djryan21 Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Hey All The Vikings looked terrible and I know everyone thinks they're going to bounce back. However, their O-line is in trouble. Plaxico looked pretty good last week and Eli gave him plenty of looks to make big plays. He should have scored on the bomb, but was brought down at the one. Anyone out there think that Nate is deserving the nod over Burress? Thanks in advance. djr. ps. i'll respond to your topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djryan21 Posted September 17, 2005 Author Share Posted September 17, 2005 what'ya think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ts Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Similar yards & catches ... pretty much a coin toss this week, IMO. Try Burleson, MIN will do anything they can to get the passing game back on track in week #2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djryan21 Posted September 17, 2005 Author Share Posted September 17, 2005 thanks ts. burress being on monday night makes it more interesting to stay up and watch. however, i don't think i want to depend on him for getting the points i might need to win it. thanks again djr. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onbrake Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Throw in the Mike Tice factor[ bad coach] and Burress is an easy choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djryan21 Posted September 17, 2005 Author Share Posted September 17, 2005 yeah, he's such the bone head. i dropped moore because who knows how to get out of tice's doghouse. thanks for the reply djr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 I agree with ts ... I'd start Burleson simply because I drafted him in the high mid rounds to be my number 1 or 2 WR. Plaxico was an after thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redcoltfan Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Go with the Viking. They currently DO NOT have much of a running game. Good Luck! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stduke Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Burleson all the way...he's gonna have 100 yards and 2 TD's...just my crystal ball guess. I'm playing him over Driver this week so I hope the magic 8 ball is right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Burleson is a no brainer as far as I'm concerned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 I agree with ts ... I'd start Burleson simply because I drafted him in the high mid rounds to be my number 1 or 2 WR. Plaxico was an after thought. 996754[/snapback] Burleson is a no brainer as far as I'm concerned. 997027[/snapback] I agree with these two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRUISER Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Burleson will have Culpepper throwing to him and Burress will have Eli. That says it all as far as I'm concerned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not Completely Lost Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Burleson has the bigger upside in this matchup. If Palmer can get it together, the Vikes will have to throw to win. The running game just simply sucks!! Vote for Burleson. Would appreciate some help as well: http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?showtopic=109632 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildbluefan Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 Burlesom will torch the Bungles secondary...and they still are the BUNGLES !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunysteelfly76 Posted September 17, 2005 Share Posted September 17, 2005 I'd start Nate Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.