Balzac Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Funny, I'm not the one who threw a sh!t fit because of my homosexual brother. It seems to me that you're the one who's upset here. I have no reason to be. BTW, do you ever talk about football here, newbie? 580315[/snapback] I'm not the one who started throwing out f@%$ yous left and right, dude. I called you out - that's it. No sh!t fit was thrown. I post about football all the time. Take a look around the forums. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 I'm not the one who started throwing out f@%$ yous left and right, dude. I called you out - that's it. No sh!t fit was thrown. 580343[/snapback] Wow, it took you 10 minutes to write THAT?! You're even dumber than I suspected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jrick35 Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Mmmmm. And not too swift with the posting sarcasm/jokes yet either I see... 580298[/snapback] I'm trying to learn but there is so much info to take in and so little time. :violin: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Given that many conservative Christian organizations think that people like your brother are going to burn in hell and that our own President is trying to pass a Constitutional Ammendment to limit his rights, you should be happy that I really have nothing against homosexuals. Again, if you don't like what I have to say, don't respond to my posts. It's that easy. 579793[/snapback] I call BS. If that were true you wouldn't toss that word around, thus reinforcing some people's beliefs that it's okay to piss on other people rights, for something that isn't anyone's business but the person(s) in question. If you believed what just said, you could easily come up with a 'better put down' (quotes for lack of a better term). You worse in many ways: 'Oh I'm tolerant, but you're still a homo.' I guess your lame ass purdue doctorate didn't teach you the meaning of hypocrisy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSab Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Fly Eagles Fly on the road to victory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rellen13 Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 MAN Bill, you are just SO angry at life. How do you vent in the offseason?Baseball? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 You worse in many ways: 'Oh I'm tolerant, but you're still a homo.' 580350[/snapback] Yeah, "I worse." You love Bush, yet Bush proposed a Constitutional Ammendment to ban gay marriage. Apparently you haven't learned the meaning of irony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balzac Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Wow, it took you 10 minutes to write THAT?! You're even dumber than I suspected. 580347[/snapback] I'm at work, nimrod. People tend to get distracted by real-life concerns while at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Yeah, "I worse." You love Bush, yet Bush proposed a Constitutional Ammendment to ban gay marriage. Apparently you haven't learned the meaning of irony. 580355[/snapback] You don't make it into the Tailgate very often, do you Bill? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fballfreak Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 I always thought that fighting on a message board is alot like the Special Olympics. Even if you win your still retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Yeah, "I worse." You love Bush, yet Bush proposed a Constitutional Ammendment to ban gay marriage. Apparently you haven't learned the meaning of irony. 580355[/snapback] To claify: that sigline is the result of a lost huddle bet, nothing more. I did not approve this message.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balzac Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Yeah, "I worse." You love Bush, yet Bush proposed a Constitutional Ammendment to ban gay marriage. Apparently you haven't learned the meaning of irony. 580355[/snapback] FYI - that's not irony. I assume you have a dictionary - use it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 you both have some very compelling arguments here... but I would have to say the Pats are a good team, but the Steelers will beat them in the playoffs this year and UT won't be here to take it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 I'm at work, nimrod. People tend to get distracted by real-life concerns while at work. 580358[/snapback] As am I. And my lunch break is now over. Have a nice day, homo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Dick Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Sorry, guys, but until these 2004 Steelers top these 2004 Pats for the AFC title – not in one mid-season game, but for the AFC title – then the Pats are no one's ***. The respective team histories/# of SB rings frankly mean sh*t. To paraphrase Rick Pitino: "Franco Harris isn't walking through that door...Joe Greene isn't walking through that door...Terry Bradshaw isn't walking through that door." The Steelers' past isn't going to help them get them a win in December over this Pats team, should it come to that. PITT is looking awesome right now, and have been firing on all cylinders for the past I-don't-know-how-many weeks, and deserve all the praise and credit they're getting. (And, oddly, I actually like the Steelers.) But the Pats being "their bitches"? Puh-lease. If the Steelers beat the Pats to go to the Super Bowl, I'll gladly say the Steelers are, in the immortal words of another famous Bostonian, "our daddy." Until then, I wouldn't start crowing if I were you...especially after – at the risk of evoking the meaningless history everyone seems so concerned with – we've already rolled over the Steelers once IN THEIR HOUSE on our way to a Lombardi trophy recently, and, the way this season's looking, it might come down to that matchup again, which would be a great AFC final, if you ask me, whether it's at heinz or Gillette. But God help you if it's at Gillette.... 580299[/snapback] msaint-you should know better than to bring thought and analysis into this freak show of a thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSab Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Super Bowl Champion Philadelphia Eagles, has a nice ring to it. Don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 FYI - that's not irony. I assume you have a dictionary - use it. 580367[/snapback] Wrong again. From the American Heritage Dictionary (Third Edition): irony - Incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs. So, according to Pope's sig line, he supports Bush (who doesn't like homosexuals) but also supports gay rights. Funny how much a "dumb hick" knows, isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSab Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Man you guys are tenacious, can't even get a rise out of you? :bigshock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 you both have some very compelling arguments here... but I would have to say the Pats are a good team, but the Steelers will beat them in the playoffs this year and UT won't be here to take it... 580369[/snapback] I hope so, but I'm still not convinced that the Steelers can do it for an entire season. OK, now I REALLY have to get back to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 That avatar is the finest I have seen in many months. I tip my hat to Hugh for the Pens reference. 580262[/snapback] :curtsey: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 So, according to Pope's sig line, he supports Bush (who doesn't like homosexuals) but also supports gay rights. Funny how much a "dumb hick" knows, isn't it? 580393[/snapback] The 'dumb hick' still doesn't have it right. Where in my sigline (written by H8tank) is there support for homosexual rights? More 'purdue doctorate' at work. I think you're a janitor....at purdue. Cleaning up the workstations this morning and afternoon are we? Did you bother to look up hypocrisy while you were straining for irony? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rellen13 Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Aw, c'mon Bill. You don't have to pretend you work just for US. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balzac Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 Wrong again. From the American Heritage Dictionary (Third Edition): irony - Incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs. So, according to Pope's sig line, he supports Bush (who doesn't like homosexuals) but also supports gay rights. Funny how much a "dumb hick" knows, isn't it? 580393[/snapback] ah, so supporting Bush means you support all of his tenets? cool. if that's the case, it's a wonder that anyone ever gets elected. there's no irony in a supporter of bush who also supports gay right. marginal inconsistency? yes. irony? no. what a dumb hick "knows"? you pulled a definition from a dictionary - all that says to me is that you know how to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 hey, most dumb hicks don't know how to read... so being able to read for a dumb hick is actually good... this is not a shot at Bill, just a statement about dumb hicks and their abilities... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSab Posted November 29, 2004 Share Posted November 29, 2004 The funny thing to me is, Philly always gets a bad rap. Out of all the 10 and 1 teams, There is no Eagle thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts