Chavez Posted June 25, 2007 Share Posted June 25, 2007 In a 6-man keeper, I have C Johnson, Holt, Colston, and Driver as my WRs. Which two have not only the best prospects THIS year, but long term? I'm tempted to just hang onto CJ and Holt, but Driver is a f*cking rock and Colston has awesome upside. I also have an offer for a 1st rounder for CJ, less for any of the other guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted June 25, 2007 Share Posted June 25, 2007 What offers do you have on the others? If there will be some good talent in the draft pool, I may be tempted to go ahead and deal CJ and keep Holt and Colston, and then deal Driver for another pick. What ever route you go, deal the two you don't keep for picks. Better than releasing them for nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted June 26, 2007 Share Posted June 26, 2007 What ever route you go, deal the two you don't keep for picks. Better than releasing them for nothing. Agreed. If you have to keep 2 of those guys, I would be keeping CJ & Holt. Proven track record & still have some years left with both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted June 26, 2007 Author Share Posted June 26, 2007 The guy has a woodrow for CJ - I figure CJ and Holt are essentially coin-flips; I'd be willing to live with Holt as my #1 guy. And as much as I love Driver, due to the fact Favre may be gone soon and that Driver is the oldest of the crew anyway, he's trade bait as well. I'm figuring I might try dangling CJ and Driver for his 1st and 3rd rounders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 The guy has a woodrow for CJ - I figure CJ and Holt are essentially coin-flips; I'd be willing to live with Holt as my #1 guy. And as much as I love Driver, due to the fact Favre may be gone soon and that Driver is the oldest of the crew anyway, he's trade bait as well. I'm figuring I might try dangling CJ and Driver for his 1st and 3rd rounders. Depending on how high his pick is, I would do that. But I would be fine with keeping CJ & Holt as well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roo Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 I agree that long term Driver is not the way to go. CJ feels more long term than Holt in my book, but that's a tough one. I'd deal Holt and Driver, roll with CJ and Colston. If you can't get good enough value, do the obvious and keep Holt, CJ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 i am a big colston fan and think he will only get better especially with Horn out of town now ...tough call but i would go CJ and Colston ..good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted June 27, 2007 Share Posted June 27, 2007 try to trade any 1 or 2 of those guys to get a RB and then keep the WR leftover... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted July 3, 2007 Author Share Posted July 3, 2007 Hot diggity - a 1st and a 5th for Holt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Hot diggity - a 1st and a 5th for Holt. I would've said trade CJ and keep Holt and Colston. Now keep CJ and Colston. Take the age of Colston. He could easily exceed Driver this year and definetely exceed them next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 just saw this.... would have said cj and colston before the trade... the trade solidifies that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 Hot diggity - a 1st and a 5th for Holt. You have done well, my young apprentice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Wolf Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 just saw this.... would have said cj and colston before the trade... the trade solidifies that +1...CJ is set for years with Palmer at QB and Colston is young with a ton of upside. Awesome job in that trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Men In Tights Posted July 3, 2007 Share Posted July 3, 2007 +1...CJ is set for years with Palmer at QB and Colston is young with a ton of upside. Awesome job in that trade. Otherwise I would have said to deal CJ and then draft TJ and get very close to the same production. Either way great trade for Holt. Only a Packer fan could pull off a deal like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.