otis29 Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Clearly you subscribe to the "if I don't like the answers, change the argument" philosophy. The question isn't whether the trade could be completed, it's whether it's vetoable. Or ludicrous. And the answer is NO on both counts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelman Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I personally think it's ludicrous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cnote187 Posted September 18, 2008 Author Share Posted September 18, 2008 Clearly you subscribe to the "if I don't like the answers, change the argument" philosophy. The question isn't whether the trade could be completed, it's whether it's vetoable. Or ludicrous. And the answer is NO on both counts. Thank you, but he refuses to see that, He is a definite Newb, this is his first year playing, and he clearly doesn't understand. I said what you said like 3 pages back, he doesn't get it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twiley Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Hi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I dont understand ...LT for Parker or Parker or LT ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Quite the opposite. If you're playing with a bunch of morans that know absolutely nothing about FF, there might be a reason to veto a trade so the league's integrity isn't compromised. If you're playing with reasonably intelligent adults who know football, trades should NEVER be vetoed unless there is collusion. Quite simple really. I can all but guarantee....everything this tool thinks he knows about fantasy football he learned playing in yahoo public leagues, where any four people "voting against" a trade can have it overturned. people like this moron think an "ultra-competitive league" is one where every trade gets voted down, because him and all the other little pricks in their moms' basements automatically vote against every trade that doesn't involve them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelman Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Hi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cnote187 Posted September 18, 2008 Author Share Posted September 18, 2008 I can all but guarantee....everything this tool thinks he knows about fantasy football he learned playing in yahoo public leagues, where any four people "voting against" a trade can have it overturned. people like this moron think an "ultra-competitive league" is one where every trade gets voted down, because him and all the other little pricks in their moms' basements automatically vote against every trade that doesn't involve them.My thoughts exactly, The only trades they probably make in his league are like wavier wire pickups Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelman Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Actually yes, very few trades happen in my league. Did you get denied yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cnote187 Posted September 18, 2008 Author Share Posted September 18, 2008 Actually yes, very few trades happen in my league. Did you get denied yet? To answer your question no not yet, but as everyone has told you, that isn't the point. the point is if this trade is accepted it would never be vetoed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Dick Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I agree with michaelman here. This trade should not be vetoed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cnote187 Posted September 18, 2008 Author Share Posted September 18, 2008 I agree with michaelman here. This trade should not be vetoed. Then you agree with me lol not him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
otis29 Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I agree with michaelman here. This trade should not be vetoed. I'm not sure that's his position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Dick Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Then you agree with me lol not him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickvick Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I would keep Fast Willie.The top RB's this season are not performing.He has a bad toe and you already have a great #1.LT does not even look close to the same player he was 2 years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Agent Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 I went to take a 10 hour dump and look what I missed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cnote187 Posted September 18, 2008 Author Share Posted September 18, 2008 I went to take a 10 hour dump and look what I missed. Best Post of the thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cnote187 Posted September 18, 2008 Author Share Posted September 18, 2008 I would keep Fast Willie.The top RB's this season are not performing.He has a bad toe and you already have a great #1.LT does not even look close to the same player he was 2 years ago. You are probably right, and you have successfully made me have second thoughts lol, Now I really don't know what to do Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Picking Adrian with your 4th pick is one thing. TRADING your overall 40th pick for overall 1st pick is ridic. After the season starts, draft position of a player is irrelevant, it's all about current performance and anticipated future performance. Last year Randy moss was usually a 4th round type player. Are you telling me it would not have been fair to trade him for a player drafted in the first round and maybe even a second round player as well such that each side was giving up players providing comparable stats simply because of where he was drafted. Your logic is flawed at best, completely idiotic at worst. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thews40 Posted September 18, 2008 Share Posted September 18, 2008 Question is should the trade be vetoed for being unreasonable? Is it totally rediculous to offer , that's what you said. and nobody and I mean nobody agrees with you. I told you that you sound silly, I think you have been playing fantasy FB for a year or soemthing I agree with you, but disagree with use of the word "silly" here. I believe "ignorant" would have been more descriptive of the argument (or lack thereof). I don't even need to see the bet.. AND ILL JUST SAY I ACCEPT. Cuz you ain't getting LT You make no sense whatsoever. Actually yes, very few trades happen in my league. Did you get denied yet? and yet you're still posting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperCharger Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 The guy getting LT is getting hosed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 I just traded LT for Mendenhall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 The guy getting LT is getting hosed. Hence your screen name? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperCharger Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 I just traded LT for Mendenhall And it wasn't veto'd? You must play 8 year old girls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperCharger Posted September 19, 2008 Share Posted September 19, 2008 Hence your screen name? But Willie is "Fast". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.