Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Yahoo! sues for fantasy football information


Outshined
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yahoo! sues for fantasy football information

Last update: June 3, 2009 - 11:59 AM

 

 

 

Internet giant Yahoo! has filed suit in Minnesota, demanding free access to the player information that drives its popular fantasy football game.

 

Yahoo! alleges that the NFL Players Association and corporation has no right to charge for the use of players pictures, biographies and on-field statistics, according to its suit filed this week in federal court. In the past, the NFL Players Association has asserted that those things fall under intellectual property rights.

 

Yahoo!'s fantasy football site relies upon such real-time statistics. Participants use them to decide which players to draft and trade throughout the football season.

 

The issue of whether companies can use league information for fantasy sports sites has come up before. Then, the sport was baseball.

 

In 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit decided that CBC Distribution and Marketing, Inc., could use Major League Baseball players' names and statistics for its fantasy baseball products -- without paying a licensing fee.

 

JENNA ROSS

 

Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yahoo is great at providing statistical information that has all sorts of filters available. I imagine with precedence on thier side that they'll end up on the good side of this one.

 

It bothers me that the NFLPA has blocked access to player salary/bonus information. It's a whole lot more painstaking to get player contract/cap numbers for all players other than Packers now. That sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It bothers me that the NFLPA has blocked access to player salary/bonus information. It's a whole lot more painstaking to get player contract/cap numbers for all players other than Packers now. That sucks.

Rotoworld has the contract info. PIck a player and it has a line that says contract, click on details and the info is usually there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some background for you guys.

 

CBS Interactive recently won a similar decision against the NFLPA - preventing the NFLPA from pressuring or suing them for failure to have a license for the use of player stats in their fantasy games.

 

Yahoo's NFLPA fantasy license expired in March and Yahoo was being pressured with threat of a lawsuit to renew the license. Yahoo's position was of course - given the growing legal precedence - that they don't need a license for fantasy now. They asked for assurances that the NFLPA would not pursue legal actions against them and the NFLPA refused. So Yahoo filed suit for protection (a declaratory judgment) from the NFLPA for their fantasy operations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. The Yahoo! case has been filed in the U.S. District Court of Minnesota. CBS Interactive filed their case there also because stats show Minnesota has a very high concentration of FF players and their District Court falls within the U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. That is the same federal court that the original CBC case had it's win over MLBAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. The Yahoo! case has been filed in the U.S. District Court of Minnesota. CBS Interactive filed their case there also because stats show Minnesota has a very high concentration of FF players and their District Court falls within the U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. That is the same federal court that the original CBC case had it's win over MLBAM.

 

Which only proves that no matter how ####ed up a state is it can still have redeeming value beyond lutefisk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which only proves that no matter how ####ed up a state is it can still have redeeming value beyond lutefisk.

Hey, we'll have two senators soon. Granted, one of them is Al Franken but still.......

 

Lutefisk. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which only proves that no matter how ####ed up a state is it can still have redeeming value beyond lutefisk.

 

Well at least we don't put Grandma in the freezer so we can keep getting her government checks. We don't eat people or use human skin for clothing either. What state do they do those things in again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well at least we don't put Grandma in the freezer so we can keep getting her government checks. We don't eat people or use human skin for clothing either. What state do they do those things in again?

 

I've been to MIN and I've seen you folks eat things that would make cannibalism look tame by comparison. Then you add a bunch of drunken 300+lb men dressing up in Goldilocks wigs and you've got a good start on what looks like a bad acid trip there, my friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been to MIN and I've seen you folks eat things that would make cannibalism look tame by comparison. Then you add a bunch of drunken 300+lb men dressing up in Goldilocks wigs and you've got a good start on what looks like a bad acid trip there, my friend.

 

:D

 

:wacko:

 

A man after my own heart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:D

I've been to MIN and I've seen you folks eat things that would make cannibalism look tame by comparison. Then you add a bunch of drunken 300+lb men dressing up in Goldilocks wigs and you've got a good start on what looks like a bad acid trip there, my friend.

 

You get what you ask for sometimes. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which only proves that no matter how ####ed up a state is it can still have redeeming value beyond lutefisk.

 

 

I've been to MIN and I've seen you folks eat things that would make cannibalism look tame by comparison. Then you add a bunch of drunken 300+lb men dressing up in Goldilocks wigs and you've got a good start on what looks like a bad acid trip there, my friend.

 

These had me laughing till I couldn't breathe. It's rare I LOL, even rarer that I laugh that hard. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information