Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Breaking News


CaP'N GRuNGe
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=321458876

 

ARDC Individual Attorney Record of Public Registration and Public Disciplinary and Disability Information as of November 17, 2009 at 12:24:44 PM:

 

Full Licensed Name: Michelle Obama

Full Former name(s): Michelle Lavaughn Robinson

Date of Admission as Lawyer

by Illinois Supreme Court: May 12, 1989

Registered Business Address: Not available online

Registered Business Phone: Not available online

Illinois Registration Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law

Malpractice Insurance:

(Current as of date of registration;

consult attorney for further information) No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status.

Public Record of Discipline

and Pending Proceedings: None

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Have to agree here! she decided she didn't want to practice law anymore and deactivated her license, moving on to another career.

 

 

Did you look at your own link? The results of which you posted above? Did you overlook this:

 

"No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status. "

 

I do not think "court ordered" means she voluntarily did anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Did you look at your own link? The results of which you posted above? Did you overlook this:

 

"No malpractice report required as attorney is on court ordered inactive status. "

 

I do not think "court ordered" means she voluntarily did anything.

 

You really just posted something with the word "voluntarily" bolded... and then said "I don't see anything that indicates it was voluntary?

 

I can't argue against that. Nobody can. Thanks again for posting. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats all our guys mean to this guy.......disgusting

 

Obama arrived on the base 3:19 p.m. local time (1 a.m. Eastern Standard Time), and received a rousing welcome from 1,500 troops in camouflage uniforms, many holding cameras or pointing cell phones to snap pictures.

 

"You guys make a pretty good photo op," the president said.

 

:wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats all our guys mean to this guy.......disgusting

 

 

 

:wacko:

 

Did Obama say he was sorry for being late visiting the troops because he was too busy bowing down to Communist leaders that controlled most of our money and he'll one day make a decision regarding their future once the poll numbers come in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Obama say he was sorry for being late visiting the troops because he was too busy bowing down to Communist leaders that controlled most of our money and he'll one day make a decision regarding their future once the poll numbers come in?

 

 

we will all be bowing to our chinese leaders soon enough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAIL Obama, how dare anyone criticize the Messiah!!! Without Obama we would be failing as a country. I praise the man for apologizing to the rest of the world for all of our wrong doings. Its about time we get some socialism in this country. I hope with all my might that the whole country can be as well off as the South Side of Chicago. Thanks Obama I love you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it sure seems stupid to me to post silliness about him bowing a little too low to a chinese dude, or making a joke about a photo op with the troops. ya know, many on the left were completely unhinged when they were obsessed with bush's "plastic turkey" and crap like fake memos about him being AWOL 30 years ago. it was stupid then, and it is stupid now. but it is ESPECIALLY stupid when they are in the midst of totally remaking the laws of the country in such a misguided, shallow partisan manner, and in a way that will take decades to undo. I mean, can we PLEASE focus on that sort of thing, rather than moronic speculation about why we've never seen his high school report card?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it sure seems stupid to me to post silliness about him bowing a little too low to a chinese dude, or making a joke about a photo op with the troops. ya know, many on the left were completely unhinged when they were obsessed with bush's "plastic turkey" and crap like fake memos about him being AWOL 30 years ago. it was stupid then, and it is stupid now. but it is ESPECIALLY stupid when they are in the midst of totally remaking the laws of the country in such a misguided, shallow partisan manner, and in a way that will take decades to undo. I mean, can we PLEASE focus on that sort of thing, rather than moronic speculation about why we've never seen his high school report card?

 

Agreed. Don't sweat the small stuff, it's the big stuff we need to be focused on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it sure seems stupid to me to post silliness about him bowing a little too low to a chinese dude, or making a joke about a photo op with the troops. ya know, many on the left were completely unhinged when they were obsessed with bush's "plastic turkey" and crap like fake memos about him being AWOL 30 years ago. it was stupid then, and it is stupid now. but it is ESPECIALLY stupid when they are in the midst of totally remaking the laws of the country in such a misguided, shallow partisan manner, and in a way that will take decades to undo. I mean, can we PLEASE focus on that sort of thing, rather than moronic speculation about why we've never seen his high school report card?

 

Usually I completely agree with you. It's not just that we have not seen his "high school report card,." as you flippantly said. We have seen no record of anything to document his entire life. This is quite different than everything we knew about Bush - we really know nothing about Obama. Questioning that is not moronic.

 

I do not believe he is a Constitutional President and therefore the heinous remaking of laws by his administration is likely unlawful. I do not expect any court to realize that - which is really scary.

 

Having said that, just what would you have those of us that are against his brand of change do?

 

I for one, have been totally focused on doing everything I can to prevent his polices from being enacted. My representatives , Boxer, Feinstein and Matsui, are lockstepping Progressive Socialists that do not respond to any voter input.

Edited by Lady.hawke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, can we PLEASE focus on that sort of thing, rather than moronic speculation about why we've never seen his high school report card?

