Randall Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 What's sad about Coulter is the kind of deep hatred for huge groups of people she ties into. Sure she's in it for the money, but a very large group of americans actually believe the crap she spews. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spain Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 What's sad about Al Gore, Al Sharpton, Hillary Clinton, et al is the kind of deep hatred for huge groups of people she ties into. Sure they are in it for the money, but a very large group of americans actually believe the crap they spew. fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaumont Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 fixed Spain, what kind of deep hatred do Gore and Hillary Clinton tie into? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spain Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 Spain, what kind of deep hatred do Gore and Hillary Clinton tie into? You are kidding, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Note her comment: "you go into rehab" if you use the word. This is a clear tip to the Michael Richards doing rehab after his flying off the handle with the n bombs. Seems to me she wanted to say something about Obama, but somehow lacked the spine so switched to Edwards instead. But to equate her clear hate with things that Gore or Hillary does is pure bs. Sharpton on the other hand...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Yes, like calling people who belong to CPAC mindless and prejudiced... Well, aren't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Ann Coulter should stay home and cook the dinner. The husband comes home after a hard day at work and sits down at the table. He waits to be fed by Ann Coulter. First she would have to take his shoes off and rub his feet. Wouldn't she be just the perfect little thing for a wife? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Ann Coulter should stay home and cook the dinner. The husband comes home after a hard day at work and sits down at the table. He waits to be fed by Ann Coulter. First she would have to take his shoes off and rub his feet. Wouldn't she be just the perfect little thing for a wife? Well, except for her adam's apple. Given how often she likes to call dem candidates gay, methinks she doth protest too much..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargerz Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Well, except for her adam's apple. Yep, it's impressive. Whenever I see video of her, it's all I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 You are kidding, right? No. What examples do you have of either Clinton or Gore demonstrating hate? Don't bother sidetracking to Sharpton, Jackson et al - we all know they are a pair of dildoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spain Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 No. What examples do you have of either Clinton or Gore demonstrating hate? Don't bother sidetracking to Sharpton, Jackson et al - we all know they are a pair of dildoes. They use hate/fear the EXACT same way that assholios like Coulter do, but since you lefties agree with them, you dont see their hate/fear mongering. That is what pols do. The left hates big business so they play on that hate, by demonizing everybody from Walmart to Exxon. They hate pro-lifers, so they play on the fears that a womans right to choose will be taken away by these narrow minded bigots. They hate "the rich" whatever that means, so they continually attempt to divide us by using class warfare mantra. They hate people who dont accept any sort of lifestyle as normal, so they call them bigots or play the race/sex orientation/gender card at every opportunity. Pols demonize people that are on "the other side". It is based on hate/fear. And the liberals do it just as effectively as the conservatives. So get off your elitest high horses ladies, you might run out of oxygen up there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 They use hate/fear the EXACT same way that assholios like Coulter do, but since you lefties agree with them, you dont see their hate/fear mongering. That is what pols do. The left hates big business so they play on that hate, by demonizing everybody from Walmart to Exxon. They hate pro-lifers, so they play on the fears that a womans right to choose will be taken away by these narrow minded bigots. They hate "the rich" whatever that means, so they continually attempt to divide us by using class warfare mantra. They hate people who dont accept any sort of lifestyle as normal, so they call them bigots or play the race/sex orientation/gender card at every opportunity. Pols demonize people that are on "the other side". It is based on hate/fear. And the liberals do it just as effectively as the conservatives. So get off your elitest high horses ladies, you might run out of oxygen up there. That isn't the same as referring to someone as a faggot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spain Posted March 4, 2007 Author Share Posted March 4, 2007 That isn't the same as referring to someone as a faggot. In many cases, it is actually much, much worse and dangerous than using a non-politically correct term like faggot... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 They use hate/fear the EXACT same way that assholios like Coulter do, but since you lefties agree with them, you dont see their hate/fear mongering. That is what pols do. The left hates big business so they play on that hate, by demonizing everybody from Walmart to Exxon. They hate pro-lifers, so they play on the fears that a womans right to choose will be taken away by these narrow minded bigots. They hate "the rich" whatever that means, so they continually attempt to divide us by using class warfare mantra. They hate people who dont accept any sort of lifestyle as normal, so they call them bigots or play the race/sex orientation/gender card at every opportunity. Pols demonize people that are on "the other side". It is based on hate/fear. And the liberals do it just as effectively as the conservatives. So get off your elitest high horses ladies, you might run out of oxygen up there. None of this is specific to Gore or Clinton. You should perhaps go look up what "hate" really is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Gotta go with ursa on this one , espana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 