tonyr0802 Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Nice defensive stand there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Living the Dream Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 no way you give them that kind of field position. Its a 1 posession game, punt the ball there and pin them back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 the decision to try for the FG rather than punt was horrendous with the way the Steeler defense is playing....the is a reason Suisham is a mid-season fill-in....he sucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 no way you give them that kind of field position. Its a 1 posession game, punt the ball there and pin them back. the decision to try for the FG rather than punt was horrendous with the way the Steeler defense is playing....the is a reason Suisham is a mid-season fill-in....he sucks. thought for sure after the sack there would be a punt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 With all the injuries that the Pack have had this year and now with Woodson , Driver and Shields all out it would be fitting to see them actually persevere and pull this game out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Wow, Steelers down to 1 TO which means just one challenge now too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Living the Dream Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Wow, Steelers down to 1 TO which means just one challenge now too not necessarily. If they win the 1st challenge, they will still get another, as long as they still have that TO.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 not necessarily. If they win the 1st challenge, they will still get another, as long as they still have that TO.. true, my bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 (edited) way to get off the field on 3rd down DUMB play by Williams, DUMB! Edited February 7, 2011 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiegie Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 what a dipsh|t Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Moran Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 See the whiny Steeler? Looked like a soccer player begging for a yellow card to be given. Wuss wanker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 (edited) that is a catch and fumble recovered by GB edit: he wasn't going to the ground, don't know what Perria (sp) is talking about Edited February 7, 2011 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiegie Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 I think it was a catch, but they ain't overturning that call Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 With what we have seen this year, that pass is incomplete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Hoyle Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Looked incomplete. But on replay looked to be down as the ball came out. Packers need to sustain a drive here to give the D some rest and possibly score. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyOne Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 My first impression was a catch too. When they said now they're overruling and making it incomplete, I said out loud "Wow, I don't think so", and I'm for the Steelers. The other guys watching on TV seem to think the incomplete call is right, though. Not that they know anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 I think it was a catch, but they ain't overturning that call That would be to GB's advantage, so, no, they aren't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valhalla Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Mcartbutt looks upset ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 catch turn 3rd foot ball comes out as he is being tackled...I too doubt they overturn it but no way in my mind that wasnt a catch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 2 calls from the zebras to the Ste@lers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Packers are self-destructing....dropping passes, dumb penalties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 2 calls from the zebras to the Ste@lers i disagree...the call was right, and confirmed. it would have been a bad call had it been overturned....based on the rules as they exist today. OTOH, I totally agree with you....it should be a catch. I think the new rules/interpretations need to be revisted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 i disagree...the call was right, and confirmed. it would have been a bad call had it been overturned....based on the rules as they exist today. OTOH, I totally agree with you....it should be a catch. I think the new rules/interpretations need to be revisted. we can agree to disagree...agree the rules need to be revisited...but in the case of that catch he wasn't in the air and going to the ground...he caught the ball and turned...my DVR cant be as good as the refs but it is clear he caught the ball with 2 feet down and turned and started to run ...had he been in the air and was coming down and lost it then that is a different scenario surrounding what is a catch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.