Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

NFC West


godtomsatan
 Share

Someone's got to win it!  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. Someone's got to win it!

    • Arizona
      11
    • St. Louis
      23
    • San Francisco
      2
    • Seattle
      10


Recommended Posts

I know what talent is. I also know the Rams owned the Hawks last season. The Seahawks have a good shot at winning the West. I just think the Rams have it a bit easier schedule wise in '05 which gives them a bit of an edge over Seattle.

 

Could very well come down to head-to-head. And well, like I said, the Rams owned the Hawks last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys dont know what talent is I guess. Well the Seahawks have Talent thats why they won last year and thats why we'll win it again.

 

924748[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

Your analysis and knowledge of "why" is...well lacking, but hey here comes the 2nd string so get ready..hey there in a hurry so... :D and ::D -nimrod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know what talent is. I also know the Rams owned the Hawks last season. The Seahawks have a good shot at winning the West. I just think the Rams have it a bit easier schedule wise in '05 which gives them a bit of an edge over Seattle.

 

Could very well come down to head-to-head. And well, like I said, the Rams owned the Hawks last year.

 

924753[/snapback]

 

 

 

Alright I see your point and I do agree it will go down to the wire because it always does with the hawks. But Mathematically we have to beat the rams this season. That sounds kind of dumb but its true. I do feel we can easily beat them if we run with Alexander more and not make mistakes like run for 60 yards and get the ball punched out of your grasps to fumble and lose the game. Or count the rams out in the 4th quarter and keep passing the ball when we can run the clock down. As long as we dont make dumb mistakes were the better team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright I see your point and I do agree it will go down to the wire because it always does with the hawks. But Mathematically we have to beat the rams this season. That sounds kind of dumb but its true. I do feel we can easily beat them if we run with Alexander more and not make mistakes like run for 60 yards and get the ball punched out of your grasps to fumble and lose the game. Or count the rams out in the 4th quarter and keep passing the ball when we can run the clock down. As long as we dont make dumb mistakes were the better team.

 

924795[/snapback]

 

 

 

News flash, momo - EVERYTHING you say sounds dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright I see your point and I do agree it will go down to the wire because it always does with the hawks. But Mathematically we have to beat the rams this season. That sounds kind of dumb but its true. I do feel we can easily beat them if we run with Alexander more and not make mistakes like run for 60 yards and get the ball punched out of your grasps to fumble and lose the game. Or count the rams out in the 4th quarter and keep passing the ball when we can run the clock down. As long as we dont make dumb mistakes were the better team.

 

924795[/snapback]

 

 

 

:D

The Rams could destroy my Hawks if Martz decided to run S. Jackson more than 20 times a game. He is the real deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information