In many cases, it is actually much, much worse and dangerous than using a non-politically correct term like faggot... Those you mention Clinton attacking are obtuse structures of indefinite description....big business, pro-lifers, the rich....and also institutions/groups who administer CONTROL over the populace in one way or another (or many ways even). That is nowhere near the same ballpark using a derogatory word towards a political opponent. Hopefully this finally shuts this ugly dog up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Comparing Gore and Clinton to this woman is not an even playing field..Shes a hack that sells books and doesnt have much to lose..Using the term Faggot would be career suicide for Gore and Clinton..They arent that stupid . I really dont believe hardly anything any of these people say..Some of them are just better and more tactful at delivering the bullchit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sox Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 That isn't the same as referring to someone as a faggot. I don't see how Edwards could get too upset over this...especially after his smug comment to Cheney during the debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spain Posted March 5, 2007 Author Share Posted March 5, 2007 I don't see how Edwards could get too upset over this...especially after his smug comment to Cheney during the debate. Oh I forgot about that hateful comment. Edwards went out of his way in a national debate to make sure everyone knew that Cheneys daughter was a faggot. He did so to play into the "hatred" you ladies were so sure was only something the Republitards play too. You have some splainin to do Lucy.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 Oh I forgot about that hateful comment. Edwards went out of his way in a national debate to make sure everyone knew that Cheneys daughter was a faggot. He did so to play into the "hatred" you ladies were so sure was only something the Republitards play too. You have some splainin to do Lucy.... Rubbish. He brought Cheney's daughter into the debate - and remember that she'd outed herself some time previously (and why was that ) - due to the Repugnitards constantly using gay marriage as a fear stick to beat their frightened sheep with (ooh, ooh, the end of the world as we know it). It is perfectly legitimate to point out a dichotomy between the potential (and actual) VP having a gay kid and the general 'Tard gay-bashing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 I don't see how Edwards could get too upset over this...especially after his smug comment to Cheney during the debate. Oh I forgot about that hateful comment. Edwards went out of his way in a national debate to make sure everyone knew that Cheneys daughter was a faggot. He did so to play into the "hatred" you ladies were so sure was only something the Republitards play too. You have some splainin to do Lucy.... "I think the vice president and his wife love their daughter. I think they love her very much. And you can't have anything but respect for the fact that they're willing to talk about the fact that they have a gay daughter, the fact that they embrace her." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 They use hate/fear the EXACT same way that assholios like Coulter do, but since you lefties agree with them, you dont see their hate/fear mongering. That is what pols do. The left hates big business so they play on that hate, by demonizing everybody from Walmart to Exxon. They hate pro-lifers, so they play on the fears that a womans right to choose will be taken away by these narrow minded bigots. They hate "the rich" whatever that means, so they continually attempt to divide us by using class warfare mantra. They hate people who dont accept any sort of lifestyle as normal, so they call them bigots or play the race/sex orientation/gender card at every opportunity. Pols demonize people that are on "the other side". It is based on hate/fear. And the liberals do it just as effectively as the conservatives. So get off your elitest high horses ladies, you might run out of oxygen up there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spain Posted March 5, 2007 Author Share Posted March 5, 2007 "I think the vice president and his wife love their daughter. I think they love her very much. And you can't have anything but respect for the fact that they're willing to talk about the fact that they have a gay daughter, the fact that they embrace her." That is called "outing". It was calculated and done on national television. And the purpose it was done, was to play on the same hatred and fears that you guys were accusing Horse Face Coulter of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 That is called "outing". That is called a lie. You are trundling out the same old crap you've been fed by your puppetmasters. Several conservatives have said the Senator "outed" Mary Cheney with this comment. Commentator Mort Kondracke said immediately after the debate on Fox News that, "Kerry repeated it tonight, which I think is totally underhanded, and that is the outing of Dick Cheney's lesbian daughter." Similarly, radio host Rush Limbaugh said on October 18 that Kerry, "invokes somebody he doesn't know. He outs her." And as the liberal group Media Matters has shown, the Wall Street Journal's editorial page and Newsmax.com have also claimed Cheney was outed. Contrary to these commentators' suggestions, however, Mary Cheney has been publicly "out" for a long period of time. As numerous news outlets have noted, the Vice President has previously acknowledged her homosexuality in public statements. A website started last February by gay activists to urge Mary Cheney to oppose the Bush administration's policies on gay rights was covered by the Los Angeles Times, Newsweek and other publications. And Cheney previously worked as a liaison to the gay and lesbian community for Coors, a highly public position. Mary Cheney was clearly not "outed" because her sexual orientation was not private. Answering rhetoric with reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted March 5, 2007 Share Posted March 5, 2007 Can't win em all spain ....as much as you are trying to put clinton , gore , edwards and even genghis khan in same catergory as coulter , the pieces don't add up ...she is in a totally different class Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts