RHINOchaser Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 i took Boldin over Fitz, in the 2nd rd as my #1 wr, SHOULD i have taken FITZ the huddle had Boldin over fitz............. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooGie Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I took Fitz in all my leagues over Boldin. Call it a hunch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Time will tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bree22 Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I had Boldin last year and I would've love tohave him this year. I would've taken Boldin over Fitz also. Boldin is faster and does more with the ball after the catch. They should be even but Boldin can score from anywhere on the feild where fitzs is better closer to the goal line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Chancellor Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Pretty sure Boldin and Fitzy had roughly the same numbers last year - but Boldin played in two or three less games. If he stays healthy, I think he ('Quan) produces more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 1 game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Time will tell. 1 game. Yeah. Maybe I wasn't paying much attention at this point last season, but what is with all the impatient whining going on here? IT'S BEEN ONE WEEK PEOPLE!!!! Carolina's D sucks, Fitz is better than Boldin, Alexander is never going to score... blah blah blah Give me a break. I would actually rather read Men-U-Do's poetic wax than this garbage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loyalboyd Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 1 game. +1 and the only reason i would take Fitz is age in a dynasty league other than that both are great players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonorator Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Carolina's D sucks, Fitz is better than Boldin, Alexander is never going to score... darin - i think it's a little early to be making these kinds of statements. but it would have been nice for alexander to get at least one score against the lowly lions ... and what about that carolina d ... can they or can't they stop the run? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Boldin is one of the slowest receivers in the league. He ran a 4.7 40-yard-dash when entering the NFL. Fast for a lineman, very, very slow for a receiver. Yeah but he's a beast to tackle. Defenders get hurt trying to bring the guy down. I think he's faster than 4.7 too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PythonPatrol Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 (edited) Yeah but he's a beast to tackle. Defenders get hurt trying to bring the guy down. I think he's faster than 4.7 too. I have Boldin and I think he will again be awesome! But here is the info on Boldin from Wikipedia: "Anquan Boldin also was highly regarded leading up to the 2003 NFL Draft until he ran a 4.7 second 40 yard dash. He was picked 54th overall, after 5 other wide receivers were taken[5]. Boldin went on to break most rookie records for a wide receiver and be named Offensive Rookie of the Year and a Pro Bowl player as a rookie." Edited September 12, 2006 by PythonPatrol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I don't think that you can go wrong either way, assuming that you're in a performance league. It's like the difference between Harrison and Wayne... or Holt and Bruce five years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skrappy1 Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I'd be happy to have either, but I'd prefer Fitz slightly because he doesn't have knee issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 Fitz had 13 pts in standard perf, Boldin had 12. I'd be surprised if they aren't within a stone's throw of each other at the end of the year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I'd be happy to have either, but I'd prefer Fitz slightly because he doesn't have knee issues. No but even missing 2 games he and Fitz were almost even. Boldin had 20 more total plays than Fitz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted September 12, 2006 Share Posted September 12, 2006 I had Boldin last year and I would've love tohave him this year. I would've taken Boldin over Fitz also. Boldin is faster and does more with the ball after the catch. They should be even but Boldin can score from anywhere on the feild where fitzs is better closer to the goal line. Yeah and Boldin put up those stats in 14 games... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steelhead Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 Yeah and Boldin put up those stats in 14 games... yup, he's a stud. If he stays healthy the whole season I'd say his numbers will be a bit better than Fitzy. He does more after the catch in the open field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooGie Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 Fitz had 13 pts in standard perf, Boldin had 12. I'd be surprised if they aren't within a stone's throw of each other at the end of the year. 100% agree here. I only chose Fitz because it seems like Boldin would get the best corner back on the opposing DEF, not because I thought Fitz would get 50 more catches. Also, i factored in age regarding possible injury, but we all know age really has nothing to do with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REZ Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 I'd take Fitz over him just because of Boldin's past injury history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponce Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 One game into the season, they both will have good years. But I took Fitz in a couple leagues. The one game does not change my opinion, even if the numbers were in reverse. Fitz just runs such perfect routes, and has some of the best hands I have seen. Boldin seems faster, and stronger - they compliment each other very well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooGie Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 LITTLE SIDE DEBATE HERE: How good would they be if they were on seperate teams without a strong #2 to compliment them? I'm not sure either would put up Steve Smith numbers like last year (without the complimentary #2 that is) but for some reason I'd rather have Fitz. Regardless of what team he went to..any thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 YES, BIG MISTAKE... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjpro11 Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 LITTLE SIDE DEBATE HERE: How good would they be if they were on seperate teams without a strong #2 to compliment them? I'm not sure either would put up Steve Smith numbers like last year (without the complimentary #2 that is) but for some reason I'd rather have Fitz. Regardless of what team he went to..any thoughts? we've already seen what boldin can do without fitz.. the stats speak for themselves. Year Team G GS Rec Yds Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+ 1st 2003 Arizona Cardinals 16 16 101 1377 13.6 71 8 20 6 62 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 i took Boldin over Fitz, in the 2nd rd as my #1 wr, SHOULD i have taken FITZ the huddle had Boldin over fitz............. I wouldn't even bother turning in a lineup for the rest of the season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted September 13, 2006 Share Posted September 13, 2006 I'd take Fitz over him just because of Boldin's past injury history. Plus Larry is/was Denny's "ball boy". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.