masterwing Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 (edited) Thermite. Fricken nano thermite. What the heck is up with that? Edited September 28, 2009 by masterwing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt770 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Thermite. Fricken nano thermite. What the heck is up with that? Wrong forum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterwing Posted September 28, 2009 Author Share Posted September 28, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiegie Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 I'm with you, Mr. Truther. There ain't no way that this collapse happened without thermite: link Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterwing Posted September 28, 2009 Author Share Posted September 28, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 The dude is an architect, It would be much more believable if it was an engineer spouting out that crap. Most architects don't know the difference between their ass and a hole in the ground when it comes to structural issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt770 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 The people spouting conspiracy hogwash are always fringe nutjobs with no proof, and the people who believe them are always the gullible, attention-seeking types. DFTT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajncajn Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Something I never understood is how implausible it is that a airliner filled with aviation fuel slamming into a building might collapse it. I think all these conspiracy theorists are doing a great disservice to the people who died and have ulterior motives of their own. It amazes me how anyone can get on TV and make whatever claim they want & masses of people actually believe it without question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westvirginia Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 The people spouting conspiracy hogwash are always fringe nutjobs with no proof, and the people who believe them are always the gullible, attention-seeking types. DFTT As much grief as I get, I tend to agree. The only conspiracy to me that remotely rings true is the JFK one - and that's because he supposedly was an incredible shooter but chose a freakin' Carcano to do the job with. As a rule politicians are way too monomaniacal to keep their mouths shut about something like this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furd Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Did you ever use your cell phone to open your garage door, remotely? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajncajn Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Did you ever use your cell phone to open your garage door, remotely? No, but I can open a car door with a tennis ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Have to agree here!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Beatings Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 The only part of the 9/11 conspiracy theories that intrigues me is the Pentagon wreckage. The photos of that wreckage in particular seem oddly inconsistent with everything else. I don't believe that the Twin Towers attacks were anything but terrorism. Same with the crash in Pennsylvania. But a part of me still wonders about the Pentagon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chester Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 The only part of the 9/11 conspiracy theories that intrigues me is the Pentagon wreckage. The photos of that wreckage in particular seem oddly inconsistent with everything else. I don't believe that the Twin Towers attacks were anything but terrorism. Same with the crash in Pennsylvania. But a part of me still wonders about the Pentagon. A conspiracy to happen at the exact same time as 3 terrorist attacks? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 The only part of the 9/11 conspiracy theories that intrigues me is the Pentagon wreckage. The photos of that wreckage in particular seem oddly inconsistent with everything else. I don't believe that the Twin Towers attacks were anything but terrorism. Same with the crash in Pennsylvania. But a part of me still wonders about the Pentagon. you should take immediate action to gouge that part of you out with a butter knife, dude. seriously. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 you should take immediate action to gouge that part of you out with a butter knife, dude. seriously. I am surprised at you . . . I thought all Broncos fans are well versed with conspiracy theories about how McDaniels ran Cutler out of town and the "phantom" text and phone messages to Bowlen . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicCEO Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Did you know that you can make everything you'd ever need... food, clothes, structures, electronics, fuel... all out of hemp you can grow in your yard? The fat cats and the corporate head honchos don't want you to know about this, man! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 I am surprised at you . . . I thought all Broncos fans are well versed with conspiracy theories about how McDaniels ran Cutler out of town and the "phantom" text and phone messages to Bowlen . . . wow, that is funny! you sure got me!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterwing Posted September 28, 2009 Author Share Posted September 28, 2009 Building 7 was not hit by a plane. Silverstein pulled it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterwing Posted September 28, 2009 Author Share Posted September 28, 2009 But thats not proof I admit. Thermite and molten metal are though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiegie Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Building 7 was not hit by a plane. Silverstein pulled it. I always knew we couldn't trust him. :mad: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicCEO Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Building 7 was not hit by a plane. Silverstein pulled it. That sounds like a jew name. Coincidence? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterwing Posted September 28, 2009 Author Share Posted September 28, 2009 I shouldnt have brought up Silverstein. He owns the trade center. Thats all Ill say. Nano thermite HAS been found in the dust. Do you know what that means? It means there is some serious expaining to do. NANO Thermite is not in buildings, or planes, or caves. EVER It could explain the unexplainable and sometimes denied molten metal that was found weeks after the collapse...thermite produces and melts metal. That should be enough to "question" the official story. I questioned it first when i saw Building 7 collapse(almost the size of the IDS tower in mpls,mn) and then realized they omitted it completely from the 9-11 report. That seemed odd if anything. That was a few years ago now. I could go on for a while, but Nano Thermite in the debris is messed up. Im shocked no one cares. Im 29 years old. Im completely normal with a full time job as a chef. Ive lived with my girlfriend for 8 years now. I owe zero money to anyone. I am as patriotic as they come, and that is why i am questioning the story. Im sorry to have offended you. Truly Tony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicCEO Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 I shouldnt have brought up Silverstein. He owns the trade center. Thats all Ill say. Nano thermite HAS been found in the dust. Do you know what that means? It means there is some serious expaining to do. NANO Thermite is not in buildings, or planes, or caves. EVER It could explain the unexplainable and sometimes denied molten metal that was found weeks after the collapse...thermite produces and melts metal. That should be enough to "question" the official story. I questioned it first when i saw Building 7 collapse(almost the size of the IDS tower in mpls,mn) and then realized they omitted it completely from the 9-11 report. That seemed odd if anything. That was a few years ago now. I could go on for a while, but Nano Thermite in the debris is messed up. Im shocked no one cares. Im 29 years old. Im completely normal with a full time job as a chef. Ive lived with my girlfriend for 8 years now. I owe zero money to anyone. I am as patriotic as they come, and that is why i am questioning the story. Im sorry to have offended you. Truly Tony 1. Post a reliable link to the thermite thing. 2. You know what else melts metal? Really hot fire. Ask a blacksmith. 3. Building 7 was severely damaged by the collapse of the other towers. Read something other than conspiracy sites for info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.