Vet Posted September 26, 2005 Author Share Posted September 26, 2005 I am now stupider for reading this post 1022446[/snapback] Actually, if you want to use proper English, you are stupider for having read this post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 I have Lamont, and I start him every week, along with D. Davis and J. Jones. So far so good on all three counts. I also have C. Brown on my bench. Jordan has been solid. Not great, but decent, a serviceable #2 RB, or a very good #3 RB. Pretty much what he was labeled as going into the season. If I get 70 yards and a TD from a #2 or #3 RB each week, especially against very tough defenses, I'll take it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phootballphreak Posted September 26, 2005 Share Posted September 26, 2005 Will this thread ever end? Jordan is producing exactly as I thought he would. A servicable 2nd back and a great 3rd back. He's putting points on the board that are rather consistant and I think they will continue that way thru the season. He's touching the ball alot which is a good indication that the coaching staff is comfortable with him. He should end the year any where between the 12th and 17th best RB. I will take that from my 2nd or even 3rd Rb. Ill take consistancy over an erratic player any day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 No update from Vet this week? Shocking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted October 3, 2005 Author Share Posted October 3, 2005 No update from Vet this week? Shocking. 1039038[/snapback] Dude, I just got home. What - did he have a good game or something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 90 rushing yds + a td and whatever he did receiving. I'm sure it's not up to your standards though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted October 3, 2005 Author Share Posted October 3, 2005 90 rushing yds + a td and whatever he did receiving. I'm sure it's not up to your standards though. 1039052[/snapback] Even a blind pig finds a root now and then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberho27 Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 90 rushing yds + a td and whatever he did receiving. I'm sure it's not up to your standards though. 1039052[/snapback] actually it was 126 yds rushing + td and 22yds receiving Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 I do, however, have Cadillac and Julius Jones!!! 1020825[/snapback] Jordan scored more than both of them combined this week. I know, Cadillac hurt his hammy so he didn't play the whole game (did he even play one half?). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted October 3, 2005 Author Share Posted October 3, 2005 ...this week... 1039072[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 1039086[/snapback] I'll give you that Vet. I'll certainly be watching to see what ends up happening with Cadillac's injury since I do have him in my lineup. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 (edited) I'll give you that Vet. I'll certainly be watching to see what ends up happening with Cadillac's injury since I do have him in my lineup. 1039128[/snapback] Well, don't forget, Vet told us how great Caddy was going to be here. EDIT: fixed. Edited October 3, 2005 by Chavez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 (edited) Well, don't forget, Vet told us how great Caddy was going to be here. 1039144[/snapback] Oh I remember that. Edit: fixed Edited October 3, 2005 by Gunther Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted October 3, 2005 Author Share Posted October 3, 2005 Well, don't forget, Vet told us how great Caddy was going to be here. EDIT: fixed. 1039144[/snapback] Remind me again - what are Carnell Williams and LaMont Jordan's year to date numbers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Remind me again - what are Carnell Williams and LaMont Jordan's year to date numbers? 1039169[/snapback] What are Jordan and Martins YTD stats? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Point is you were flappin' yer gums about how YOU said Caddy was going to be a stud. And oddly enough, all I could find was you ASKING who the best rookie RB was going to be. Maybe you told yer pals at the local watering hole the Carnell was going to lead the NFL in rushing after 3 weeks, but you have nothing here to back up your sh-t-talk, so the wise move would be to shut your pole hole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted October 3, 2005 Author Share Posted October 3, 2005 (edited) Point is you were flappin' yer gums about how YOU said Caddy was going to be a stud. And oddly enough, all I could find was you ASKING who the best rookie RB was going to be. Maybe you told yer pals at the local watering hole the Carnell was going to lead the NFL in rushing after 3 weeks, but you have nothing here to back up your sh-t-talk, so the wise move would be to shut your pole hole. 1039173[/snapback] Listen you son of a crack w h o r e - bottom line is I was smart enough to take Carnell Williams and pass on LaMont Jordan. Now go back to sucking your aunt's stinky snatch. Edited October 3, 2005 by Vet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombs Away Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Wow, did you see Martin today, he'll be MVP this year. Jordan was expendable wasn't he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Remind me again - what are Carnell Williams and LaMont Jordan's year to date numbers? 1039169[/snapback] Jordan 421 total yards 3 TD's and 16 catches = 76 pts in my league Williams 453 total yards 2 TD's and 3 catches = 60 pts in my league Of course I am not saying Joordan is better. just giving you those stats you asked for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombs Away Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Hey if the Jets get lucky, they could get the #1 draft choice next year and get themselves a QB or a RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 (edited) Listen you son of a crack w h o r e - bottom line is I was smart enough to take Carnell Williams and pass on LaMont Jordan. 1039183[/snapback] So was I; so what's with the axe grinding? EDIT: Actually, I was mistaken. I have both in the league I was thinking of. Edited October 3, 2005 by Chavez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Vatican Hitsquad Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Vet seems to be crumbling under the pressure of his own words and being a Jet fan for so long. Cadillac got hurt, that was a huge surprise. TB was driving that car 100MPH, was only a matter of time before the NFL hype machine would have to find somebody else to advertise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Vet seems to be crumbling under the pressure of his own words and being a Jet fan for so long. Cadillac got hurt, that was a huge surprise. TB was driving that car 100MPH, was only a matter of time before the NFL hype machine would have to find somebody else to advertise. 1039264[/snapback] Being a Jets fan does tend to make one quite bitter. Myself, I now look like a lemon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiss Cheezhead Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Point is you were flappin' yer gums about how YOU said Caddy was going to be a stud. And oddly enough, all I could find was you ASKING who the best rookie RB was going to be. Maybe you told yer pals at the local watering hole the Carnell was going to lead the NFL in rushing after 3 weeks, but you have nothing here to back up your sh-t-talk, so the wise move would be to shut your pole hole. 1039173[/snapback] Bingo. I'm still waiting for a "Vet's Predictions" thread, so we can have a record of his Nostradamus-like football acumen. By the way, I have Keenan McCardell and Plaxico Burress in a couple of leagues. It was just so obvious that they'd have 664 yards and 9 TDs between them by now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pounders Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 I'm not interested in any league where a RB with 72 yards from scrimmage gets essentially the same points as a RB with 137 yards from scrimmage. You need to rethink your scoring system. 1021796[/snapback] Why would any one be slamming a #2/#3 running back who was scored 13, 12 14, & 23 in the first four games. I will take points like that from my #2/#3 rb, he is averaging over 15 points a game at that rate, The scoring system in my main league that would make him pushing for a weak #1 back or a strong #2 at this stage of the season. and as far as this quote goes "I'm not interested in any league where a RB with 72 yards from scrimmage gets essentially the same points as a RB with 137 yards from scrimmage. You need to rethink your scoring system. ' the rb with 137 yards DID NOT FIND ENDZONE! its as much or more about touchdowns than it is yards from scrimmage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.