Jumpin Johnies Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Peyton Manning sucks. 671502[/snapback] Why would anyone make such a statement? You're a real jerk Random Guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Why would anyone make such a statement? You're a real jerk Random Guy. 671554[/snapback] He must be Tedy Bruschi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 So is Random Guy a WaterMan alias? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 So is Random Guy a WaterMan alias? 671631[/snapback] More like a skins alias. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolv Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Well, to be fair, Vick got his team further than all but 2 others. 668561[/snapback] Atlanta also played only TWO teams all season with a winning record......You stick Vick and Co. in a competitive conference and see how many wins they gets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 If Atlanta was in the AFC they would not have made the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Atlanta also played only TWO teams all season with a winning record......You stick Vick and Co. in a competitive conference and see how many wins they gets. 671708[/snapback] Can someone tell me why Atlanta had an easy schedule this season? Anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 If Atlanta was in the AFC they would not have made the playoffs. 671737[/snapback] They beat San Diego who had the same record as the Colts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Can someone tell me why Atlanta had an easy schedule this season? Anyone? 671792[/snapback] Because the NFC was actually competitive last year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Because the NFC was actually competitive last year? 671798[/snapback] Competitive as in playing against Doug Johnson and not Vick? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolv Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 They beat San Diego who had the same record as the Colts. 671796[/snapback] They also lost to KC and TB with a combined score of 83 - 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 (edited) Competitive as in playing against Doug Johnson and not Vick? 671821[/snapback] 2003: Johnson and Kittner (11 games) - 10 passing TDs (0.91 TDs/game), 2046 passing yds (186 yds/game) 2004: Vick (15 games) - 14 passing TDs (0.93 TDs/game), 2313 passing yds (154 yds/game) Edited January 25, 2005 by Bill Swerski Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 They also lost to KC and TB with a combined score of 83 - 10 671840[/snapback] The Patriots lost to Miami, but they are going to the Superbowl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 2002: Johnson and Kittner (11 games) - 10 passing TDs (0.91 TDs/game), 2046 passing yds (186 yds/game) 2003: Vick - 14 passing TDs (0.88 TDs/game), 2313 passing yds (145 yds/game) 671857[/snapback] And that little thing with 900 yards rushing and 3 TDs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 And that little thing with 900 yards rushing and 3 TDs. 671859[/snapback] Looks like he's playing the wrong position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolv Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 The Patriots lost to Miami, but they are going to the Superbowl. 671858[/snapback] I thought we were comparing Atlanta's schedule? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 So is Random Guy a WaterMan alias? 671631[/snapback] Interesting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Vatican Hitsquad Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 And that little thing with 900 yards rushing and 3 TDs. 671859[/snapback] And a not-so-little thing like 17 turnovers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Looks like he's playing the wrong position. 671860[/snapback] Hopefully they get a quality WR during the off season and he can pick up the 900 yards and 3 TDs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Hopefully they get a quality WR during the off season and he can pick up the 900 yards and 3 TDs. 672055[/snapback] Funny how McNabb's had success with low-quality WRs like Thrash, Pinkston, and Mitchell over the years. I guess that Vick just isn't as good as McNabb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Little Bit Special Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Funny how McNabb's had success with low-quality WRs like Thrash, Pinkston, and Mitchell over the years. I guess that Vick just isn't as good as McNabb. 672159[/snapback] In "Mueller's Mailbag" on ESPN.com, Randy Mueller, former Saints GM, said that watching Vick on Sunday reminded him of McNabb three years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 You can give Vick all the "quality" WRs you want ... but until he settles down and decides to throw the ball (yeah right) it won't change a thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Score 1 Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 You guys who are already writing off Vick crack me up. If the Falcons were to cut Vick, I guarantee you that more than half the teams in the NFL, both AFC & NFC, would be jumping all over each other with pen & check book ready to sign him. I wonder why that is? Must be because he sucks huh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolv Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 You guys who are already writing off Vick crack me up. If the Falcons were to cut Vick, I guarantee you that more than half the teams in the NFL, both AFC & NFC, would be jumping all over each other with pen & check book ready to sign him. I wonder why that is? Must be because he sucks huh 672342[/snapback] Nobody is writing him off. It's hard to swallow the hype though.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Vatican Hitsquad Posted January 25, 2005 Share Posted January 25, 2005 Of course they would, Dallas signed Ryan Leaf after SD deep sixed him, and KC just signed Crouch so it just goes to show that some teams just don't learn a thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.