URLACHERisGOD Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 I'm liking #1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziachild007 Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 And you're in the HOF League?!?! And that's why you're in the Practice Squad. Sure Portis has some injury questions right now. But if he stays healthy and takes at least 2/3 of the Betts/Portis totals, then team 4 should end up with 3 top 18 RBs. I don't see why Green would do any worse than last year, considering he missed 2 games and will probably see as many if not more dump off passes with the Texans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 To me it boils down to either 2 or 5. I'd probably have to give the edge to #5, no pun intended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaumont Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Sure Portis has some injury questions right now. But if he stays healthy and takes at least 2/3 of the Betts/Portis totals, then team 4 should end up with 3 top 18 RBs. I don't see why Green would do any worse than last year, considering he missed 2 games and will probably see as many if not more dump off passes with the Texans. I like where your head is ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaumont Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 If injury history is a sign, team #4 might have its hands full. Meh, I am in it to win it ... injury history be damned. If my boys stay healthy I will lay waste to this league ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaumont Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Another way to put it folks is No .4 is bringing on the 9 (Bush), 10 (Green) and 11 (Portis) returning 2006 weekly average RBs ... I am willing to accept the injury risk ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaumont Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 (edited) Taking myself from consideration, I like Travis Henry, Thomas Jones, Deuce McAllister ... Group 3 has some real umphhh to it ... I see this as 3 top 18 RBs ... Edited August 6, 2007 by Beaumont Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Beatings Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 You can start 3 RB's each week in this league (2 RB's and 1 Flex position which can be a RB). My strategy with Group 1 was to look for situations where the NFL team's starting RB would be as featured as possible (as opposed to some of the more RBBC heavy teams out there). I pretty much hate drafting from the middle of the pack like I had to here (#6 spot). I took some risks... we'll see if they pay off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peepinmofo Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Taking myself from consideration, I like Travis Henry, Thomas Jones, Deuce McAllister ... Group 3 has some real umphhh to it ... I see this as 3 top 18 RBs ... Aww shux... That means a lot to me. hahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDFFFreak Posted August 6, 2007 Author Share Posted August 6, 2007 Aww shux... That means a lot to me. hahaha Gosh darn it, we like you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 I like this group: LT, Jackson, Gore, LJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDFFFreak Posted August 6, 2007 Author Share Posted August 6, 2007 I like this group: LT, Jackson, Gore, LJ Very thoughtful post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 (edited) Hey this thread is IMO. Rudi really isn't a 1st rounder in a PPR. you are if you think rudi isnt a 1st rounder in PPR leagues.... i agree...in Fusion(PPR) Rudi has ranked the following among RBs: 2003: 22 2004: 9 2005: 8 2006:10 EDIT: and I think 5 is the best GROUP Edited August 6, 2007 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Ryan Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 (edited) I like them in the order they are ranked. 1 thru 5. Alexander is the best back of the bunch, if he is 100%, and Im completely sold on Benson. Group 5 doesnt even have 3 starters. Barber wont be a starter, anyone thinking that is mistaken. Edited August 6, 2007 by Sgt. Ryan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Trick Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 At first I was thinking 5 for sure, but 3 looks pretty good as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Beatings Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Ya know... come to think of it, I believe this may be a well disguised rate my team thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joethin Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 I guess I am the only one that likes #4. Make that 2 of us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanCT Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 I think it's #1 and not even close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDFFFreak Posted August 6, 2007 Author Share Posted August 6, 2007 Ya know... come to think of it, I believe this may be a well disguised rate my team thread. It took until towards the end of the second page for someone to say this. I thought it was going to be sooner. If it was a full on rate my team, I would have listed the WRs too. I was just curious... honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 I like this group: LT, Jackson, Gore, LJ That's why you're PeeWee. you are if you think rudi isnt a 1st rounder in PPR leagues.... i agree...in Fusion(PPR) Rudi has ranked the following among RBs: 2003: 22 2004: 9 2005: 8 2006:10 EDIT: and I think 5 is the best GROUP That's because Perry was too fragile to be a good back up, added to the fact that he isn't that good. Irons also had some injury problems but I feel he is much better than Perry and will be given a much bigger role brcause of it. He was run of the mill at best last year and if Irons can get the fumbles fixed and continue showing his speed Rudi could lose that consistency this year on less touches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spartans91 Posted August 6, 2007 Share Posted August 6, 2007 (edited) My gut reaction was to say #2, but I think #5 has the biggest upside. I believe in Ronnie Brown this year and Marion Barber is a big TD and receiving threat. Edited August 6, 2007 by Spartans91 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 (edited) 4 and 2 Edited August 7, 2007 by Avernus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiese Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 3. reply to mine.. might be on 2nd page by now though. thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 That's why you're PeeWee.That's because Perry was too fragile to be a good back up, added to the fact that he isn't that good. Irons also had some injury problems but I feel he is much better than Perry and will be given a much bigger role brcause of it. He was run of the mill at best last year and if Irons can get the fumbles fixed and continue showing his speed Rudi could lose that consistency this year on less touches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gilthorp Posted August 7, 2007 Share Posted August 7, 2007 Sarge's post makes no sense to me....but often times his posts never do. I can't see 5 being #5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.