Azazello1313 Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 He's the most exciting player in the game. not only that, he is a playmaker. he makes plays. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PantherDave Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 Jake Delhomme is overrated, he wouldn't have ran it in. No argument here-the only slight gleam of hope would have been that it was 4th down and not 3rd. He was over-rated in 06, no question about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furd Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 not only that, he is a playmaker. he makes plays. big time players make big time plays in big time games or something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PantherDave Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 Nahhh...only needing half a yard for the 1st down, Vick would've passed it to himself, same as he did in the Pitt game earlier this year. No,no, I'm quite confident that the self pass would have also been incomplete or intercepted and taken to the house for 6. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kraftykraft Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Say what you want about Vick, but if he would have been the one to bobble that FG snap he would have scored. Heard this was Romo's 2nd time to come up short at the goal line in their last two games. Huh? Well, I bet if Ladainian Tomlinson had taken that bobbled snap he would have scored from 20 yards out. And if Jerry Rice had been the holder he would never have bobbled the snap in the first place! And if George Blanda had been kicking he would have picked up the snap and thrown it for a TD!! Anyone want to bet that if Hitler had won WW2 there wouldn't have been a Cowboys/Seahawks game at all last weekend? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockerbraves Posted January 11, 2007 Author Share Posted January 11, 2007 Aarron Brooks wouldn't have even bothered to pick up the football. He woulda just smiled... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Aarron Brooks wouldn't have even bothered to pick up the football. He woulda just smiled... No, you're thinking of Rodney Peete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CD6405 Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 No, you're thinking of Rodney Peete No, he's thinking of Jerry Porter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 No, he's thinking of Jerry Porter. Maybe Joey Porter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SNOWBOUND33 Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 This thread isn't dead yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 One thing is for sure, no matter who was a QB on that play if they had thrown it into the endzone Troy Williamson would have dropped it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vet Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Vick would have scored with your mom. And now she'd be taking pennicillin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 Aarron Brooks wouldn't have even bothered to pick up the football. He woulda lost control of all bodily functions... Corrected... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CD6405 Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 QUOTE(Rockerbraves @ 1/10/07 8:49pm) Aarron Brooks wouldn't have even bothered to pick up the football. He woulda lost control of all bodily functions... Corrected... You mean Donovan McNabb, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 You mean Donovan McNabb, right? That would certainly wok...but when I saw Aaron Brooks, I thought of this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xMRogers Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 If Aaron Brooks would have dropped it, he'd have picked it up and thrown it 20 yards backwards... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco Billy Posted January 11, 2007 Share Posted January 11, 2007 If Aaron Brooks would have dropped it, he'd have picked it up and thrown it 20 yards backwards... Why would a DB be running 20 yards down the field behind the play on something like that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rockerbraves Posted January 13, 2007 Author Share Posted January 13, 2007 Just wanted a few more opinions on whether or not Vick would have scored vs. Seattle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CD6405 Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 Vick would have scored, while Romo is only partially black, Vick is fully black. This EASILY shows how he would have scored. Romo fumbled it at the 7, took it to the 2, that is 5 yards and he is HALF Black. VICK is completely black, so 5x2 equals 10, and I don't know about you guys but there was only 1 yard more. I think that logically points out why Vick would have got not only the 1st, but the TD and extra yards to spare. Case Closed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PantherDave Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 Vick would have scored, while Romo is only partially black, Vick is fully black. This EASILY shows how he would have scored. Romo fumbled it at the 7, took it to the 2, that is 5 yards and he is HALF Black. VICK is completely black, so 5x2 equals 10, and I don't know about you guys but there was only 1 yard more. I think that logically points out why Vick would have got not only the 1st, but the TD and extra yards to spare. Case Closed. You are a complete set of "tools". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 Just wanted a few more opinions on whether or not Vick would have scored vs. Seattle. you sir, are retarded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackass Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 i just came across this thread. I don't have time to read it all, but I think Vick would have scored. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bonedaddies Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 So we all agree Vick would have scored. That's what I thought. Just wasn't sure if those Vick haters would agree. The REAL question is why did the refs not review the spot or measure for the first down???? All he had to do was get inside the 1 and they have 4 new downs, it sure the heck looked like he was close to the endzone!! Not one expert or announcer even made mention of this fact anywhere, I was a little liqoured up by that point in the game, so correct me if I am crazy, but someone should have made them review it before Seattle snapped the ball!!! Dallas had nothing to lose!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furd Posted January 13, 2007 Share Posted January 13, 2007 This is likely the most retarded thread in the history of the site. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.