keggerz Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 dont worry about his rushing or return stats just receiving i say 92 receptions 1472 yards 14 TDs(i dont like the number 13) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 80 rec. 1300 yds 11 TD's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake_the_builder Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 92/1540/15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted April 13, 2006 Author Share Posted April 13, 2006 the more i look at his 2003 stats i think my 92 could still be low even with key in the mix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat Face Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 (edited) 88 rec. 1300 yds. 9 TD Edited April 14, 2006 by Meat Face Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 (edited) 8 rec.1300 yds. 9 TD 1419706[/snapback] Soooo, he's gonna take 8 receptions - each of them to the house - for (on average) 80 yards each, do a U-turn, run another (on average) 80 yards in the other direction, and score his 9th TD against his own team? I like it! EDIT: Rats. You caught the typo. Edited April 14, 2006 by yo mama Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 92 receptions1472 yards 14 TDs(i dont like the number 13) 1419503[/snapback] sounds about right to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 I just personally don't think they will be throwing as much this year... I see them drafting a RB to help out...plus their DL is actually better...I see their defense playing real well and running alot.... but Smith will get his and will do better than the 80 receptions I have projected...I always set expectations lower than I expect... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Who do you pick before Smith? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yitbos69 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Who do you pick before Smith? 1419974[/snapback] CJ Harrison TO Holt Fitz Smith Bottom line I think ALL of the above WR will put up Big #'s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cliaz Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 smith will have 82/1250/8-10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Who do you pick before Smith? 1419974[/snapback] I don't really look at the draft like that.... by the time I go for a WR...I just see who is available and it won't be him... with all of the movement taking place this offseason, there are a lot of questions... even at TE...Gates has Rivers who might keep his value at a premium because he's a safety valve...or just go down due to him not being used to seeing the coverages and whatnot... I'd like to draft a TE before a WR...but this pretty much puts the kaibosh on that... my #3 pick will be the most difficult as I've had bad luck with taking a WR early....even 2 years ago I took Harrison and that was the 1st year his production dropped....but he had more explosive games overall.... yet I still had Walker and AJohnson/Boldin late....and some other good WR that I can't think of... I think this is the year of Fitz/RWilliams/AJohnson/Chambers and maybe Reggie Brown as there really nobody else to explode other than Westy or LJ in philly... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Illiniwek Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 85/1200/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentastic Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 80 rec.1300 yds 11 TD's 1419504[/snapback] I'd bump the receptions up to 90+ but other than that, I say right on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 I'd bump the receptions up to 90+ but other than that, I say right on. 1420584[/snapback] agreed....I said in another post that I shortchanged him as I set expectations to gauge what I can easily expect from a player... he likely will loom around 100 catches...but I never set the bar that high off one year of reaching that plateau... not that he can't or won't...it's just how I gauge value... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentastic Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 agreed....I said in another post that I shortchanged him as I set expectations to gauge what I can easily expect from a player... he likely will loom around 100 catches...but I never set the bar that high off one year of reaching that plateau... not that he can't or won't...it's just how I gauge value... 1420605[/snapback] Yeah, I do the same thing. Better to under value and pleasantly surprised than to do the opposite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 Yeah, I do the same thing. Better to under value and pleasantly surprised than to do the opposite. 1420608[/snapback] exactly...I have a very strict philosophy on draft day and I haven't been burned yet *crosses fingers on both hands tightly* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentastic Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 exactly...I have a very strict philosophy on draft day and I haven't been burned yet *crosses fingers on both hands tightly* 1420617[/snapback] Would you mind sharing via this thread or PM? I have a philosophy, but I waver on the discipline of it. I always seem to agree with your thoughts and ideas, so I'm interested in your strict philosophy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 90 1400 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ts Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 89/1405/11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
major-tom Posted April 16, 2006 Share Posted April 16, 2006 95/1450/13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 8, 2007 Author Share Posted February 8, 2007 (edited) Well I was WRONG smith ended with 83/1166 with 8TDs but remember he did miss the 1st 2 games of the year and had Chris Fn Weinke chucking the rock for 3 out of the last 4 games(10 catches 123yrds with a backup) Smitty very easily could have ended up in the 100 catch range and 1400+ yrds with 16 games this yr next yr you might be able to get him at a bit of a bargain but remember last yrs stats dont show exactly how productive he really was edit: i guess for the most part Key didnt really hurt Smith (key went for 70/815 4TDs) Edited February 8, 2007 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted February 8, 2007 Share Posted February 8, 2007 Well I was WRONG smith ended with 83/1166 with 8TDs but remember he did miss the 1st 2 games of the year and had Chris Fn Weinke chucking the rock for 3 out of the last 4 games(10 catches 123yrds with a backup) Glad he did but Zooty wasn't too happy about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.