 

This is your base

 

 

Usually I completely agree with you. It's not just that we have not seen his "high school report card,." as you flippantly said. We have seen no record of anything to document his entire life. This is quite different than everything we knew about Bush - we really know nothing about Obama. Questioning that is not moronic.

 

I do not believe he is a Constitutional President and therefore the heinous remaking of laws by his administration is likely unlawful. I do not expect any court to realize that - which is really scary.

 

Having said that, just what would you have those of us that are against his brand of change do?

 

I for one, have been totally focused on doing everything I can to prevent his polices from being enacted. My representatives , Boxer, Feinstein and Matsui, are lockstepping Progressive Socialists that do not respond to any voter input.

 

Embrace it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAIL Obama, how dare anyone criticize the Messiah!!! Without Obama we would be failing as a country. I praise the man for apologizing to the rest of the world for all of our wrong doings. Its about time we get some socialism in this country. I hope with all my might that the whole country can be as well off as the South Side of Chicago. Thanks Obama I love you.

 

 

Usually I completely agree with you. It's not just that we have not seen his "high school report card,." as you flippantly said. We have seen no record of anything to document his entire life. This is quite different than everything we knew about Bush - we really know nothing about Obama. Questioning that is not moronic.

 

I do not believe he is a Constitutional President and therefore the heinous remaking of laws by his administration is likely unlawful. I do not expect any court to realize that - which is really scary.

 

Having said that, just what would you have those of us that are against his brand of change do?

 

I for one, have been totally focused on doing everything I can to prevent his polices from being enacted. My representatives , Boxer, Feinstein and Matsui, are lockstepping Progressive Socialists that do not respond to any voter input.

 

 

 

I need to take a class in Teabaggingese because none of this stuff makes any sense. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having said that, just what would you have those of us that are against his brand of change do?

 

Vote better next time.

 

In the meanwhile suck it up, just as we had to do with eight horrible years of W.

 

Trying to make up stories about how he didn't eat paste in Hawaii, so he isn't a citizen is in the least, sad and at the most psychotic.

 

We had our moment, when W stole Florida, but NO ONE speculated about secession or civil war or any of that sh!t. Sure we complained, but at least we recognized the process, flawed as it was, gave us a President we were stuck with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to make up stories about how he didn't eat paste in Hawaii, so he isn't a citizen is in the least, sad and at the most psychotic.

 

I never did that. I simply pointed out many things we do not know about him - simple things that we know about almost all previous Presidents. Why all the secrecy and sealed records? It should concern everyone. How about you do some research and fill in some of the blanks?

 

Regarding his citizenship, I said on an earlier thread that I would stipulate that he is a citizen (Although his stubborn refusal to produce a long form birth certificate makes me wonder, it does not matter to my point) but is still ineligible to be President of the United States, POTUS. Before I could respond to a sincere question, the thread was locked, as they all quickly seem to be nowadays.

 

I do not have the time to hang out here and readily respond to comments, some capitalists actually have to work.

 

That ends now. I am delighted to finally have the time to address the issue.

 

The "birther" designation has always been a media/campaign smoke screen, a way to deflect attention from the actual and serious issue.

 

The Constitution requires that the POTUS be a "natural born citizen." Senators are only required to simply be "citizens." Clearly the founders demanded a hgher standard for the POTUS. So, what is that standard?

 

The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has ruled that anyone born on U.S. soil is a "citizen," but have declined to declare them of "natural born" status. They have never had to rule about that in terms of the POTUS. Many times, when new issues have come before them, the SCOTUS had to refer the the writings of the Founders. Clearly, the Founders considered the purity (in terms of citizenship) of the POTUS to be a national security issue. They wanted him to be "of blood" and "of soil," and therefore have no allegiance to any other country. They were so strong in that opinion, and realizing that none of them could meet that standard, they grandfathered themselves in as eligible, per The Constitution. Except for the Founders, that meant the POTUS must be born on U.S. soil of two citizen parents. That is the higher standard.

 

Obama admits his father was British (before Kenya gained independence) and therefore Obama also had British citizenship at his birth. He is ineligible to be the POTUS. McCain was also ineligible on this issue, having been born in a Panamanian hospital and not on a military base, which is likely why the GOP did not bring up this issue, not to mention their new darling, Bobby Jindal is also ineligible.

 

You might ask about who is responsible for putting Constitutionally eligible candidates on ballots - I know I did when I first became aware of this issue. It's the various Secretaries of States. Several states allowed Roger Calero, the Socialist Party candidate, to be on their ballot. He was born in Nicaragua, of two Nicaraguan citizens. By any standard, he was not eligible to be the POTUS.

 

Lastly, before you start arguing about the unfairness of whom The Constitution prohibits being the POTUS, you might consider potentially who the natural born requirement prevents from being the POTUS. If Obama is eligible, so would be the spawn of Osama bin Laden born of an American woman in New York City. I believe the Constitution should and does prevent that from happening and there should be no exceptions. Even for the charismatic teleprompter reader now occupying the White House.

 

Should you care to actually educate yourself on this issue - I have barely touched on the research - this site is intensive and will take hours to absorb:

 

Natural Born Citizen

Edited by Lady.hawke
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information