters. Team 2 is about to lose Mike Davis and is paying up for Dalvin Cook. Team 1 needs wr’s. lamb is a joke now and his flex sucks. What the issue, there is none. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garion Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 2 minutes ago, Talbot902 said: After seeing his team definitely not veto worthy. The trade helps both sides. Buddy's got no rb1 and a bunch of wrs he can start in place of Mike and adam I agree. After seeing the roster, both people benefits from the trade. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
League_Champion Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 Agree, it's totally justified. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montana is da Man Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 Not verto worthy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacAttak Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 Seriously not trying to throw shade on anyone but this post is a prime example of why both rosters should be provided up front when asking questions like this. It's lopsided but in context it makes some sense for both teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbotooslow Posted October 30, 2020 Share Posted October 30, 2020 This should not have been vetoed. No trade u less it's something Like Cook, Kamara, and Hopkins for Dalton, Gore, and Curtis Samuel should be vetoed. Sorry you don't like it but there is a consensus on fantasy football and it is: do not veto a trade unless it's 1000% lopsided. Barely any trades you see on here fit that description. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.