Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

What is evil?


polksalet
 Share

Recommended Posts

I do not mean give an example of something which is evil. I mean what is your standard of something being evil. Is it rooted in the bible, Hegel, postmodern philosophy, or perhaps it is like porn, you know it when you see it.

 

Discuss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Can probably classify it a couple of ways which are very different from each other...

 

Natural evil - just sad circumstances, such as a young child dying in a tornado.

 

Moral evil - deliberate conscious thoughts/actions (or lack thereof when necessary) which directly results in a deviation from the good or sacred. So in a sense it cannot be defined without the standard of a good to compare it to.

 

Obviously there is a lot more to it than that... but that's my quick and incomplete version. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Chappy

When I think of evil I think of something that happens that is never for a good reason and only meant to hurt, be cruel, etc. For instance, some might think of lying, stealing, cheating and something as severe as killing someone else as being evil. However, I can think of circumstances where each of those could be warranted. One thing that I can think of right off the top of my head that is pure evil is rape.

 

Thinking of others...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This may be a little more than you're asking, but it's my general philosophy on good & evil and the way things (in my mind) work in the universe...and if you believe, what makes the difference in who goes to Heaven & who goes to Hell.

 

You know it when you see it. I feel that everyone inherently knows the difference between right & wrong. When you choose to do the wrong thing it is evil. Very simplistic I know and most would say there are gray areas and levels of good & bad, but I can only tell you how I feel. Evil get the best of all of us at times. I think how you deal with you wrong-doings and impurities as it seems is how you're judged in the afterlife, if you believe in such a thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hmmm, polk put forth a thought provoking question...interesting.

 

I do not think simply doing wrong is evil. I know it is wrong to speed but I still do it on occasion. I don't see that as evil. I guess for me there has to be a malicious or malevolent intent, or the knowledge that by your actions, great harm/hurt will befall others.

 

Those are my initial thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Chappy
hmmm, polk put forth a thought provoking question...interesting.

 

I do not think simply doing wrong is evil. I know it is wrong to speed but I still do it on occasion. I don't see that as evil. I guess for me there has to be a malicious or malevolent intent, or the knowledge that by your actions, great harm/hurt will befall others.

 

Those are my initial thoughts.

 

That goes right along with what I've said. There are things/rules out there that if we broke would be considered wrong/evil. However, there are many occasions where if we broke the rules we'd be doing good. Take your speeding example for instance. Normally speeding is bad, however if you were speeding to bring a person who was just in a terrible accident to the hospital to get help that could never be considered a bad thing, rather as being heroic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can probably classify it a couple of ways which are very different from each other...

 

Natural evil - just sad circumstances, such as a young child dying in a tornado.

 

Moral evil - deliberate conscious thoughts/actions (or lack thereof when necessary) which directly results in a deviation from the good or sacred. So in a sense it cannot be defined without the standard of a good to compare it to.

 

Obviously there is a lot more to it than that... but that's my quick and incomplete version. :wacko:

 

i would say that's a pretty good summation of where i stand...except i'm not sure about the "requiring a standard of good" part. i think you could define "moral evil" simply by malicious intent, which doesn't necessarily require you to define "good" first. in other words, i think it would be reasonable to say, "intentionally harming others is evil, regardless of how you define good."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would say that's a pretty good summation of where i stand...except i'm not sure about the "requiring a standard of good" part. i think you could define "moral evil" simply by malicious intent, which doesn't necessarily require you to define "good" first. in other words, i think it would be reasonable to say, "intentionally harming others is evil, regardless of how you define good."

 

My point is just that even "intentionally harming" someone can be hard to define... so if being healthy and happy is the good, then harming someone's health or happiness could be said to be a deviation from that good. I think we're pretty much saying the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Chappy
i would say that's a pretty good summation of where i stand...except i'm not sure about the "requiring a standard of good" part. i think you could define "moral evil" simply by malicious intent, which doesn't necessarily require you to define "good" first. in other words, i think it would be reasonable to say, "intentionally harming others is evil, regardless of how you define good."

 

 

My point is just that even "intentionally harming" someone can be hard to define... so if being healthy and happy is the good, then harming someone's health or happiness could be said to be a deviation from that good. I think we're pretty much saying the same thing.

 

What if a situation arose in which you intentionally harmed/killed someone only because they were trying to kill you (because that would've made them happy) therefore doing it out of self-defense? That certainly couldn't be considered evil, but would deviate from being good. :wacko:

Edited by Chappy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What if a situation arose in which you intentionally harmed/killed someone only because they were trying to kill you (because that would've made them happy) therefore doing it out of self-defense? That certainly couldn't be considered evil, but would deviate from being good. :wacko:

Probably not evil... unless you thereafter assumed a new identity to hide from your past actions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evil = knowingly doing something selfish , hurtful towards others or yourself , for your own personal motives or gain , with the full disregard to what is good , morally correct and what is right

 

 

 

 

For me personally , as a Christian , and as i have said a few times in various threads , it is not only the action but the motive behind the action that helps constitute if something is evil , sinfulor wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Chappy
Probably not evil... unless you thereafter assumed a new identity to hide from your past actions.

 

If it truly is self defense, assuming a new identity wouldn't be necessary.

 

Evil = knowingly doing something selfish , hurtful towards others or yourself , for your own personal motives or gain , with the full disregard to what is good , morally correct and what is right

For me personally , as a Christian , and as i have said a few times in various threads , it is not only the action but the motive behind the action that helps constitute if something is evil , sinful or wrong

 

Excellent point.

Edited by Chappy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it truly is self defense, assuming a new identity wouldn't be necessary.

I agree. That'd be the act of a coward with a guilty conscience looking to pretend the past never happened. Acts of true self defense don't need to be hidden from scrutiny.

Edited by yo mama
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Chappy
I disagree. That'd be the act of a coward with a guilty conscience looking to pretend the past never happened. Acts of true self defense don't need to be hidden from scrutiny.

 

Completely agree, that's why I said assuming a new identity isn't necessary. Even if the person committing the crime isn't in the right they shouldn't assume a new identity and face the music as is.

 

Clubfoot just added a solid point perspective also plays a large role.

Edited by Chappy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

wurd

 

what is evil to sum is not evil to others

 

completely disagree

 

by your assessment if one person feels that taking a gun and shooting innocent people is not evil , then he / she can go ahead and do it

 

evil is evil by its definition ...people can choose to ignore good and do evil but that does not make it acceptable or change the fact that it is evil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

completely disagree

 

by your assessment if one person feels that taking a gun and shooting innocent people is not evil , then he / she can go ahead and do it

 

evil is evil by its definition ...people can choose to ignore good and do evil but that does not make it acceptable or change the fact that it is evil

bad example but for the simple people it works

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information