Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

More bad economic news


The Irish Doggy
 Share

Recommended Posts

The poor people in America get a free government sponsored cell phone that only dials 6 numbers. Boo f'n hoo.

 

The poor people in the rest of the world starve and die in 4 days.

 

Yeah, just being born in the USA...even the dirtiest poorest nastiest places like growing up a Vikings fan, you've still won the civilization lottery more than any of us can probably ever imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 274
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The job gains were concentrated in relatively few sectors: retailers added 27,900 positions, likely in preparation for the holiday season. Temporary agencies added 34,900. Restaurants and bars hired 24,400 people.

 

Not exactly what an out of work professional head of household is looking for, but ...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the double-dip fears seem to be all but erased. the election and the fed actions certainly seem to be buoying the spirits of investors. a modest job gain (when gallup and others were predicting another loss)....yeah, there may be some rays of sunshine here.

 

Ummm, these latest results simply reinforce, and give validity to, the dem talking point that the stimulus and dem policies are in fact beginning to work. This stuff doesn't happen overnight, ya know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The inverse silver lining to today's jobs report that will be lost in the shuffle of what is perceived as a good NFP (despite consistent initial jobless claims of around 450K, which means that either there is a massive data error, or the rate of job creation has somehow surged) is that labor force participation has now dropped to the lowest rate it has been since 1984, at 64.5%. Assuming a reversion to the long-term average participation rate of 66%, means that the civilian labor force is in reality 157.4 million as opposed to the disclosed 153.9 million, a delta of 3.5 million currently unaccounted for. Maybe someone can ask the president during his imminent press conference what happened to the unemployed population, which would have been 18.3 if this labor force delta was incorporated, resulting in an unemployment rate of 11.6%.

 

link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not exactly what an out of work professional head of household is looking for, but ...........

 

 

the double-dip fears seem to be all but erased. the election and the fed actions certainly seem to be buoying the spirits of investors. a modest job gain (when gallup and others were predicting another loss)....yeah, there may be some rays of sunshine here.

 

 

Look at the beautiful sunrise.

 

Az/Driveby: Yeah but it's in my eyes.

 

:wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine Obama has had them taken off to extermination camps run by his death panels, since those poor guys weren't allowed to participate in health care.

 

Actually, I don't find it at all surprising that the workforce has shrunk. Immigration is down, many have taken early retirement and the number of HS / U grads is lower than the retiree numbers (probably)

Edited by Ursa Majoris
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

U.S. unemployment stays at 9.6%

Friday, November 05, 2010

By Ann Belser, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported this morning that the national unemployment rate remained unchanged for October, remaining at 9.6 percent for the third straight month.

 

It was the 15th month that the unemployment rate has been at 9.5 percent or higher.The number of non-farm jobs rose by 151,000, the bureau reported, but the number of people who are unemployed remained unchanged at 14.8 million. Long-term joblessness continues to be a persistent problem with 6.2 million people, or 42 percent of the unemployed, out of work for more than 6 months

 

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10309/11009...m#ixzz14SPq0MQD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Gee, I wonder how they did that?

 

THE JOBS REPORT FOR OCTOBER was released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Friday, and at first blush was surprisingly strong, much stronger, indeed, than expected. Payrolls expanded by 151,000 and the two previous months' were revised upward. But hold the hurrahs. The unemployment rate was stuck at 9.6%, and, toss in the underemployed and the rate remains at an elevated 17%.

 

Moreover, the household version of the employment picture was a real bummer, showing an employment drop of 330,000. That especially weird disparity between the household and the payroll reports made us do a double-take. Happily, the always astute Stephanie Pomboy of MacroMavens provided a quickie explanation:

"The seasonal bar which the payroll data must jump was (inexplicably and dramatically) lowered from prior Octobers."

Thus in October 2009, the BLS set the bar at 870,000 jobs, similar to the 840,000 it anticipated in October 2008. This year, by contrast, it lowered the bar to 768,000. Mumbo, jumbo, payrolls presented "an upside surprise" of 100,000.

 

According to John Williams at Shadow Government Statistics, the BLS' fiddling with the figures via what he calls "seasonal-factor games" actually created 200,000 phantom jobs last month. John cites such finagling as the reason his prediction of an October decline and a rise in the jobless rate was wrong. It also explains why seasonally adjusted payrolls were revised upward by 110,000 in September including 56,000 in August.

 

As we've observed before, those seasonal adjustments sure are magical: They can make it snow in the Sahara and be hot as blazes in the middle of winter in Siberia.

 

:wacko:

 

Anymore tripe you would like me to watch you guzzle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you like your slice of yellow cake to go?

 

 

Not a slice, I prefer it by the truckload, just like saddam.

 

The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program — a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium — reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.

 

The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" — the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy.

 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:tup:

 

It was the third-straight profitable quarter for GM, which needed $50 billion in U.S. government aid to make it through bankruptcy protection last year. The company has repaid or plans to repay taxpayers $9.5 billion, and the government hopes to get back the remaining $40 billion with the Nov. 18 common stock offering and several follow-up sales.

 

:wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad to see they are going to be able to pay us back, I still disagree with what was done. I also think the tax breaks they are going to get are total BS.

 

 

A few short years ago, GM's ex-CEO was supposed met rather tangible goals as part of the federal funding agreement. He didn't and resigned as a condition of receiving additional federal bailout $$$ under pressure from the Obama administration. This started a multi-page Have to agree here Zobama Socialism thread that you took a predictable role in. Now it appears it was the right decision and the loan will be repaid.

 

So, GM CEO resigning as a federal funding condition is Socialism, GM paying back the loan is barely worthy of acknowledgment, and tax breaks are completely BS and yer outraged?

 

What a completely unpredictable knee-jerk. Do you really wonder why people don't take you seriously? :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few short years ago, GM's ex-CEO was supposed met rather tangible goals as part of the federal funding agreement. He didn't and resigned as a condition of receiving additional federal bailout $$$ under pressure from the Obama administration. This started a multi-page Have to agree here Zobama Socialism thread that you took a predictable role in. Now it appears it was the right decision and the loan will be repaid.

 

So, GM CEO resigning as a federal funding condition is Socialism, GM paying back the loan is barely worthy of acknowledgment, and tax breaks are completely BS and yer outraged?

 

What a completely unpredictable knee-jerk. Do you really wonder why people don't take you seriously? :wacko:

 

My disagreement is with what they did. They exceeded what I believe to be their constitutional authority both in forcing the CEO (who was a POS) to resign, and in screwing over the bond holders in favor of their unions supporters. That is why I disagreed with the temporary government take over of a business. I am glad it appears as though we are going to get our money back. I think that is great. Though I also think we never should have given it to them to begin with, and I think the bond holders should have been able to sell of GM's assets as was their legal right. I also have a problem with GM now having what amounts to an unfair advantage over other automakers, Ford in particular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information