electricrelish Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 (edited) Is anyone else somewhat annoyed to hear countless people say that it's the end of a decade? A decade is a period of ten years, so one could say it starts whenever you decide to start counting. As far as the calendar goes, a new decade begins with the number one, just like the new month and new year begin on January 1st. This current decade began in the year 2001 and will finish at the end of 2010. The new decade will begin on 2011. I remember this being a point of contention nine years ago when everyone thought that the year 2000 was the beginning of the new millennium when it really started in 2001. If you look a decade up on wikipedia, which is not a reliable source for fact, the writer redefines what a decade is by giving it a cultural definition, claiming that a cultural decade starts with the number zero and ends with the number nine. Apparently, an ordinal decade, which starts at one and ends with ten, is uncommon and something that only mathematicians use. When networks like ESPN are having end of the decade specials and countless people keep getting it wrong, it appears that wikipedia is now correct. There are so many people that have incorrectly labeled a decade beginning with the number zero that it appears to no longer matter. It ain't right, but if you understand what the word "ain't" is, then does it really matter? Edited January 5, 2010 by electricrelish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboysDiehard Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 It begins when I say it does. Now get back to work! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I always have trouble with this, but found understnading this way: 2010 years ago, theoretically, there was Janaury 1, 0000. Most envision that date as the start of our "modern" recordkeeping...or AD. 10 full years later, there was January 1, 0010 10 full years later, there was January 1, 0020 ...and so on. Also, for ease of referring to eras of time as either the 20's, 30's or 40's, its much easier to define 10 years not from the one's place (as you suggest), but the 10's place in the numeral. mathemeticians are geeks anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Cid Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I always have trouble with this, but found understnading this way: 2010 years ago, theoretically, there was Janaury 1, 0000. Most envision that date as the start of our "modern" recordkeeping...or AD. 10 full years later, there was January 1, 0010 10 full years later, there was January 1, 0020 ...and so on. Also, for ease of referring to eras of time as either the 20's, 30's or 40's, its much easier to define 10 years not from the one's place (as you suggest), but the 10's place in the numeral. mathemeticians are geeks anyway My understanding is that there was no year 0000. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 year 1 was actually the second year. year 0 is the 1st year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I also heard there was no year zero. 1 AD was the first year after 1 BC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westvirginia Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I also heard there was no year zero. 1 AD was the first year after 1 BC. Right, which is why the new decade starts on 2011. But also like relish says, it's one of those pet peeves that doesn't really matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 My understanding is that there was no year 0000. I guess there is so much confusion, because a variety of thoughts on this subject are used: Year Zero Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I don't think it's black and white when you refer to a decade. Now, we have had 3 milleniums in AD, the first, second and third which began on Jan 1, 2001. Same with centuries, since the 1st century is from Jan 1 1 AD to Dec 31 100 AD. When you talk of the decade of the 80's or 90's I'd say it's reasonable to sau you're speaking of 1980-89, NOT 1981 - 1990, etc. So ESPN is right in their pop culture format. People crewed up the century thing big time, but those are given actual #'s as in the 14th century. We're not counting the 1,980th decade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I kinda find the whole topic a little annoying frankly but yes, this IS a new decade. I don't give a flip about year One. 1970 isn't part of the 60s, 1979 not part of the 80s etc etc. So it's a new decade. The first decade A.D. was just a unique exception. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 After 12-21-2012 it won't matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 (edited) The Dawn of time. Year 1. December 31st. That is the completion of one year. Year 9. December 31st 11:59:59:.... That is the completion of one decade. Year 10 January 1st 12:00:00am . That is the first second into the next decade. Edited January 5, 2010 by Duchess Jack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westvirginia Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 The Dawn of time.Year 1. December 31st. That is the completion of one year. Year 9. December 31st 11:59:59:.... That is the completion of one decade. Year 10 January 1st 12:00:00am . That is the first second into the next decade. My 2-month old could prove this wrong as written, just by using his fingers.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I don't think it's black and white when you refer to a decade. Now, we have had 3 milleniums in AD, the first, second and third which began on Jan 1, 2001. Same with centuries, since the 1st century is from Jan 1 1 AD to Dec 31 100 AD. When you talk of the decade of the 80's or 90's I'd say it's reasonable to sau you're speaking of 1980-89, NOT 1981 - 1990, etc. So ESPN is right in their pop culture format. People crewed up the century thing big time, but those are given actual #'s as in the 14th century. We're not counting the 1,980th decade. Agree. Decades, centuries and milleniums are of any 10, 100, or 100 year periods respectively and don't have a prescribed start date unless you are talking sequential order from year one. So 1910 was a century ago. But for order of centuries, this is the 21st century that began in 2001. So for decades, this would be the last year of the 201st decade, but since that is rarely denoted, you can say 2010 is in the decade of the 2010s, or more commony stated, the 10s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 My 2-month old could prove this wrong as written, just by using his fingers.... eh....ooops. I was trying to make a point, but tripped over my wake and bake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Holy Roller Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 I kinda find the whole topic a little annoying frankly but yes, this IS a new decade. I don't give a flip about year One. 1970 isn't part of the 60s, 1979 not part of the 80s etc etc. So it's a new decade. The first decade A.D. was just a unique exception. Trying...hard...not...to...agree...with...BeeR. But I do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustOfBeenDrunk Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Ok so is 12:00 PM in the middle of the day or in the middle of the night ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 its 2010 and i am turning 40 this year That is basically all that matters to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 Ok so is 12:00 PM in the middle of the day or in the middle of the night ? PM is not technacally correct to use at 12:00, but 12:00 PM is noon - middle of the day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustOfBeenDrunk Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 PM is not technacally correct to use at 12:00, but 12:00 PM is noon - middle of the day. I read a big article on this sometime back that was based on someone trying to fight a parking ticket. They finally settled it by using the US postal service as source. 12:00 PM was acceptable as noon but 12:00 AM is not ever acceptably ?? If I remember the article correctly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustOfBeenDrunk Posted January 5, 2010 Share Posted January 5, 2010 This show both 12am & 12pm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12-hour_clock Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.