keggerz Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 (edited) twas the night before christmas and all thru the house not a creature was stirring not even a PATS FAN to take a BET Edited January 10, 2005 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 a banishment bet is kind of a dumb way to go, because he'll just come back as Uglier Salmon or something even stupider. You should have made him wear a demoralizing sig-line instead- those types of things usually will irk a childish person like him more than anything else. This way he'll think he's cool even if he loses because he can "beat the system" and come back with a new identity. "Ha-ha I fooled them", etc. etc. That is iF he even honors the terms of any bet, which is unlikely. 648572[/snapback] He already lost a sig bet and welched on it, so another sig bet would be worthless, just like this banishment bet, because he'll welch on that as well. In general, it's pretty much just a waste of time. But dealing with the mentally challenged, while at times frustrating, does build character. So at least I have that going for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 recess must be over they are gone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever in debt to mo lewis Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 ill take the bet ...no points though..its pointless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 what ever the point spread is in the USA today that Grits posts in his weekly PLAYOFF BLITZ THREADI get INDY and the points Tuna gets NE and gives the points NE must COVER for tuna to win PUSH = LOSS INDY must win with or without the points PUSH =LOSS PUSH means Tuna and I could both be gone! Gone = FOREVER! the loser will have a poll created: IE: A: Does "xhuddler" get to stay at thehuddle B: Does "xhuddler" leave thehuddle forever voting will open the day after the game and voting will be closed at 5pm EST on the 1st friday after the game NE/INDY Game! if someone is exhiled they will start their exhile the next day(saturday) at 5pm 648480[/snapback] so this is what you are agreeing to with the changes being: FIDTML gets NE NE must win the game outright Keg gets INDY INDY must win the game outright If NE loses then Mo gets a poll that will determine his fate If INDY loses then I get a poll that will determine my fate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 I have to say that I am really against this type of bet. We already lost one quality Huddler to a bet like this. Why take the risk, Keg? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 I have to say that I am really against this type of bet. We already lost one quality Huddler to a bet like this. Why take the risk, Keg? 648730[/snapback] I guess I just have to hope there are enough people that think i add something to this site to stay.... thats why i made it a poll to decide if someone has to leave... if the masses think the loser should stay then they can stay as you can tell UT wasnt man enough to stand up for his team but "forever in debt" is alteast man enough to stand up and back his team... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 FWIW this isnt a bet that was just about trying to banish UT it was a bet that would let the masses say if they valued someone contribution and if so then they could still stay if they lost the bet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever in debt to mo lewis Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 so this is what you are agreeing to with the changes being: FIDTML gets NE NE must win the game outright Keg gets INDY INDY must win the game outright If NE loses then Mo gets a poll that will determine his fate If INDY loses then I get a poll that will determine my fate 648726[/snapback] sounds good to me...I mean I guess Id prefer a sig line or somethin..but thats fine with me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizards Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Why would admin enforce any bet? Wouldn't they lose subscription fees and be cutting their nose off despite their face????? Make the winner pay for next year's fees and the fees for next year sent and held by DMD???? This guarantees admin involvement and a win win for all...my reasoning is the "any given Sunday" possibility....don't want to see Hugh One go...do not believe UT will honor bet and Hugh will...this is a lose-lose prop and one UT the queery eyed Brady goober smoocher loves..... Change it up Hugh One....he will not honor it....hate to see a bad proposition bet that does nothing for upstanding members of the Huddle(Hugh) and allows smucks to rid us of real FF experience and wisdom...this bet is BS IMO!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizards Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Why would admin enforce any bet? Wouldn't they lose subscription fees and be cutting their nose off despite their face????? Make the winner pay for next year's fees and the fees for next year sent and held by DMD???? This guarantees admin involvement and a win win for all...my reasoning is the "any given Sunday" possibility....don't want to see Hugh One go...do not believe UT will honor bet and Hugh will...this is a lose-lose prop and one UT the queery eyed Brady goober smoocher loves..... Change it up Hugh One....he will not honor it....hate to see a bad proposition bet that does nothing for upstanding members of the Huddle(Hugh) and allows smucks to rid us of real FF experience and wisdom...this bet is BS IMO!!!!! 648752[/snapback] Sorry!! Make the loser pay up front is what I meant not winner!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 Why would admin enforce any bet? Wouldn't they lose subscription fees and be cutting their nose off despite their face????? Make the winner pay for next year's fees and the fees for next year sent and held by DMD???? This guarantees admin involvement and a win win for all...my reasoning is the "any given Sunday" possibility....don't want to see Hugh One go...do not believe UT will honor bet and Hugh will...this is a lose-lose prop and one UT the queery eyed Brady goober smoocher loves..... Change it up Hugh One....he will not honor it....hate to see a bad proposition bet that does nothing for upstanding members of the Huddle(Hugh) and allows smucks to rid us of real FF experience and wisdom...this bet is BS IMO!!!!! 648752[/snapback] I don't see the admins getting into the business of enforcing anybody's bets. I also don't see them getting into the business of "holding" anybody's bet either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 Why would admin enforce any bet? Wouldn't they lose subscription fees and be cutting their nose off despite their face????? Make the winner pay for next year's fees and the fees for next year sent and held by DMD???? This guarantees admin involvement and a win win for all...my reasoning is the "any given Sunday" possibility....don't want to see Hugh One go...do not believe UT will honor bet and Hugh will...this is a lose-lose prop and one UT the queery eyed Brady goober smoocher loves..... Change it up Hugh One....he will not honor it....hate to see a bad proposition bet that does nothing for upstanding members of the Huddle(Hugh) and allows smucks to rid us of real FF experience and wisdom...this bet is BS IMO!!!!! 648752[/snapback] the bet as it was offered and ACCEPTED by UT is that whoever loses has a POLL CREATED to see if they can stay or if they get exhiled.... so if HUGH loses and you dont want him to go then just make sure you vote when the poll is open.... see the reason UT is not gonna honor this bet is that if he loses he will not have enough people in his corner to keep him here because other then mindless drivel and nut licking he adds nothing to thehuddle... