Avernus Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 (edited) the scoring is as listed... RB: 1 point per reception 2 pts per 10 rec/pass yds (10 pt bonus at 100) 1 pt per 10 rush yds (5 pt bonus at 100) 6-9 pts per rush TD (pending on the distance) 9-12 pts per rec/pass TD (pending on the distance) WR: 1 pt per reception 1 pt per 10 rec yds (5 pts at 100) 2 pts per 10 rush/pass yds (10 pts at 100) 6-9 pts per rec TD (distance pending) 9-12 pts per rush/pass TD (distance pending) my roster QB: Favre, Collins RB: Edge, Jordan, Pittman, Pass, M anderson, T bell WR: T Holt, K Curtis, T Taylor, P Price TE: Troupe, Da. Clark his roster QB: Delhomme, Martin, Volek RB: Perry, M faulk, Benson, R Williams WR: CJ, Horn, Randle El, B Jones, K Colbert, J Porter TE: Gonzo, Witten he'll likely do this trade as I've talked to him about it, he's weighing out his options....but I want to know if it's fair enough for people not to complain as we've had people complaining about trades....I don't want any grief from this M Anderson and T bell for CJ what are your .02 and yes, I will be putting up my thread tomorrow....or right now even.... Edited October 27, 2005 by Avernus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted October 27, 2005 Author Share Posted October 27, 2005 bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehype Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Sounds good to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperBalla Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 You have to do it...yer receivers blow right now. Especially with Holt...really hurt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cherni Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 It's about as fair as a trade can be. If anyone complains they're nuts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RavenFeeder Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 That seems reasonable to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosGatosEnFuegos Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 I wouldn't give it a second glance in my league. It's clearly beneficial for both teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Youre Going Down Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Completely fair, he gets a RB he can start and you get a top notch WR. Both teams win on this trade because each team will score more points than before (particular yours). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutrun Jellies Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 With his trash bag of RB's, he may likely end up starting BOTH Denver backs that you trade him -- I think it's a great deal given the respective rosters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle2003 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 I would go 1 step further and try to trade Curtis for one of his TEs. Hopefully Holt will come back soon and you will not be playing him anyway! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhoops Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 With his trash bag of RB's, he may likely end up starting BOTH Denver backs that you trade him -- I think it's a great deal given the respective rosters. 1100671[/snapback] I like it as well!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted October 27, 2005 Author Share Posted October 27, 2005 I would go 1 step further and try to trade Curtis for one of his TEs. Hopefully Holt will come back soon and you will not be playing him anyway! 1100894[/snapback] wouldn't that leave me depleted at WR, though?..... but then again, after CJ and Holt...does it matter? maybe throw in a TE and Curtis for Gonzo and one of his other WR's.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rew70 Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 I think this reasonable and fair. No one should complain. The trade enables both teams to be stronger and fills needs for both owners. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantasyfanatic Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 It addresses both teams needs and should be viewed more then fair. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted October 27, 2005 Share Posted October 27, 2005 Looks good for both teams Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.