Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Deion "Mr. Reliable" Branch


WaterMan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Aug 30

 

Paul Perillo, of Patriots Football Weekly, reports New England Patriots WR Deion Branch finished with the NFL's lowest percentage of dropped passes in 2004. According to STATS, Inc., Branch had no drops in 51 passes thrown in his direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aug 30

 

Paul Perillo, of Patriots Football Weekly, reports New England Patriots WR Deion Branch finished with the NFL's lowest percentage of dropped passes in 2004. According to STATS, Inc., Branch had no drops in 51 passes thrown in his direction.

 

958844[/snapback]

 

 

 

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aug 30

 

Paul Perillo, of Patriots Football Weekly, reports New England Patriots WR Deion Branch finished with the NFL's lowest percentage of dropped passes in 2004. According to STATS, Inc., Branch had no drops in 51 passes thrown in his direction.

 

958844[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

:D:D:D:D:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aug 30

 

Paul Perillo, of Patriots Football Weekly, reports New England Patriots WR Deion Branch finished with the NFL's lowest percentage of dropped passes in 2004. According to STATS, Inc., Branch had no drops in 51 passes thrown in his direction.

 

958844[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

Thats nice, but mr. reliable misses games oftenif I recall correctly. He better catch the ball in the games he plays. He also has a very nice ball thrown his way. Who misses those beatiful TB passes? Thats liek missing a montana pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Paul's got his facts screwed up. According to Pro Football Prospectus 2005, Branch caught 35 of 51 passes in '04, or 69%. However, Branch did catch every pass thrown his way in the Superbowl.

Edited by Bonehand
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Paul's got his facts screwed up. According to Pro Football Prospectus 2005, Branch caught 35 of 51 passes in '04, or 69%. However, Branch did catch every pass thrown his way in the Superbowl.

 

959027[/snapback]

 

 

 

no, he said no drops. so a number of passes thrown his way may have been defended, uncatchable, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i've got branch in 3 out of 5 leagues this year.  i guess i just have him higher than most, but he just seems like a dam fine WR to have this year.. :D

 

959157[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

I'm with you Az, I've liked this guy alot ever since he entered the league and feel like he's poised for a breakout season. Hopefully I'm not sitting here saying the same thing next August.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with you Az, I've liked this guy alot ever since he entered the league and feel like he's poised for a breakout season.  Hopefully I'm not sitting here saying the same thing next August.

 

959189[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

his upside may be limited due to the pats system. although it may change some with a new off. coordinator. still a lot of receivers on that team and brady uses the TE quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Paul's got his facts screwed up. According to Pro Football Prospectus 2005, Branch caught 35 of 51 passes in '04, or 69%. However, Branch did catch every pass thrown his way in the Superbowl.

 

959027[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

Ah, but there's a subtle difference there. Just because he didn't catch every ball thrown to him doesn't mean he dropped any. Some missed catches are attributable to poorly thrown balls, or a defender breaking up the pass, for instance.

 

The 0 dropped passes was, however, reported by stats, inc. here: http://snap.stats.com/stats/nflinfo/player...=5951&Submit=Go

 

Scroll to the bottom.

Edited by yo mama
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think Givens is the guy to have this year.  His size makes him a great red zone target.  He started off last year with at least his first 25 receptions being for 1st down.

959495[/snapback]

 

That's what I thought last year as well, and I was right, until Branch came back and then Givens went from being a reliable starter to disappointingly average...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i've got branch in 3 out of 5 leagues this year.  i guess i just have him higher than most, but he just seems like a dam fine WR to have this year.. :D

 

959157[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

I'm with you Az, I've liked this guy alot ever since he entered the league and feel like he's poised for a breakout season.  Hopefully I'm not sitting here saying the same thing next August.

 

959189[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

his upside may be limited due to the pats system. although it may change some with a new off. coordinator.  still a lot of receivers on that team and brady uses the TE quite a bit.

 

959440[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

I still think Givens is the guy to have this year.  His size makes him a great red zone target.  He started off last year with at least his first 25 receptions being for 1st down.

 

959495[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

That's what I thought last year as well, and I was right, until Branch came back and then Givens went from being a reliable starter to disappointingly average...

 

959517[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

I was on the Givens bandwagon last season when Branch was out. Givens and Patten looked like a nice duo for Brady. But then Branch comes back and it was completely obvious who Brady favors.

 

While Givens may be a nice redzone target (and their glut of TEs), Branch is still the bonafide "number one" for the Pats.

 

I have Branch in a few leagues, and am expecting good things from him... whether or not they "spread the ball around" or will be affected by not having Weis there.

 

Decent #2 WR in most leagues... fantastic #3 in all (where I have him pegged).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information