Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Beware, LJ owners!


Bronco Billy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Last season, Larry Johnson put up 416 rushes, the most in the history of the NFL in a season.

 

In the past 25 years, players have met or exceeded 370 rushes 25 times - including Johnson last year. The season after having that many carries the RB performed significantly worse almost every time. Only one of the RBs, Eric Dickerson in 1983, actually gained rushing yardage the following season, gaining 295 more yards in 1984 - but he had 4 less rushing TDs. Every time a RB hit or exceeded 370 carries, he had less TDs the following year. Only Dickerson in '83, Walter Payton in '84, and Tomlinson in '02 didn't have their rushing yardage totals drop at least 227 yds the following year. Only Dickerson in '84, John Riggins in '83, James Wilder in '85, & Ricky Williams in '03 didn't see their rushes drop by at least 50 carries.

 

The average drop for the 23 (Ricky Williams in '03 isn't counted since he didn't play in '04) events is: 3 less games played, 118 fewer carries, 652 fewer rushing yards, and 7 fewer rushing TDs.

 

Lest anyone think these numbers are skewed dramatically because players didn't play the next season, Williams is the only one who didn't play the following season. If you single out the following seasons where player played in at least 15 games, there are 12 events, (8) 16 game seasons and (4) 15 game seasons. Of those 12 seasons, rushes dropped an average of 55 rushes in the season, rushing yards dropped by an average of 312 yds, and rushing TDs dropped by an average of 6.

 

So, if history has shown us anything in the past 25 years, it's that if a RB is run into the ground in a year, the following year he'll have a dramatic drop in his production. There's a 33% chance he'll miss at least 1/4th of the season, and even if he plays all the games that his production will drop significantly.

 

You have been warned...

 

********************************************************

Raw data:

 

Player/year -- Rushes that year -- fewer games next year -- fewer rushes next year -- fewer rush yards next year -- fewer rush TDs next year

 

 

Player/year	Rushes	- gms	- rushes	- ru yds	- ru TDsS Alexander '05	370	6	118	984	20C Martin '04	371	4	151	962	7R Williams '03	392	4	152	1060	7J Lewis '03	387	0	-10	481	7R Williams '02	383	DNP			L Tomlinson '02	372	0	59	38	1E George '00	403	0	88	570	9E James '00	387	10	236	1047	10J Anderson '98	410	14	391	1787	14T Davis '98	392	12	325	1797	19J Bettis '97	375	0	59	480	4E Smith '95	377	1	50	569	13B Foster '92	390	7	213	979	3E Smith '92	373	2	90	227	9C Okoye '89	370	1	125	675	5E Dickerson '88	370	1	74	348	7E Dickerson '86	404	4	121	533	5G Riggs '85	397	0	54	392	1M Allen '85	380	3	172	1000	6J Wilder '84	407	0	42	244	3W Payton '84	381	0	56	133	2E Dickerson '84	379	2	87	871	2E Dickerson '83	390	0	11	-295	4J Riggins '83	375	1	48	108	10

 

 

** - a negative number indicates a gain over the previous year

Edited by Bronco Billy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is good info ...but let me ask which) in a standard scoring league would you take before

LJ ??

 

 

I remember seeing that question being asked last year about Alexander, with the question marks regarding the top 3 RBs drafted being focused on Johnson due to his upright running style & the losses on the O-line.

 

I also remember a few of us putting forth that Johnson would be just fine & that Alexander should have been the one with the question marks due to the loss of Hutchinson & his workload the previous year.

 

What you do with the information is up to you - but there were a lot more warning signs about Alexander last year than there were about Johnson, IMO.

 

This year the top 3 RBs drafted ought to be LT, LJ, & Jackson. Now the buyer beware label has shifted on to Johnson. If you have the #1 or #2 pick, red flags ought to be going up on Johnson & you ought to be considering LT & Jackson. If you have the #3 pick, you're hoping that Jackson is there for you, but if it's Johnson that's left, you're in quite a dilemma. Johnson figures to see his production drop significantly - it might be time to shop that pick & gain extra picks. That so many good RBs have had such a power outage after such a rigorous season isn't simply a statistical anomoly. Virtually no RBs return to that kind of production after seeing so much work the season before - and Johnson saw more work last year than any RB in NFL history.

Edited by Bronco Billy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember seeing that question being asked last year about Alexander, with the question marks regarding the top 3 RBs drafted being focused on Johnson due to his upright running style & the losses on the O-line.

 

I also remember a few of us putting forth that Johnson would be just fine & that Alexander should have been the one with the question marks due to the loss of Hutchinson & his workload the previous year.

 

What you do with the information is up to you - but there were a lot more warning signs about Alexander last year than there were about Johnson, IMO.

