Natertater Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 In the league that in LM in the Bell owner traded him to the Gurley owner(!!!!) for jamaal williams and chris hogan... should I veto it?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
League_Champion Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 16 minutes ago, Natertater said: In the league that in LM in the Bell owner traded him to the Gurley owner(!!!!) for jamaal williams and chris hogan... should I veto it?? Yes, veto that instantly. Even though his value is really low right now it's not that low! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrevorThinksHeKnowsFantasy Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 This kind of stuff is so irritating. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaft Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 (edited) That is not your place to veto the trade, let the league vote. Edited September 22, 2018 by Shaft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natertater Posted September 22, 2018 Author Share Posted September 22, 2018 Just now, Shaft said: Are you a commish? LM=league manager=commish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaft Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 Just now, Natertater said: LM=league manager=commish Yeah, I saw that and edited. The "in" threw me off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natertater Posted September 22, 2018 Author Share Posted September 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, Shaft said: That is not your place to veto the trade, let the league vote. My league is lazy and nobody votes on trades, its annoying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaft Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 Just now, Natertater said: My league is lazy and nobody votes on trades, its annoying It's still not your place. And technically, the trade is not that bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starkers Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 When I read to topic I thought it meant the real Bell was traded. Hopes dashed since I also have Conner. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natertater Posted September 22, 2018 Author Share Posted September 22, 2018 Just now, Shaft said: It's still not your place. And technically, the trade is not that bad. Not that bad? If bell comes back then his owner will have the top 2 players in the league Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaft Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 1 minute ago, starkers said: When I read to topic I thought it meant the real Bell was traded. Hopes dashed since I also have Conner. I did the same thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaft Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Natertater said: Not that bad? If bell comes back then his owner will have the top 2 players in the league Based on current value, no, it's not that bad. Unless it obvious collusion, LMs should not influence trades. Edited September 22, 2018 by Shaft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twatt Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 I wouldn’t veto it. And dammit you should have used a better headline. I thought he got traded and was gonna play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbinator Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 10 minutes ago, Natertater said: Not that bad? If bell comes back then his owner will have the top 2 players in the league It shouldn't matter that he has Gurley and now Bell. Either the trade is reasonable or its not. I think it's fine. You can't blame the owner for wanting startable players instead of waiting for Bell in week 10. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ootter Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 Ugh that sucks, but maybe the trade is a good move. It's hard to tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
League_Champion Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 (edited) 56 minutes ago, Shaft said: It's still not your place. And technically, the trade is not that bad. Its a terrible trade and obvious collusion. Look on this forum and see what people have been trading for Bell. Especially Conner owners. Those are 2 bums that are on every waiver wire. Edited September 22, 2018 by League_Champion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purplemonster Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 (edited) I have never been a LM and that sounds like not a great trade but Bell is also sipping Mai tais in Miami. I cant necessarily blame the guy although id shoot for more. Bell very well not be in football shape even if he returns..... Edited September 22, 2018 by purplemonster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaft Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 6 minutes ago, League_Champion said: Its a terrible trade and obvious collusion. Look on this forum and see what people have been trading for Bell. Especially Conner owners. Those are 2 bums that are on every waiver wire. How is this obvious collusion????!!! Everyone's value of Bell differs from owner to owner. Do I think it was a bad trade? Yes, because neither Williams or Hogan has produced, but they were both mid round picks in most drafts. If it's obvious collusion, then veto it. But it being a bad/lopsided trade doesn't make it automatic collusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montana is da Man Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 It's a crappy trade but the bell owner clearly got sick of having him on his bench Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dope man Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 It’s not obvious collusion. This trade isn’t bad for his current value. Only a whinny millennial would vote to veto the trade. I hate vetos, such bs! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millworkguy Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 14 minutes ago, dope man said: It’s not obvious collusion. This trade isn’t bad for his current value. Only a whinny millennial would vote to veto the trade. I hate vetos, such bs! +1, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheets Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 Thats a horrible trade!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
League_Champion Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 You can yank those two scrubs off any waiver wire. Theyll be buried on your bench if not released. I smell a rat, just sayin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
League_Champion Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 50 minutes ago, dope man said: It’s not obvious collusion. This trade isn’t bad for his current value. Only a whinny millennial would vote to veto the trade. I hate vetos, such bs! Millenial? No. And this is coming from a snowflake Yankee New Yorker?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dope man Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 Just now, League_Champion said: Millenial? No. And this is coming from a snowflake Yankee New Yorker?? Then stop f’n crying like a 13 year old girl. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.