Front Row Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 (edited) As we can now see the constitution is under attack , along with your second amendment rights. No matter how you feel about the NRA, if you value your freedom now is the time to be counted.More than ever before, no excuses; protect YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. Please forward this to anyone who is not already a member. FREE NRA MEMBERSHIP Edited March 26, 2009 by Front Row Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evil_gop_liars Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 I would recommend joining NRA, PETA and Greepeace. One tin foil hat fits all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 As we can now see the constitution is under attack Now under attack? Really? I thought the last guy in charge finally did away with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 It's always struck me as funny that people look the other way re the 4th amendment but now panties are in a wad over the second. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 This is solicitation spam and should be locked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Front Row Posted March 26, 2009 Author Share Posted March 26, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Front Row Posted March 26, 2009 Author Share Posted March 26, 2009 This is solicitation spam and should be locked. Just sharing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_am_the_swammi Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 This is solicitation spam and should be locked. That, and the fact that its insulting to those even marginally educated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Front Row Posted March 26, 2009 Author Share Posted March 26, 2009 That, and the fact that its insulting to those even marginally educated. I am marginally insulted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 It's always struck me as funny that people look the other way re the 4th amendment but now panties are in a wad over the second. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Since...725am PST March 26, 2009. Good to know! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Since...725am PST March 26, 2009. Good to know! You should watch the video. It's got some very interesting legal information regarding your 4th amendment rights. And for the record, I did not find that video at 725am PST on March 26, 2009. Your perception, not my timeframe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westvirginia Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 It's always struck me as funny that people look the other way re the 4th amendment but now panties are in a wad over the second. That's something that I've NEVER understood. People only worry about the rights that directly affect them. Maybe we ARE too self-centered as a society to survive? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
driveby Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Texans would be allowed to stow their guns and ammo inside their locked cars or trucks while at work and parked on employer property under a controversial bill passed Wednesday by the state Senate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 You should watch the video. It's got some very interesting legal information regarding your 4th amendment rights. And for the record, I did not find that video at 725am PST on March 26, 2009. Your perception, not my timeframe I actually got about 5 minutes into it and headed to work. I was surprised that it looked decently constructed for what might very well be a student project. I wonder if we could send this to Jose Padilla? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Texans would be allowed to stow their guns and ammo inside their locked cars or trucks while at work and parked on employer property under a controversial bill passed Wednesday by the state Senate. From the article “Here in Texas people like their firearms and … if they want to bring them to the workplace they are going to do it whether there’s an employee policy against it or not,” said state Sen. Glenn Hegar, R-Katy, the measure’s author. “This is designed to stop employers from punishing employees who legally bring weapons to work .” Sort of stupid to think that someone cannot have a gun out of sight in a locked car. There's been plenty of times in the past that I have been going to the range or out hunting after work. We even used to run out to the range during lunch in Sacramento. This is a law that really means nothing one way or the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 From the article Sort of stupid to think that someone cannot have a gun out of sight in a locked car. There's been plenty of times in the past that I have been going to the range or out hunting after work. We even used to run out to the range during lunch in Sacramento. This is a law that really means nothing one way or the other. True enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 From the article Sort of stupid to think that someone cannot have a gun out of sight in a locked car. There's been plenty of times in the past that I have been going to the range or out hunting after work. We even used to run out to the range during lunch in Sacramento. This is a law that really means nothing one way or the other. Agreed. Besides, Texas (or any other state) is free to do as it chooses when it comes to gun de/regulation. This has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment; that's a leash on the Fed only. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Agreed. Besides, Texas (or any other state) is free to do as it chooses when it comes to gun de/regulation. This has nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment; that's a leash on the Fed only. The second amendment also has nothing to do with corporate policy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 The second amendment also has nothing to do with corporate policy. Couldn't agree more. Though what if the employer at issue is the federal government itself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 From the article Sort of stupid to think that someone cannot have a gun out of sight in a locked car. There's been plenty of times in the past that I have been going to the range or out hunting after work. We even used to run out to the range during lunch in Sacramento. This is a law that really means nothing one way or the other. Heard about that yesterday. I may be on the fence in terms of certain gun issues, but this is ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Couldn't agree more. Though what if the employer at issue is the federal government itself? That is an interesting question. I would assume the Federal Government is specifically governed by Federal law, no? But then, an employer policy of "no guns at work" that could result in termination isn't a law, and breaking it doesn't incur a civil or criminal penalty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 That is an interesting question. I would assume the Federal Government is specifically governed by Federal law, no? But then, an employer policy of "no guns at work" that could result in termination isn't a law, and breaking it doesn't incur a civil or criminal penalty. Arguably a "no guns at work" policy infringes on your right to bear arms; at least your right to bear arms in the work place. And "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It doesn't say, "except in the workplace." Interesting hypo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted March 26, 2009 Share Posted March 26, 2009 Arguably a "no guns at work" policy infringes on your right to bear arms; at least your right to bear arms in the work place. And "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It doesn't say, "except in the workplace." Interesting hypo. So, are you saying that "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" could be applied to a body outside of the Federal Government, including "unofficial" bodies such as corporations? I'm not asking if you think it should be as much as I am asking if you are suggesting that the Constitutional protection against infringement could be interpreted as applying elsewhere than the Fed Gov. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.