NYpkBLUE22 Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 (edited) 0-4 team trades away Aaron Rodgers, Antonio Brown, Dion Lewis and Vance McDonald 3-1 team trades away Andrew Luck, Keenan Allen, Dalvin Cook and Quincy Enunwa. a lot of the league says it isn’t. What do you guys think? Edited October 3, 2018 by NYpkBLUE22 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Smales Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Yes it looks fine to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heehawks Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Looks great to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Smales Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 15 minutes ago, LordOpie said: Looks like one owner is getting the two best players in the trade? Can't see how that is fair? I cannot figure out who the second best player involved in this trade is. Outside of AB I think you can rank the remaining players a ton of different ways. Unless you are involved in the trade you have no idea how other owners value these guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slambo Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 I think the only opinions that matter in trades are those of the traders involved. Nothing wrong with that trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA_BUDMAN Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 looks like a trade for mostly under performing players giving back a bunch of mostly under performing players. I wonder which players if any will start performing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Well, unless you can prove collusion you really have nothing to stand on. But if you're looking for "fair" vs. "unfair", well... let's break it down Luck / Rodgers: Honestly, I'm not sure which one I'd rather have. Rodgers, despite supposedly being OK in terms of the knee, just doesn't look the same to me. I traded for him in a dynasty league, though. This year... I think Luck might put up better numbers. He has no run game and a crappy D. Probably a wash, but maybe lean Luck a tad. Allen / Brown: Another one that can be considered a wash. Allen really hasn't gotten going yet. Brown is losing a lot of those "big" looks to JuJu. I'd say this is a wash. Lewis / Cook: I'd side with Cook here. Lewis has been getting catches but the carries are dwindling. Enunwa/McDonald: Hard to line up based on different positions, but I'd say this is pretty equal too. If one team needed a TE, even better for them. So yeah, I'm not seeing where the outrage is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shorttynaz Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Pretty even trade if you ask me. People bitching are the ones who look at names and not stats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Smales Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 1 hour ago, LordOpie said: when people ask for an opinion, I like to give one. Fair enough. It's all good. I wasn't trying to call you ou in case it came across that way, just trying to state how people's opinions values of players can vary widely. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Looks fine to me, the other owners should spend their time trying to make trades instead of complaining (questioning the fairness) about the owners that make trades. Some will look at names, and say Rodgers and AB for garbage. But Darin breaks it down well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millworkguy Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 Why did you give us the teams records when asking about a deal? I think, you think the 0-4 team lost and was selling his team to the 3-1 team... I see no issue with the deal either.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYpkBLUE22 Posted October 4, 2018 Author Share Posted October 4, 2018 7 minutes ago, millworkguy said: Why did you give us the teams records when asking about a deal? I think, you think the 0-4 team lost and was selling his team to the 3-1 team... I see no issue with the deal either.... I gave the records because a lot of people made a big deal about the 0-4 team saying he was basically selling his team. The 3-1 guy is known to try and trade rape so I think that influenced people’s opinions but the 0-4 guy actually offered this trade. In MY opinion I think it was a good trade. I believe it worked out for both parties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stethant Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 No concern here for me on the trade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdko Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 0-4 team is getting ripped off 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seahawk3133 Posted October 4, 2018 Share Posted October 4, 2018 The whole key to this trade is if Cook comes back and acts close to where everyone drafted him.. If he does - the 0-4 team makes out like a bandit... If he continues to suck, the they lose out in the deal. I think it is a solid risk for the 0-4 team to take as they need a winning streak bad and Cook could be that difference & if he still sucks - they can't do worse than stay winless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.