jaxfactor Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 It certainly doesn't look like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 It certainly doesn't look like it. They were just as bad against the Bears last week. The difference is that the Skins can actually take advantage of turnovers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 (edited) This is what happens when Mediocre teams face the NFC east Edited December 24, 2007 by whomper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperCharger Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Jackson looks horrible. He reminds me of Vick, which is not a good thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosGatosEnFuegos Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 I need something out of their defense to make LT not need to carry my team tomorrow night. They've been a big let down this far. Not what I was expecting. Hopefully for them, and me, they'll turn things up in the second half. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 I need something out of their defense to make LT not need to carry my team tomorrow night. They've been a big let down this far. Not what I was expecting. Hopefully for them, and me, they'll turn things up in the second half. +1 I'm in exactly the same boat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebellab Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 I am struggling tonight. I have been a Vikes fan all my life, I am in my Championship with my opponent having Minnesota D and Chestor Taylor playing. At the half, I am 21 points ahead. I can't believe I am rooting against my homer team. God I hate FF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Miscreant Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 I need something out of their defense to make LT not need to carry my team tomorrow night. They've been a big let down this far. Not what I was expecting. Hopefully for them, and me, they'll turn things up in the second half. +1 I'm in exactly the same boat. I'm looking at the same guys from another angle. I got AP/AD going tonight and a 13 point lead and my superbowl competition has LT tomorrow night. I'm pretty sure I need more than a 14 pt cushion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gdawg Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Brad Childress has a job why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbie Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 The Vikes have a lot going for them. But, they are not a team that can catch up from two scores down...at least not against a decent team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Only a TD w/2pt conversion and a FG behind now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxfactor Posted December 24, 2007 Author Share Posted December 24, 2007 Brad Childress has a job why? Exactly. They scored anyway, but first and goal from the 5 and you're throwing the ball with AD sitting on the sidelines. What a moran. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaxfactor Posted December 24, 2007 Author Share Posted December 24, 2007 Only a TD w/2pt conversion and a FG behind now. Childress is still an idiot though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosGatosEnFuegos Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Can you really challenge that there were 12 men on the field? If you can, why can't you challenge false starts, etc? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosGatosEnFuegos Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 That really seems like total bullsh!t. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Can you really challenge that there were 12 men on the field? If you can, why can't you challenge false starts, etc? 12 men is easily deduced on a replay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Childress is still an idiot though. He's just been thoroughly outcoached by Ancient Joe Gibbs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gdawg Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Childress should have thrown the flag on the Moss reception, he waited too long. Idiot. Brian Billick West. Another moran that shouldn't have a job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosGatosEnFuegos Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 12 men is easily deduced on a replay So is whether the O-line or D-line jumped first. It just seems ridiculous to me that you can challenge one penalty but not others. Are there any others at all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Square Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 12 men is easily deduced on a replay And offsides can't? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gdawg Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 So is whether the O-line or D-line jumped first. It just seems ridiculous to me that you can challenge one penalty but not others. Are there any others at all? SInce those plays cannot be reviewed, gonna go with "no". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 Dwight Smith demonstrates yet again that he is not fit to be in the NFL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 And offsides can't? Not always ... camera angles are important on those types of calls Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosGatosEnFuegos Posted December 24, 2007 Share Posted December 24, 2007 SInce those plays cannot be reviewed, gonna go with "no". Huh? What are "those plays"? Are you saying that there isn't another penalty that can be challenged? Or are you saying that you can't challenge offsides/false start? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.