fballfreak Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 This question goes out to Jackson owners. Do any of you have Marshall Faulk on your team in case Jackson pulls up lame? I'm thinking about acquiring him off the waiver as insurance. Just curious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steeler Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I'm not a Jackson owner, but I do have Faulk in a PPR league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_bone65 Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 This question goes out to Jackson owners. Do any of you have Marshall Faulk on your team in case Jackson pulls up lame? I'm thinking about acquiring him off the waiver as insurance. Just curious. 1026797[/snapback] Why yes I do I got him in the 15th round of a 16 round draft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
51Butkus Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 Strictly an insurance policy if things go wrong, injury, or Martz just ruins SJax. And who knows, later in the season, he may be a viable fill in for a week, but his best days are behind him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I'm not a Jackson owner, but I do have Faulk in a PPR league. 1026803[/snapback] same as steeler and in another league i have jax .and dont have faulk fwiw in both leagues i am 3-0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yankeelady15 Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I've got both - I always try and handcuff one player and he's the one I was the least sure about.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmoore Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 have both...hope I don't need Faulk too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Pimp Posted September 28, 2005 Share Posted September 28, 2005 I have both and will hang onto Faulk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTed46 Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I think he should be the starter...but thats me. I do not have him cuz of S Jackson there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balzac Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Rams | S. Jackson Has Chest Injury; Faulk Ready to Start if Needed Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:46:41 -0700 St. Louis Rams RB Steven Jackson (chest) is actually troubled by a chest injury in the sternum area, not by the bruised ribs the team originally thought. He did not practice Wednesday, Sept. 28 and is listed as questionable for the team's Week 4 game. After the team's Week 3 game, Jackson told reporters he would be fine for Week 4, but the outlook has changed. Right now, he is no sure thing to play and if he does not play, RB Marshall Faulk would start in his place. http://www.kffl.com/hotw/NFL?page=1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomfin2000 Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I picked up Faulk when Jackson left the game Sunday but had to release him earlier this week due to bye week issues. I may try to pick him up again after Sunday's game, but if it starts looking like Jackson isn't going to play this weekend, the other league members will be on him like white on rice. That's okay, though. Faulk hasn't shown me much the past two years, and if I'm going to burn a roster spot on an insurance policy, I'd rather back up LT with Micheal Turner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boilerduff Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I have Jackson and Had faulk, but traded him as a throw away in a trade last week... ooops. I replaced him with Ahman, but that may not be so great.... who knows! Maybe Chris Brown will explode this week... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chawk Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I thought Darren Sproles was the main man now behind LT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I thought Darren Sproles was the main man now behind LT. 1030976[/snapback] Sproles appears to be the designated change of pace back.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fballfreak Posted September 29, 2005 Author Share Posted September 29, 2005 I snooze I loose someone else grabbed him last night. Arghhhh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Jackson will play...but how limited will he be?....I just heard this on NFL Network... if you own faulk and not jackson, this is great news as he could easily make this worse....not that you should wish for injuries or anything... that's another post for another day....before this one at that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I have Faulk and S. Jax in one league and Faulk solo in another.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomfin2000 Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 Jackson will play...but how limited will he be?....I just heard this on NFL Network... if you own faulk and not jackson, this is great news as he could easily make this worse....not that you should wish for injuries or anything... that's another post for another day....before this one at that... 1032194[/snapback] I'm saying this as a guy that owns Jackson but not Faulk (yet) and was even going to start Jackson this week before news of the sternum injury broke: Just let him sit for crying out loud! You've got Faulk and Arleen Harris (who has played very well when called upon) and you throw the ball 50 friggin' times anyway. Why risk doing more damage?!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted September 29, 2005 Share Posted September 29, 2005 I'm saying this as a guy that owns Jackson but not Faulk (yet) and was even going to start Jackson this week before news of the sternum injury broke: Just let him sit for crying out loud! You've got Faulk and Arleen Harris (who has played very well when called upon) and you throw the ball 50 friggin' times anyway. Why risk doing more damage?!? 1032246[/snapback] exactly...and faulk seems to do more damage in the passing game anyways and appears worth more than SJax in a PPR league... at least in the short term...but if SJAX is already falling apart...what's his durability looking like then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.