The Rambler Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Quck note to all you Indy Homers... How serious is Dallas Clarks concusion? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 (edited) Word is he will return to practice tomorrow and should play on Sunday. I will have a post later this week detailing it, but the Colts TE's usually score against Jacksonville. Edited September 14, 2005 by CaptainHook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 That is good news...looking forward to that. Thanks Captain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trots Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 6 foot 2, roughly 245 lbs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soopanuts Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Did Clark practice today? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Did Clark practice today? 990075[/snapback] Yes. Although still listed as questionable on the early injury report, he practiced and said he will definitely play against Jacksonville. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skrappy1 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Good to know, thanks Hook. Dude just dropped him in one of my leagues...I already have Gonzo, but goodbye Chris Cooley, hello Dallas Clark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Yes. Although still listed as questionable on the early injury report, he practiced and said he will definitely play against Jacksonville. 990271[/snapback] Captain - probably belongs in the advice forum, but since we're on the topic... I can start Clark or a WR. WRs include: Lelie, Muhammed and Stokley. Lelie's a must-start, and I'm leaning towards going with Stokley. Can't decide whether or not to sit Muhammed for Clark or not. Two lower-rung Colt receivers starting the same week? Hmmm... Color me perplexed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 (edited) Captain - probably belongs in the advice forum, but since we're on the topic... I can start Clark or a WR. WRs include: Lelie, Muhammed and Stokley. Lelie's a must-start, and I'm leaning towards going with Stokley. Can't decide whether or not to sit Muhammed for Clark or not. Two lower-rung Colt receivers starting the same week? Hmmm... Color me perplexed. 990284[/snapback] I think Stokley would be your better start. Manning obviously is still going to use him a lot. He was the leading receiver against Baltimore in Week 1 with 7 catches for 83 yards. While I think the odds of Dallas scoring are very good, Stokley will most likely have more catches and yards. edit: Oops. Didn't read your question carefully enough. I would start Clark over Muhammad as well. Edited September 14, 2005 by CaptainHook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 I think Stokley would be your better start. Manning obviously is still going to use him a lot. He was the leading receiver against Baltimore in Week 1 with 7 catches for 83 yards. While I think the odds of Dallas scoring are very good, Stokley will most likely have more catches and yards. 990320[/snapback] Thanks, I'll stick with that... I have Gonzo in this league, too. Can start up to 2 TEs, 1 in lieu of a WR... looking to trade one of my TEs for a WR upgrade... Thanks again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Thanks, I'll stick with that... I have Gonzo in this league, too. Can start up to 2 TEs, 1 in lieu of a WR... looking to trade one of my TEs for a WR upgrade... Thanks again. 990323[/snapback] Wrong forum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerz Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Good to know, thanks Hook. Dude just dropped him in one of my leagues...I already have Gonzo, but goodbye Chris Cooley, hello Dallas Clark. 990281[/snapback] Why would ANYONE drop Dallas Clark unless they have Gates or maybe Crumpler?? Bad move, IMO!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Captain - probably belongs in the advice forum, but since we're on the topic... I can start Clark or a WR. WRs include: Lelie, Muhammed and Stokley. Lelie's a must-start, and I'm leaning towards going with Stokley. Can't decide whether or not to sit Muhammed for Clark or not. Two lower-rung Colt receivers starting the same week? Hmmm... Color me perplexed. 990284[/snapback] Wrong forum 990345[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H8tank Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Clark will be called a BUST by season end, maybe by week 3. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerz Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Clark will be called a BUST by season end, maybe by week 3. 990376[/snapback] Unless he's got a case of the "drops", it would be tough to call any receiver on the Colts a "bust" when he's got Peyton throwing to him. Manning is just too good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Unless he's got a case of the "drops", it would be tough to call any receiver on the Colts a "bust" when he's got Peyton throwing to him. Manning is just too good. 990387[/snapback] agreed, but how can you succeed when you are constantly injured?...i still can't call him a bust no matter what happens this season.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 (edited) agreed, but how can you succeed when you are constantly injured?...i still can't call him a bust no matter what happens this season.. 990409[/snapback] Injuries are definitely a concern with Clark. The only way I can see him being a "bust" is if he continues to get injured. In his rookie year, he broke his leg against NE and missed the final four games of the year. He also missed a couple weeks with hamstring injuries (I think) earlier that same year. Last year he only missed one game due to a strained calf. This year, he has missed one game (so far) with a concussion. Edited September 14, 2005 by CaptainHook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted September 14, 2005 Share Posted September 14, 2005 Injuries are definitely a concern with Clark. The only way I can see him being a "bust" is if he continues to get injured. In his rookie year, he broke his leg against NE and missed the final four games of the year. He also missed a couple weeks with hamstring injuries (I think) earlier that same year. Last year he only missed one game due to a strained calf. This year, he has missed one game (so far) with a concussion. 990435[/snapback] yea, I hear more about him being injured than him making plays... hopefully he'll do better as I have him on my roster but I've picked up Troupe and Watson in case I want to trade him in a package deal to upgrade at WR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skrappy1 Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 Why would ANYONE drop Dallas Clark unless they have Gates or maybe Crumpler?? Bad move, IMO!!! 990363[/snapback] Not sure myself, maybe he's skeptical of Clark because of his injuries and past inconsistency when Pollard was still there. He dropped Clark and picked up Chris Baker and his other TE is Heath Miller. I agree it was a bad move, but I'll gladly upgrade my backup TE from Cooley to Clark because of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10g_DBA Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 Not sure myself, maybe he's skeptical of Clark because of his injuries and past inconsistency when Pollard was still there. He dropped Clark and picked up Chris Baker and his other TE is Heath Miller. I agree it was a bad move, but I'll gladly upgrade my backup TE from Cooley to Clark because of it. 990473[/snapback] Maybe for a Gonzo owner, Clark ain't the best. Check the bye weeks man. doh! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skrappy1 Posted September 15, 2005 Share Posted September 15, 2005 Maybe for a Gonzo owner, Clark ain't the best. Check the bye weeks man. doh! 992999[/snapback] Maybe you should check them again: Gonzo and the Chiefs = Week 5 Clark and the Colts = Week 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.