darin3 Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 Ummmmmm... see sigline for complete team. Graduated TD scores, based on yardage. Bonus for 300+. Bonus for QB rushing/receiving TDs. Garrard should have a ton of rushing yards, and there's the chance of a rushing TD, which is hugh. I only seeing him with 200 passing yards, if that. There's always the chance for garbage time, which could prove fruitful to his fantasy output. McMahon looked terrible 2 weeks ago and even worse last week. This, after 3 weeks ago looking darn good ... against this week's opponent, the New York Giants. Like Garrard, he can run. He has limited talent at WR, but has a solid TE. I'm tempted to give McMahon a shot, but think that Garrard is probably the safer play. What do y'all think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gdawg Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 McMahon is just awful. Not MNF awful, but awful nontheless. Gerrard is the better play I think, at least he has some weapons! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splotchman Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 Darin - I like Garrard any day over either the Eagles QB. At least you know that Garrard is gonna play the whole game, whereas McMahon could get replaced after the first series if he throws another INT that is returned for a TD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 Darin - I like Garrard any day over either the Eagles QB. At least you know that Garrard is gonna play the whole game, whereas McMahon could get replaced after the first series if he throws another INT that is returned for a TD. 1202421[/snapback] Very good call... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hated-By-Many Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 who gives a darn ..another dumb thread for darin3 the nancyboy..now i think u and johny r the same person Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chires Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 Go with garrard. Mcmahon is on a very short leash and the offense just lost their only remainig weapon in westbrook. I would not have any Eagles starting for the rest of the year other than their D or maybe Akers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 come on darin! i know you know your Athenae. this is an easy one garrard especially with his upcoming sched. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 who gives a darn ..another dumb thread for darin3 the nancyboy..now i think u and johny r the same person 1202471[/snapback] You have serious issues, Mr. OIA. Seek mental/emotional help. Really. Go with garrard. Mcmahon is on a very short leash and the offense just lost their only remainig weapon in westbrook. I would not have any Eagles starting for the rest of the year other than their D or maybe Akers. 1202482[/snapback] True about the short leash. Thought McMahon may be passing even MORE with Westbrook shelved. Plus, McMahon fared well against the G-men at the Meadowlands. come on darin! i know you know your Athenae. this is an easy one garrard especially with his upcoming sched. 1202512[/snapback] That's exactly why I picked him up (instead of Fitzpatrick, for one). But this week's gonna be tough. I was 90% sure I was going to start Garrard. Just wanted some opinions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolverines Fan Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 Garrard is the safer pick of the two. By the way, how did you end up in this situation? Did you lose Culpepper, Bulger or Lefty? Or did you draft Favre? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 Garrard is the safer pick of the two. By the way, how did you end up in this situation? Did you lose Culpepper, Bulger or Lefty? Or did you draft Favre? 1202574[/snapback] Bulger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skrappy1 Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 Garrard is the safer pick of the two. 1202574[/snapback] I'd have to agree Darin. Neither choice is too pretty, but of the two I'd go with Garrard. Did you see Monday night's game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.