 

This year the top 3 RBs drafted ought to be LT, LJ, & Jackson. Now the buyer beware label has shifted on to Johnson. If you have the #1 or #2 pick, red flags ought to be going up on Johnson & you ought to be considering LT & Jackson. If you have the #3 pick, you're hoping that Jackson is there for you, but if it's Johnson that's left, you're in quite a dilemma. Johnson figures to see his production drop significantly - it might be time to shop that pick & gain extra picks. That so many good RBs have had such a power outage after such a rigorous season isn't simply a statistical anomoly. Virtually no RBs return to that kind of production after seeing so much work the season before - and Johnson saw more work last year than any RB in NFL history.

 

 

 

I agree with your top 3 ...I would have sjax behind tomlinson and then

LJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:D

 

You must be a smart man.

 

 

Well, duh. :tup:

 

However, just to further underscore your point, look at how many times a player has bounced back from 400 carries. None the following year. :D

 

I don't blame someone for taking a risk on LJ, but I'd damn well better have his backup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had LT 2 years in a row in our auction league but 3d is almost guaranteed not to happen as he'll be overpriced this year (as our owners often seem to think last year = this year). So will LJ and Jackson, probably.......so I like SA as a hopefully (and relatively) "cheap" option to bounce back for a nice year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LJ is more likely to score less next year because the Chiefs are gonna be terrible. I don't think the rushing attempt correlation in this case will matter.

 

Agreed that this will likely be the most significant factor. LJ's going to see 8 men in the box quite a bit this season.

 

While 400-carry seasons aren't good for any RB, I'd say that its impact on LJ would be less than many of the other backs listed in the first post. Guys like Terrell Davis and Eddie George not only had significantly more carries in their NFL careers than LJ at the time that they experienced their drop-offs in production, but they also had a ton of playoff carries IN ADDITION to their 350+ carry seasons. Terrell Davis had a whopping 951 total carries from the beginning of the '97 season through SB 33. Yikes! No wonder his knee gave out the following season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm picking LJ second. Actually, I'll pick Peyton ahead of him if it's a league that scores 6 points for a passing td. I want nothing to do with SJax. He is big Veronica in my book, regardless of last year. LJ is a beast. LJ has about 2,000 carries left in him.

 

 

Although the stats dispute I agree with this. Not sure what a veronica is but im not ready to make SJAX a stud yet. The fact that he doesnt split carries might get him there though..Hes talented but I have also seen the Rams misuse him and him dissapear a lot.

Edited by whomper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

While 400-carry seasons aren't good for any RB, I'd say that its impact on LJ would be less than many of the other backs listed in the first post. Guys like Terrell Davis and Eddie George not only had significantly more carries in their NFL careers than LJ at the time that they experienced their drop-offs in production, but they also had a ton of playoff carries IN ADDITION to their 350+ carry seasons. Terrell Davis had a whopping 951 total carries from the beginning of the '97 season through SB 33. Yikes! No wonder his knee gave out the following season.

 

Exactly what I was gonne point out :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else remember BB's RB stats/projections ??? I'll clue you in.....For 4 years, all the research he did was quite painful, it hurt anyone who took it !!!!

 

I am in a league with BB and he did trade LJ/Priest, so at least he is backing up the bullyshat he preaches this time around. BTW, Jay, tell the wife I said Hi.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else remember BB's RB stats/projections ??? I'll clue you in.....For 4 years, all the research he did was quite painful, it hurt anyone who took it !!!!

 

I am in a league with BB and he did trade LJ/Priest, so at least he is backing up the bullyshat he preaches this time around. BTW, Jay, tell the wife I said Hi.........

 

 

:D

 

& tell the wife whatever you want the next time you see her...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone else remember BB's RB stats/projections ??? I'll clue you in.....For 4 years, all the research he did was quite painful, it hurt anyone who took it !!!!

 

I am in a league with BB and he did trade LJ/Priest, so at least he is backing up the bullyshat he preaches this time around. BTW, Jay, tell the wife I said Hi.........

 

shut up sasquatch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the denial.

 

"Hell, it happened 23 other times out of 23 times in the past 25 years, but it won't happen this time with Larry Johnson, despite some of the incredible studs on the list above."

 

Okay, so if you are walking down the street 23 days in a row & the old lady next door comes out & kicks you in the nuts every single one of those days - don't you start wearing a cup on day 24?

Edited by Bronco Billy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the denial.

 

"Hell, it happened 23 other times out of 23 times in the past 25 years, but it won't happen this time with Larry Johnson, despite some of the incredible studs on the list above."

 

Okay, so if you are walking down the street 23 days in a row & the old lady next door comes out & kicks you in the nuts every single one of those days - don't you start wearing a cup on day 24?

 

No, since I'm not stupid enough or weak enough to allow it to get that far in the first place.

 

Was it the baseball uni that got her attention BB?

 

:D

 

Edit: really my take on this is "who cares" - OK so he won't go 2000+/20+....he might "only" go 1600-1700 and TDs somewhere in the teens. I think I could live with it as I really doubt he'll just crash n burn outright.

Edited by BeeR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information