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 I don't see the admins getting into the business of enforcing anybody's bets. I also don't see them getting into the business of "holding" anybody's bet either. 648755[/snapback] agree and agree and dont think its necessary ...we all know who are stand up citizens around here and those that are not nuff said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Easy n Dirty Posted January 10, 2005 Share Posted January 10, 2005 (edited) I tried to stay away, but I couldn't. I'm no Ugly Tuna defender by any stretch of the imagination, but why would he ever accept this bet? There's absolutely no risk at all to keggerz or Hugh One or whoever's on the other side of the bet, because reasonable Huddlers will vote in the poll to keep them around. So you're asking ugly Tuna to accept a bet where he risks banishment and has no upside? I agree with a previous poster that banishment bets as a rule are pretty stupid, but this is beyond stupid. And then attempting to hold Ugly Tuna to the terms because he typed "I'll accept this bet with Hugh One' or something like that...c'mon, keggerz, this guy has gotten under your skin way too much if you're resorting to these ridiculous tactics. Let it go, or just make a conventional sig line bet that he can welch on, or whatever, but what you're attemtping to do here is moronic IMHO. Edited January 10, 2005 by Easy n Dirty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted January 10, 2005 Author Share Posted January 10, 2005 I tried to stay away, but I couldn't. I'm no Ugly Tuna defender by any stretch of the imagination, but why would he ever accept this bet? There's absolutely no risk at all to keggerz or Hugh One or whoever's on the other side of the bet, because reasonable Huddlers will vote in the poll to keep them around. So you're asking ugly Tuna to accept a bet where he risks banishment and has no upside? I agree with a previous poster that banishment bets as a rule are pretty stupid, but this is beyond stupid. And then attempting to hold Ugly Tuna to the terms because he typed "I'll accept this bet with Hugh One' or something like that...c'mon, keggerz, this guy has gotten under your skin way too much if you're resorting to these ridiculous tactics. Let it go, or just make a conventional sig line bet that he can welch on, or whatever, but what you're attemtping to do here is moronic IMHO. 648795[/snapback] EnD I never expected him to accept this bet....and that is why I stated it the way as it is...Just want him to get off the soap box and shut up is all by the way congrats on a nice season by the jets Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tbimm Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 you are proposing a bet with Ugly Tuna...and you want to take the Colts WITH POINTS!! wow..you got some balls..right now its like 2.5...whats the point? Im sure Tuna would be real shamed if the Pats won by a point or two huh? 648532[/snapback] Maybe not shamed but gone all the same! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glabra Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 (edited) Somehow, I have this hunch that even if the Colts lose, Hugh won't get many 'against' votes. Just a hunch I mean, dude has only answered 45000 WDIS questions here, and done a good job with merely 44995 of them. Edited January 11, 2005 by Glabra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 So we're on then? Momotard, I mean Uglytuna, confirm please. 648554[/snapback] From what I have seen from UT in the past, he will probably let you know after the game. If it is in his favor, he will respond and say the bet was on because you accepted it. If it is not in his favor, he will say he never confirmed it. I know, I just stated the obvious... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uglytuna Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 I laid the terms of the bet out in my last post. If the admins enforce the bet, there is no way I could even welch the bet nor would Hugh One. I want all the marbles on the table. If Colts win I'm gone.....If Pats win Hugh One is gone.... No simpler then that..... Ugly Tuna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 (edited) UglyTuna is a welsher and a coward. Edited January 11, 2005 by CaptainHook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantasy Jesus Posted January 11, 2005 Share Posted January 11, 2005 If only the Dolphins had covered +13 in week 5 !!! -sigh- So close to getting rid of that jackarse known as UglyTuna back in Week 5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 From what I have seen from UT in the past, he will probably let you know after the game. If it is in his favor, he will respond and say the bet was on because you accepted it. If it is not in his favor, he will say he never confirmed it. I know, I just stated the obvious... 649371[/snapback] Ehhh...bad post by me. I failed to realize this was a bet with a poll at the end to vote if the loser should stay or go. I thought it was for outright banishment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizards Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 I laid the terms of the bet out in my last post. If the admins enforce the bet, there is no way I could even welch the bet nor would Hugh One. I want all the marbles on the table. If Colts win I'm gone.....If Pats win Hugh One is gone.... No simpler then that..... Ugly Tuna 650409[/snapback] UT are you female? Hence the Tuna ID or is that what Big Bubba calls you at yard call in the slam? We have a bet on which one it is...do I "smell" a tuna poll here...oh by the way...if you take "Keggerz" bet....you will get my vote to stay---"NOT"!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phatboy Posted January 12, 2005 Share Posted January 12, 2005 You are all childish and I agree with Easy and Dirty. I also found UTs facts interesting and a good read but too one-sided. I must confess though that there seems to be some history here that the casual Huddle poster (like myself) is not aware of. Have fun waisting your time and energy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.