gogo2146 Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 (edited) See if you guys can give me a hand here. I pick number #6 next year. I have these players to chose from in a keeper leauge see what you think on who I should keep ( can keep 5) and who I should target in the draft? I also have Sproles on a taxi squad. Dillon (339) Brees (363 pts) Barlow( please) Walker(349) H. Ward(239) M. Clayton (283) A. Boldin( ??) J. Witten (247 pts) Balt D (374) I will be able to draft A good back or wr out of the draft C. benson and C. Williams are on Taxi squads already. I would like brown to fall to me at the 6th spot. Thanks for the help. Edited February 19, 2005 by gogo2146 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Dick Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 See if you guys can give me a hand here.I pick number #6 next year. I have these players to chose from in a keeper leauge see what you think on who I should keep ( can keep 5) and who I should target in the draft? I also have Sproles on a taxi squad. Dillon (339) Brees (363 pts) Barlow( please) Walker(349) H. Ward(239) M. Clayton (283) A. Boldin( ??) J. Witten (247 pts) Balt D (374) I will be able to draft A good back or wr out of the draft C. benson and C. Williams are on Taxi squads already. I would like brown to fall to me at the 6th spot. Thanks for the help. 704739[/snapback] I'd keep Dillon, Walker, Clayton, Witten, and maybe Boldin. You may be able to parlay a couple of these receivers for a running back. If this is a mandatory TE league, I'd probably keep Witten over Boldin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted February 19, 2005 Share Posted February 19, 2005 Really that's terrible. But I would keep Dillon Witten or Brees and Hines will explode next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogo2146 Posted February 20, 2005 Author Share Posted February 20, 2005 Yes, TE's must start. I,m thinking Dillon, Walker,Ward,Clayton Trade boldin and Witten for a rb also, Balt D should have some thought as a keeper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogo2146 Posted February 20, 2005 Author Share Posted February 20, 2005 Yes, TE's must start. I can keep five total. I,m thinking Brees, Dillon, Walker,Ward,Clayton Trade boldin and Witten for a rb also, Balt D should have some thought as a keeper don't know? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Dick Posted February 20, 2005 Share Posted February 20, 2005 Yes, TE's must start.I,m thinking Dillon, Walker,Ward,Clayton Trade boldin and Witten for a rb also, Balt D should have some thought as a keeper 705143[/snapback] Since TE is mandatory, I keep: Dillon, Walker, Clayton, Witten. Trade Ward and Boldin for the best RB you can get. Then keep that RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogo2146 Posted February 20, 2005 Author Share Posted February 20, 2005 I might have a trade Boldin, Ward for J. Jones or K. Jones i will get one of the Jones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted February 20, 2005 Share Posted February 20, 2005 I think you need to wait on what happens with Farve to make a decision on Walker. I also like Clayton over Horn, if there is no limit on how many years you can keep keepers. Also, depending on the TE scoring in your league, packaging Witten for an RB sounds like a solid move, but you may be able to get a solid RB at 6 instead, given all the RB's in this draft, and a guy like Jordan possibly being available. Right now, it's too early to make these decisions, IMHO. There are too many things up in the air, until rosters are set. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogo2146 Posted February 22, 2005 Author Share Posted February 22, 2005 I think you need to wait on what happens with Farve to make a decision on Walker. I also like Clayton over Horn, if there is no limit on how many years you can keep keepers. Also, depending on the TE scoring in your league, packaging Witten for an RB sounds like a solid move, but you may be able to get a solid RB at 6 instead, given all the RB's in this draft, and a guy like Jordan possibly being available. Right now, it's too early to make these decisions, IMHO. There are too many things up in the air, until rosters are set. 705547[/snapback] I like Clayton too but i do not have Horn. There is no limit how long you can keep players. I think Witten, Ward or Ward, boldin for a rb might be the best choice I have. i will have to drop one of those players before the draft so why not dump them know for a player that will be on the rise come summer. If i trade know I will get better vaule for a unproven player ( one of the Jones on the rise) for one stud(Ward and a player i might have to drop. Make sense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatman Posted February 22, 2005 Share Posted February 22, 2005 Balt D should have some thought as a keeper 705143[/snapback] No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
