H8tank Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Who do you take? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrobn26 Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 (edited) Where's Grossman? I voted Delhomme, but Jake 'the fake' is a close second. Edited January 17, 2006 by rocknrobn26 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shotgun Messiahs Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Where's Grossman? 1270359[/snapback] Probably having a drink with Mark Brunell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrobn26 Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Probably having a drink with Mark Brunell. 1270361[/snapback] Or a snort of Nitrous? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goopster24 Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 I think you gotta take Delhomme. He has proven that he can step up in the face of pressure. I would put Roethlisberger right there with him though; he has grown up very, very quickly. Plummer is a good QB but makes questionable decisions at times. There is something I just don't like about Hasselbeck... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tally Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Anyone but Plummer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunysteelfly76 Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooGie Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 (edited) I gotta take Delhomme. Not because I'm a homer. But because Delhomme just seems to have a special something inside of him that shines when it's all on the line. Look back at the 2nd half of SB 38...The first half sucked, and he needed to have a big second half, and he delivered a whale of a second half. Look at last year, no chance of playoffs unless they win oh...7 straight? He wins 7 straight for them. (obviously they didn't make it, but they had a chance if they win in the last few games) It seems like he just has a focus for the game that only appears when it's "now or never". It's shown so far this year, mostly starting the second half of the year (which is normal for him) and becoming REALLY apparent in the playoffs... edit: the more i think about it, it's like a little "mini-favre" type thing...anyone know what i mean? Edited January 17, 2006 by LooGie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Front Row Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 I agree with Loog, Delhomme has the edge on H-beck because of his past performances. That being said I think H-beck could step up and have a big game this week as he has a few more weapons at his disposal than does Jake. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 edit: the more i think about it, it's like a little "mini-favre" type thing...anyone know what i mean? 1270759[/snapback] I mentioned that the other day - he's a gunslinger. Favrelite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charty Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Delhomme based on his 5-1 playoff record and what LooGie said. How can anyone pick a guy that makes an OT coinflip prediction and then proceeds to hand the ball to GB for the game winning interception? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NAUgrad Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 I really like Delhomme, but think that S. Smith makes him special. Having said that, I think Hass. has even better weapons as a whole that make him just a little better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duchess Jack Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 I really like Delhomme, but think that S. Smith makes him special. Having said that, I think Hass. has even better weapons as a whole that make him just a little better. 1270885[/snapback] you cannot deny that Smith makes him special - but what about last year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NAUgrad Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 (edited) you cannot deny that Smith makes him special - but what about last year? 1270900[/snapback] Good point. Mush is a good receiver but no where near S. Smith. I still think Seattle's weapons make him just a notch better. If Delhomme were QB of Seattle, would the offense be better? Maybe so. Edited January 17, 2006 by NAUgrad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PSULions Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 I agree with Loog, Delhomme has the edge on H-beck because of his past performances. That being said I think H-beck could step up and have a big game this week as he has a few more weapons at his disposal than does Jake. 1270855[/snapback] As a Panthers homer, I agree, but I also agree about your comments about Hasselbeck too. He played great last week when SAlex went down and showed he can put his team on his back. I hope we are able to shut him down next week, but the Seahawks will be tough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Delhomme gets hyped up for games and says he doesn't want to calm down. Someone like that is my pick among those 4. I like Hasselbeck next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 I know I am a homer, but, my vote is for Ben Roethlisberger. http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/NFL/PRAT/2005/post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Trick Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Sorry, I'm taking Big Ben, he is a good leader, wins when he's in there and completes a high number of passes. To me he has all the intangibles to be around a long time in this league. It's not everyday a second year guy accomplishes as much as he already has and he continues to get better. He just knows how to win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 Sorry, I'm taking Big Ben, he is a good leader, wins when he's in there and completes a high number of passes. To me he has all the intangibles to be around a long time in this league. It's not everyday a second year guy accomplishes as much as he already has and he continues to get better. He just knows how to win. 1271813[/snapback] Shhhh. You aren't supposed to believe what you see. He is just getting lucky and is simply a "system" QB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skylive5 Posted January 17, 2006 Share Posted January 17, 2006 (edited) Poor Jake P.... he just gets no respect. After last weeks upgrade of game when Alexander went down... I have to go with Hass. Think Hass wants it reeeeaaalll baaaad! Edited to add a P. So darn many Jakes around...... Edited January 17, 2006 by skylive5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawk37 Posted January 18, 2006 Share Posted January 18, 2006 How can anyone pick a guy that makes an OT coinflip prediction and then proceeds to hand the ball to GB for the game winning interception? 1270878[/snapback] LIVE IN THE NOW. Hasselbeck is way better then he was in the 2003 season. He is making a lot better decisions and has protected the ball a lot more. Only 9 interceptions during the regular season pretty much explains it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooGie Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 I mentioned that the other day - he's a gunslinger. Favrelite 1270877[/snapback] I never really thought about it before, until I typed that. They both sort of play like kids in the park. For the love of the game. No holds barred. Albeit Favre might have the upper hand there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooGie Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 you cannot deny that Smith makes him special - but what about last year? 1270900[/snapback] exactly. Moose was not the superstar Smith is, and he was still the #1 WR. If there's anything to criticize about Delhomme, it's he has a habit (good or bad, however you want to look at it) of wanting to goto only 1 reciever. I equate that with lack of faith in the other WR's being able to make a play of either Smiths or Moose's caliber. Smith just gets open, even with 2 guys on him, and even with all the attraction to his side of the field, the others STILL can't get open. Now Carter is stepping up, i think he's gonna be the man next year. Err...second man i guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooGie Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 LIVE IN THE NOW. Hasselbeck is way better then he was in the 2003 season. He is making a lot better decisions and has protected the ball a lot more. Only 9 interceptions during the regular season pretty much explains it. 1272794[/snapback] Jeez, you're living in the now enough for all of us bud. We get it. You wish a SEAHAWK was your daddy. It doesn't matter which one. ANY ONE!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawk37 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 loogie you got issues. What kind of name is loogie anyways. I just like for Seattle to get respect we deserve. Hasselbeck is by far the best QB out there and is more like Favre then Delhomme. Hasselbeck has learned from Favre and has the same stats as Favre did in his 5th year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.