SLAYER Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 for the rest of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuke'em ttg Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 for the rest of the season. injury? or playin like russell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpholmes Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 McFadden is a #3 RB in PPR (lower in non-PPR) with upside. Do not draft him as your #2 RB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
efranklin Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 for the rest of the season. Same here. What a bunch of garbage, he is worse than LJ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Same here. What a bunch of garbage, he is worse than LJ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LayLow Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 yup. McFadden, Bench, Bench, Mcfadden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Anyone else notice that he's got Heyward-Bey's projections? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awahl63 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Yuck. I knew I should have started Mewelde over him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 KPHolmes, would you be happy with McFadden's numbers as a #3 RB? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpholmes Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 KPHolmes, would you be happy with McFadden's numbers as a #3 RB? Just making a point. Some people were touting his RB1 ability this preseason... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLAYER Posted October 4, 2009 Author Share Posted October 4, 2009 Just making a point. Some people were touting his RB1 ability this preseason... but KC 3 rushes 0 yds. putrid as is the whole Oak offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJV Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Yuck. I knew I should have started Mewelde over him +1 was giving DMC 1 more chance so guess what BENCHED!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awahl63 Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 +1 was giving DMC 1 more chance so guess what BENCHED!!!!!! Same. Update: He just got another rush for a loss of 3 yards. 4 rushes for -8 yards. Stud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shotgun Messiahs Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 (edited) I think he is running backwards today. Edited October 4, 2009 by Shotgun Messiahs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJV Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 HOLY CHRIST he has 1 point!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Same here. What a bunch of garbage, he is worse than LJ. LJ isn't that bad. Might end up with 1000 yds on a horrid, horrid team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Muto Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Man if you can't run on Houston who can you run on ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke davenport Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Freakin' disgraceful. Just disgraceful. What a black hole all things Raiders have become. This guy was my RB 2 then RB 3, now is bench material, a step away from WW. Russell at QB, injured and not ready for primetime WRs, and now a non-existent running game. Start wearing the bags Raider nation , and I say that with sadness. It's a long way from the glory days. The NFL was more interesting when the men in black mattered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 (edited) Oaklands leading runner 24 yards, their leading receiver 34 yards. Can the league force Al Davis to sell the team? HOLY CHRIST he has 1 point!!!! Michael Bush has minus 2.10 in one of my leagues. Edited October 4, 2009 by Randall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 When some one posts that they just picked up McFadddin off the WW it won't be a joke. I benched Buckhalter for him and I am sure if Buckhalter gets one point, I will regret it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Beatings Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Looking Good Raider Nation! Rushing ATT YDS TD LG J. Fargas 10 24 0 13 D. Heyward-Bey 1 20 0 20 M. Bush 3 10 0 5 J. Russell 1 1 0 1 D. McFadden 6 -3 0 4 L. Murphy 1 -7 0 -7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ts Posted October 4, 2009 Share Posted October 4, 2009 Look at it this way ... DMC is probably not the worst draft choice at a "talent position" made in the NFL in recent years ... Heyward-Bey & certainly J. Russell come quickly to mind as likely being worse long-term selections, despite what DMC did (or did not) produce today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 Look at it this way ... DMC is probably not the worst draft choice at a "talent position" made in the NFL in recent years ... Heyward-Bey & certainly J. Russell come quickly to mind as likely being worse long-term selections, despite what DMC did (or did not) produce today. Russell, McFadden, and Heyward Bey. So your calling it not the next Troy, Emmitt, and Michael then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 Russell, McFadden, and Heyward Bey. So your calling it not the next Troy, Emmitt, and Michael then? If you go to 2009 they have the same productivity as Troy, Emmitt, and Michael. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengal Mania Posted October 5, 2009 Share Posted October 5, 2009 obviously, the bench was not accross the line of scrimmage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.