Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Darren Waller thinks he's TE1


darin3
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, darin3 said:

Darren Waller ranked his top-5 TEs in the NFL

 

Of course he ranked himself #1 - which he's not, but gotta love the confidence.

 

That said, it's a good list.  I think I may have Andrews over Kittle in terms of a pass-catcher, but Kittle excels at run-blocking, which is critical to the success of the SFO offense.

 

Thoughts?

Well hes a lot closer than Chase Claypool is to a top 3 receiver!  Although Chase's ceiling could be pretty high if he puts it together. I do like Waller but not sure exactly where to rank him in drafts. Since I am not sure and the price is high I usually just avoid it. The addition of Adams raises a few question marks too. 

I don't think I have an opinion on Andrews and Kittle, they seem right at the same tier to me. Pitts only has a season so can't really rank, he could be above or below those guys. Kelce is 33 this year and getting a fair amount of mileage so I guess we'll see how long he can keep it up. Hes played a lot of tough football the last 4 years.

Regardless I'd put all 4 clearly above Waller. 

Edited by purplemonster
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Waller is 1, especially with the addition of Adams but he's top 5.

Kelce and Andrews are clearly 1 and 2 and an argument could be made for each as top dog. Pitts is 3 for me and then it's Waller. After those 4, it's Shultz, Kittle and Hock. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, irish said:

I don't think Waller is 1, especially with the addition of Adams but he's top 5.

Kelce and Andrews are clearly 1 and 2 and an argument could be made for each as top dog. Pitts is 3 for me and then it's Waller. After those 4, it's Shultz, Kittle and Hock. 

 

If I was drafting today it would be Mandrews, Kelce and Pitts. One can argue that Waller is right there at 4 or 5 but I don't see the value. I'd rather wait and grab Freirmuth later on to maximize that value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/3/2022 at 3:39 AM, irish said:

I don't think Waller is 1, especially with the addition of Adams but he's top 5.

Kelce and Andrews are clearly 1 and 2 and an argument could be made for each as top dog. Pitts is 3 for me and then it's Waller. After those 4, it's Shultz, Kittle and Hock. 

 

That's about where I'm at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information