PantherDave Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 As some of you know, I mentioned Drew Carter as a deep sleeper in the PS, and Fox has let him have some playing time the last few weeks, which leaves me to believe that Colbert will become the possesion WR next year, and Carter will become the new #2 behind Smith. I hope it happens, because this kid has upside galore, and is even faster than Smitty(actually the fastest Panther). I would love for him to shine next season and for the remainder of the PO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PantherDave Posted January 10, 2006 Author Share Posted January 10, 2006 ..and why he is not a WR, I've kept my eye on Ben Watson, who is headed for stud TE status I believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 ..and why he is not a WR, I've kept my eye on Ben Watson, who is headed for stud TE status I believe. 1257035[/snapback] While Watson has his place on the Pats, for the last four years there have been no players used often enough to become a "top player" other than Brady. The passing scheme has never focused on any one player enough to make them a "stud" so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PantherDave Posted January 10, 2006 Author Share Posted January 10, 2006 (edited) While Watson has his place on the Pats, for the last four years there have been no players used often enough to become a "top player" other than Brady. The passing scheme has never focused on any one player enough to make them a "stud" so far. 1257038[/snapback] I agree, but it seems that Brady has gone to him more of lately, but then again, it could be because of the attention that Branch and Givens get as well. Edited January 10, 2006 by PantherDave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 He may be considered a big gun already but I think Housh may be even better next year.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolly Rodgers Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Obviously I'm a homer here, but Michael Clayton might be a sleeper pick because he had such a bad season. He was injured coming into camp and then got hurt again during the season. If he is healthy then lookout, he should put up big numbers. Also, TE Alex Smith on the Bucs should break out next season. He was a rookie and actually was second in rookie receptions this season, behind Mark Clayton. He is a beast in the passing game and should be a great tight end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PantherDave Posted January 10, 2006 Author Share Posted January 10, 2006 TJ arrived this year in my book. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runner Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Obviously I'm a homer here, but Michael Clayton might be a sleeper pick because he had such a bad season. He was injured coming into camp and then got hurt again during the season. If he is healthy then lookout, he should put up big numbers. Also, TE Alex Smith on the Bucs should break out next season. He was a rookie and actually was second in rookie receptions this season, behind Mark Clayton. He is a beast in the passing game and should be a great tight end. 1257085[/snapback] Michael Clayton is DONE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolly Rodgers Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 (edited) Michael Clayton is DONE. 1257105[/snapback] Care to explain that very insightful comment? Any information to back this up? Edited January 10, 2006 by Jolly Rodgers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hated-By-Many Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 ..and why he is not a WR, I've kept my eye on Ben Watson, who is headed for stud TE status I believe. 1257035[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PantherDave Posted January 10, 2006 Author Share Posted January 10, 2006 1257112[/snapback] See i don't hate, just ribb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runner Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 (edited) Care to explain that very insitful comment? Any information to back this up? 1257109[/snapback] I think you meant "insightful", but... No need to elaborate on the obvious. Clayton's numbers last year were a fluke. Galloway is obviously the better, faster, receiver who Simms looks to all the time. Plus, isn't Clayton allegedly lazy? I wish I had a crystal ball to "back up" my instinct, but my prediction will have to be good enough. I do know that Clayton was probably a Top-3 bust this year. I don't know what Tampa will do to make Clayton drastically improved next year, or even a "sleeper" candidate. You can have him. I'll gamble elsewhere. Are you happy now? Edited January 10, 2006 by Runner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Care to explain that very insitful comment? Any information to back this up? 1257109[/snapback] I saw him make a tackle on a kickoff. That tells me how high Gruden is on him when he sends his "stud" downfield to cover kickoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Talker Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Which WR will emerge next year? Reggie Brown is my choice. He gained valuable starter experience as a rookie and will be more consistent in his sophomore season. Playing TO's old spot and with a healthy McNabb throwing to him, I think the sky's the limit with this guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolly Rodgers Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 (edited) I think you meant "insightful", but... No need to elaborate on the obvious. Clayton's numbers last year were a fluke. Galloway is obviously the better, faster, receiver who Simms looks to all the time. Plus, isn't Clayton allegedly lazy? I wish I had a crystal ball to "back up" my instinct, but my prediction will have to be good enough. I do know that Clayton was probably a Top-3 bust this year. I don't know what Tampa will do to make Clayton drastically improved next year, or even a "sleeper" candidate. You can have him. I'll gamble elsewhere. Are you happy now? 1257140[/snapback] Clayton was injured all year. If you read my earlier post you would know this. He wont be injured next year and people like you who are all down on him will overlook him, making him a sleeper pick. Tampa does not have to do anything to make him better he just has to get healthy. Oh and yes Galloway is the faster reciever and is a seasoned vet. However, I dont think you can compare the two the way you are because last year Galloway was hurt and Clayton had a great year. So whats the difference smart guy? Oh and I would love for you to find some information confirming Clayton is lazy. Edited January 10, 2006 by Jolly Rodgers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Which WR will emerge next year? Reggie Brown is my choice. He gained valuable starter experience as a rookie and will be more consistent in his sophomore season. Playing TO's old spot and with a healthy McNabb throwing to him, I think the sky's the limit with this guy. 1257157[/snapback] I like this choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runner Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Clayton was injured all year. If you read my earlier post you would know this. He wont be injured next year and people like you who are all down on him will overlook him, making him a sleeper pick. Tampa does not have to do anything to make him better he just has to get healthy. Oh and yes Galloway is the faster reciever and is a seasoned vet. However, I dont think you can compare the two the way you are because last year Galloway was hurt and Clayton had a great year. So whats the difference smart guy? Oh and I would love for you to find some information confirming Clayton is lazy. 1257169[/snapback] Okay, you're right... He's the best receiver in the league. He has all the tools, the right mindset, and the perfect system to make him a top-3 receiver. His injuries hurt his production all year. He's great. Happy now? P.S. I'll make sure I don't forget to pencil him in on my "sleeper" list. PPS. Clayton is a bum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jolly Rodgers Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Okay, you're right... He's the best receiver in the league. He has all the tools, the right mindset, and the perfect system to make him a top-3 receiver. His injuries hurt his production all year. He's great. Happy now? P.S. I'll make sure I don't forget to pencil him in on my "sleeper" list. PPS. Clayton is a bum 1257179[/snapback] And you're a tool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runner Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 And you're a tool. 1257182[/snapback] Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
URLACHERisGOD Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Michael Clayton 1257085[/snapback] If you meant to say Mark Clayton, then I believe you are right on! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebartender Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Either Porter or Burleson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furd Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Mark Clayton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Berrian of the Bears. Don't laugh, they'll have a proper offense next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Berrian of the Bears. Don't laugh, they'll have a proper offense next year. 1257248[/snapback] Don't forget they will have Mark Bradley coming back. He had five catches for 88 yards in the final game before injuring his knee. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted January 10, 2006 Share Posted January 10, 2006 Don't forget they will have Mark Bradley coming back. He had five catches for 88 yards in the final game before injuring his knee. 1257274[/snapback] I know - but how good will his knee be? I like Berrian. Then again, I liked Marty Booker too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.