godtomsatan Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 Anyone else have a problem with this? I get it when there are necessary reasons to have someone completely disrobe for a physical inspection, but doesn't this kind of go completely against the definition of "unreasonable search" in the 4th amendment? Our court seems to be increasingly, uh, conservative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted April 2, 2012 Share Posted April 2, 2012 Anyone else have a problem with this? I get it when there are necessary reasons to have someone completely disrobe for a physical inspection, but doesn't this kind of go completely against the definition of "unreasonable search" in the 4th amendment? Our court seems to be increasingly, uh, conservative. Hmm. But can you strip search a corporation, because this court says they are people? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt770 Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 That Jennifer Lawrence looks pretty suspicious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 That Joey Lawrence looks pretty suspicious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Whoa 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted April 3, 2012 Author Share Posted April 3, 2012 Whoa A mere laughy face thingy doesn't do the giggling on this end justice.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millerx Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I have no problem with this. If I am arrested and asked if I am concealing something, I should reveal it. If they feel I am not forthright, they have a right verify it. Are they suppose to just take my word for it? What if I have a .22 shoved up my arse? Then again, I'm not a criminal, so I don't have any real concerns either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 What if I have a .22 shoved up my arse? Then again, I'm not a criminal, so I don't have any real concerns either. Your concern ought to be that you have an unnaturally enormous arse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted April 3, 2012 Author Share Posted April 3, 2012 Then again, I'm not a criminal, so I don't have any real concerns either. Neither was the guy who filed the suit. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 (edited) I have no problem with this. If I am arrested and asked if I am concealing something, I should reveal it. I'm the first one to make fun of all the Paultards complaining about breeches of Liberty, but there is beef to this story since it involved a Supreme Court Decision. Freedom nor liberty nor safety is served by giving cops more freedom to give a full body cavity search on their discretion? Edited April 3, 2012 by bushwacked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Your concern ought to be that you have an unnaturally enormous arse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joessfl Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Neither was the guy who filed the suit. I will take your word for it about the guy who filed the suit. But Joey Lawrence is a criminal. He stole my heart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 I have no problem with this. If I am arrested and asked if I am concealing something, I should reveal it. If they feel I am not forthright, they have a right verify it. Are they suppose to just take my word for it? What if I have a .22 shoved up my arse? Then again, I'm not a criminal, so I don't have any real concerns either. The Supreme Court’s decision continued a trend that began after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks of giving jailers more leeway in searching those picked up even for the most minor offenses, such as expired licenses or noisy mufflers. Just sayin' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentastic Posted April 3, 2012 Share Posted April 3, 2012 Anyone not outraged by this ruling is a fracking idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfan Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 Big Brother loves You. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted April 4, 2012 Share Posted April 4, 2012 What if I have a .22 shoved up my arse? I heard you like a bigger caliber. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.