godtomsatan Posted February 22, 2005 Share Posted February 22, 2005 Yes, TE's must start. I can keep five total.I,m thinking Brees, Dillon, Walker,Ward,Clayton Trade boldin and Witten for a rb also, Balt D should have some thought as a keeper 705149[/snapback] That's the logical 5, though are you going to get a keeper RB for those two players? I doubt it.... And never keep a defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogo2146 Posted February 23, 2005 Author Share Posted February 23, 2005 That's the logical 5, though are you going to get a keeper RB for those two players? I doubt it.... And never keep a defense. 707404[/snapback] I think the same about a D but you have to think about it balt D outscored most of those starters and you win games in points. I have never kept a D in 7 years but maybe just maybe??? Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Men In Tights Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 (edited) I think the same about a D but you have to think about it balt D outscored most of those starters and you win games in points. I have never kept a D in 7 years but maybe just maybe??? Thanks 708163[/snapback] How in the world does a D outscore all of those players??? Edit to add keepers, Ward, Witten, walker, Dillon, and Clayton. If you can trade Ward and Boldin for J Jones I would do that one, but K Jones is also tempting. I would also try to get a draft pick or at least a young WR with some potential. Edited February 23, 2005 by Men In Tights Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outfit Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 I would keep Dillon,Walker,Clayton,Ward and Witten. I would try to package Barlow/Boldin for a Rb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogo2146 Posted February 24, 2005 Author Share Posted February 24, 2005 I know its shocking a D can score that much check it out shflsports.com look under the scoring rules it is unreal. Barlow doesn't hold much vaule right know I wish i could trade him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piranha Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Barlow could be trouble this year. He is also not happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Dick Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 I think the same about a D but you have to think about it balt D outscored most of those starters and you win games in points. I have never kept a D in 7 years but maybe just maybe??? Thanks 708163[/snapback] You don't keep a D because they are so unpredictable in scoring. And you can usually draft a defense that will score similar to the top rated defense later in the draft. As an example, in 2004 in a basic performance league, the 10th ranked defense only scored 65 less points over the course of a season. That translates to a little less than 4 points per week. I would rather take my chances with position players that could make up a difference of 4 points in a dramatic fashion than try to nickel and dime my way with a defense. Just my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piranha Posted February 25, 2005 Share Posted February 25, 2005 I would keep Dillon (339) Brees (363 pts) Walker(349) H. Ward(239) Balt D (374) It's tough to say who to target cause you don't know who is available if no one has named their keepers yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutrun Jellies Posted February 26, 2005 Share Posted February 26, 2005 I would keep: Dillon (339) Walker(349) M. Clayton (283) Balt D (374) And package any of the rest: Brees (363 pts) Barlow( please) H. Ward(239) A. Boldin( ??) J. Witten (247 pts) In the deal to get JULIUS (not Kevin) Jones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogo2146 Posted February 27, 2005 Author Share Posted February 27, 2005 Thanks for the help. I'm still working on the deal for J. Jones My team would look like this if it happens, Dillon Jones Clayton Walker Brees or Balt D maybe Witten ?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutrun Jellies Posted February 27, 2005 Share Posted February 27, 2005 Thanks for the help. I'm still working on the deal for J. Jones My team would look like this if it happens, Dillon Jones Clayton Walker Brees or Balt D maybe Witten ?? 713362[/snapback] I'd look at the probability of who's going to be available to you in the draft to make this final decision. Will all the productive TEs (Gates, Gonzo, Heap, Franks) be kept, upping the value of Witten as a keeper? What will be on the line for QBs? I like keeping Balt's defense, but if nobody in your league keeps defenses, maybe you can let them go and get a good defense in the draft. Is it worth letting Clayton or Walker back into the draft to secure Witten since, if I remember right, yours is a TE mandatory league -- and then use the final keeper for either QB or DEF, depending on what's likely to be available? Can you package Brees, Balt, and Clayton for McNabb? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogo2146 Posted February 27, 2005 Author Share Posted February 27, 2005 I'd look at the probability of who's going to be available to you in the draft to make this final decision. Will all the productive TEs (Gates, Gonzo, Heap, Franks) be kept, upping the value of Witten as a keeper? What will be on the line for QBs? I like keeping Balt's defense, but if nobody in your league keeps defenses, maybe you can let them go and get a good defense in the draft. Is it worth letting Clayton or Walker back into the draft to secure Witten since, if I remember right, yours is a TE mandatory league -- and then use the final keeper for either QB or DEF, depending on what's likely to be available? Can you package Brees, Balt, and Clayton for McNabb? 713467[/snapback] All the Te's you said will be kept (Gates , Gonzo, Heap Franks I doubt it) Most of the guys in this leauge will kept one of the top 4-5 D as in years past. I don't think anyone will trade 3 for 1 since you can only keep 5 players so they would have to make a choice before next yearof who to keep. i do see your point on the player moves. I would like to have the wr shored up for next year so I can go directely after rb or qb in the draft since thats what my team will need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9ersdude Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Dillon (339) Brees (363 pts) Barlow( please) H. Ward(239) J. Witten (247 pts) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.