Big Country Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 Ever hear of oil seeps? Yes, but that usually only occurs after a large mexican lunch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H8tank Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 But with days rolling by and no claim of responsibility it becomes rather remote possibility. How do you know no one has? Here is the tinfoil hat... but perhaps someone called France and said, "You see that plane that fell outa the sky" Well meet these demands or we drop more" Or, the bomb call could have been a test to see how they responded, went smooth, so they blew one outa the sky where they knew no one could ever find it, sorta like a dry run. Now, you have the information, you know they can't tell what happened, they have virtually no way to find/stop/inhibit more of the same... think about this. How much of a nuke program does a country brag about until they have one? Once the End game weapon is in place, that is when you have true power. For all we know, every single A330 has a bomb by the fuel tank just waiting... sorta like a sleeper cell. OK, I need some more tinfoil. Oh, and michelle hates whitey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar Magnolia Posted June 6, 2009 Share Posted June 6, 2009 It makes for a great movie script--start writing and you could make millions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbpfan1231 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 So now we have H8Tard, dmarctard and a guy who thinks Vikes fans should kill themselves. Represent yo! I believe you are talking about me and show me one time where I said Viking fans should kill themeselves? I am 99.9% sure I never said that. I did mention at one time that if I was a Viking fan I would have probably killed myself. It was an attempt at humor and I meant nothing bad by it - I also apologized in a topic for saying that. Show me where I specifically said that Viking fans should kill themesleves. Until then shut your piehole. Looks like you enjoy reading things your own way and your little mind can not handle the possibility of things being any different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimC Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 The Vikings would've lived if they didn't push off on Pearson and instead played by the rules of the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 I believe you are talking about me and show me one time where I said Viking fans should kill themeselves? I am 99.9% sure I never said that. I did mention at one time that if I was a Viking fan I would have probably killed myself. It was an attempt at humor and I meant nothing bad by it - I also apologized in a topic for saying that. Show me where I specifically said that Viking fans should kill themesleves. Until then shut your piehole. Looks like you enjoy reading things your own way and your little mind can not handle the possibility of things being any different. http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=1423547 http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=2002318 http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=2183516 http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=2318499 http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=2348688 And to Blitz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbpfan1231 Posted June 7, 2009 Share Posted June 7, 2009 http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=1423547 http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=2002318 http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=2183516 http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=2318499 http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?s=&a...t&p=2348688 And to Blitz My bad - those do sound bad and I do apologize. I will definately stop my attempt at humor with that. Those were bad especially the last one - my menaing was that the frustrations of what the Vikings have put there fans through there would have been drastic outcomes. I apologize and did not mean to offend anyone - If it did offend you I truly apologize. Thanks Big John for pointing that out and I should be and am ashamed for saying those things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 My bad - those do sound bad and I do apologize. I will definately stop my attempt at humor with that. Those were bad especially the last one - my menaing was that the frustrations of what the Vikings have put there fans through there would have been drastic outcomes. I apologize and did not mean to offend anyone - If it did offend you I truly apologize. Thanks Big John for pointing that out and I should be and am ashamed for saying those things. Do I still have to shut my pie hole? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 Do I still have to shut my pie hole? Yes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 Yes Saw that one coming, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbpfan1231 Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 Do I still have to shut my pie hole? Nope. I do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 Pilots in crashes had failed multiple tests By Alan Levin, USA TODAY In nearly every serious regional airline accident during the past 10 years, at least one of the pilots had failed tests of his or her skills multiple times, according to an analysis of federal accident records. In eight of the nine accidents during that time, which killed 137 people, pilots had a history of failing two or more "check rides," tests by federal or airline inspectors of pilots' ability to fly and respond to emergencies. In the lone case in which pilots didn't have multiple failures since becoming licensed, the co-pilot was fired after the non-fatal crash for falsifying his job application. Pilots on major airlines and large cargo haulers had failed the tests more than once in only one of the 10 serious accidents in this country over the past 10 years, according to a USA TODAY review of National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) accident reports. At a time when fatal aviation accidents have become increasingly rare, regional carriers have had four since 2004, compared with one by a major airline. Regional airlines fly roughly half of all airline flights, carrying about 20% of passengers. Pilot qualifications on regional carriers was at the center of an NTSB hearing last month into the February crash of a turboprop near Buffalo that killed 50 people. The pilot at the controls when the plane plunged had failed five checks, according to records revealed at the hearing. FIND MORE STORIES IN: National Transportation Safety Board | Pinnacle Airlines | Colgan Air Three of the accidents in which pilots had repeatedly failed tests involved a single airline conglomerate, Pinnacle Airlines. The crash near Buffalo was on Colgan Air, which is owned by Pinnacle. The captain on a Pinnacle jet that crashed in 2004 after accidentally killing both engines had failed seven checks. Pinnacle spokesman Joe Williams said the airline was not aware of all the test failures. "I'd say this is a symptom of a larger problem in selection and certification" of pilots, said Bill Voss, president of the independent Flight Safety Foundation. A shortage of pilots this decade, prompted in part by the lower numbers of former military pilots seeking airline jobs, prompted lower minimum qualifications, Voss said. Failing a single check during a career means little, but failing multiple times "really sends up the red flags," said Patrick Veillette, a corporate jet pilot who has written extensively on safety issues. Regional Airline Association President Roger Cohen defended the industry's safety practices. "All of our members are flying under the exact same standards as the mainline carriers," Cohen said. The NTSB has voiced concern about a loophole in a law requiring airlines to check pilots' records when hiring. The 1996 Pilot Records Improvement Act orders airlines to check pilot records from previous employers, but that does not cover failures that occurred while a pilot was in flight school. Airline pilots receive dozens of written and flying tests during a career. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTed46 Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 It's hard for a pilot to react to a giant shark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted June 8, 2009 Author Share Posted June 8, 2009 It's hard for a pilot to react to a giant shark http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1913775 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 Since when does a bomb threat equal actually bombed? Not often. If you're serious about shooting down a plane do you want to warn them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTed46 Posted June 8, 2009 Share Posted June 8, 2009 http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1913775 See Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Holy Roller Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 Do I still have to sell my pie hole? :divingboard: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiegie Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 ok, dmarc, here is Exhibit A for your case Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyBalata Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 ok, dmarc, here is Exhibit A for your case what....their last names were muhammed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 what....their last names were muhammed? First name Abdul? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted June 10, 2009 Author Share Posted June 10, 2009 ok, dmarc, here is Exhibit A for your case Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H8tank Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 Two passengers with names linked to Islamic terrorism were on the Air France flight which crashed with the loss of 228 lives, it has emerged. French secret servicemen established the connection while working through the list of those who boarded the doomed Airbus in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on May 31. Flight AF 447 crashed in the mid-Atlantic en route to Paris during a violent storm. While it is certain there were computer malfunctions, terrorism has not been ruled out. What a crazy idea... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 I am pretty sure that H8 has already been linked to domestic terrorists. Nothing to see here . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted June 11, 2009 Share Posted June 11, 2009 You're right as usual dmarctardchickenlittle: Meanwhile, two terror suspects who died alongside 226 other passengers on the stricken jet have been ruled out as a cause of the disaster. The two men only "shared the same name" as known Islamic radicals, posthumous security checks found. what....their last names were muhammed? First name Abdul? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiegie Posted June 13, 2009 Share Posted June 13, 2009 Most of the 16 bodies examined in preliminary stages of the probe into the flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris were found naked or with minimal clothing I think dmarc is on to something Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.