BeeR Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 I don't mean worst W/L or other stats, just who do you think generally is the worst, like if they played each other multiple times would come out on bottom? It's not like we don't have a lot of choices this year (so far anyway). Skins are really making a case despite 2 whole wins, and CLE deserves mention, but I'm sticking w/the Rams despite them trying to fool us with a near-victory over JAX. OAK messed w/my head after that win over PHI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaP'N GRuNGe Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Hard not to pick Cleveland. If it's Brown, flush it down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_bone65 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Skins or Bucs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussMan Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 The Lions, after of years of Matt Millen screwing up their draft, are woefully short on talent. When there are any injuries to starters they have practically zero depth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustOfBeenDrunk Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 very hard to tell ,, 6 or 7 teams come to mind but a few of them are sporting major injuries Browns Titans Chiefs Rams Skins Lions Tampa Out of the group i would have to say Lions or Tampa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpholmes Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 The Raiders win over the Eagles was not good play by the Raiders, it was bad play by the Eagles. They're still the worst in the league imo as long as Al Davis is at the helm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat2334 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 (edited) some bad ones out there for sure- but I think OAK, DET, KC, CLE, WASH have some decent personnel I think it has to be STL or TB Edited October 19, 2009 by wildcat2334 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peteteacher2001 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Hate to say it but the Rams have to be the worst. Years of terrible drafts, bad contract decisions (ie 60 mil to Bulger), and just a lack of common sense. The new front office and coach seem to be righting the ship though but, a 16 game losing streak never lies! Bad football team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 If the Rams didnt have Steven Jackson they could be the worst team ever from top to bottom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 Raiders winning surprisingly yesterday may save them from the honor of worst team for a few weeks before yesterday i had them as the worst probably Browns and Rams at this pt although both did put up decent fights yesterday I think Skins are the most underachieving to this pt especially given the easy schedule they have had to date Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpholmes Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 yeah, but out of all the bad teams, your's has one of the better defenses. OAK would be a completely different team with a decent QB and a slightly better OL. That's, what, 3-4 players away from being a playoff team? You can't say that about CLE. Granted, one of those players is the most important position, just sayin'. Asomugha has two years left on a MAJOR contract, and Morrison, Howard and Seymour are all in contract years. They can't afford all of them next season, so if they aren't winning this year (which they aren't) their current defense is irrelevant imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat2334 Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 If the Rams didnt have Steven Jackson they could be the worst team ever from top to bottom. tru dat BUT SJax is 1 more stud than TB has........... I think TB is neck and neck with STL with the worst personnel top to bottom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Vatican Hitsquad Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Asomugha has two years left on a MAJOR contract, and Morrison, Howard and Seymour are all in contract years. They can't afford all of them next season, so if they aren't winning this year (which they aren't) their current defense is irrelevant imo. I wish they could do a Neutron bomb type house cleaning, starting at the top and just re-boot the whole franchise fresh. A couple of rebuilding, fresh years from a new coach and eager ownership I could deal with. This purgatory of craptacular teams i can't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Honestly, Tenn is the worst team with the most talent. Talk about just shutting down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I'm surprised Washington isn't brought up more, played 6 teams without a win? Lose to the Lions, and have a decent defense. When Detroit plays the Rams, we'll probably find out who is the worst, but still have to keep Washington at the bottom as well having more talent than either of them. I really thought Cpep might help us, but so much for that , we need Stafford, CJ, and our defense to step up majorly to see any improvement or hope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL Fan Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Honestly, Tenn is the worst team with the most talent. Talk about just shutting down. I'm surpirsed it took this long for someone to mention them. Maybe not the worst team, but in the running for the most disappointing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furd Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I really thought Cpep might help us . . . Are you serious? Without Stafford and Johnson, its the Lions. With them back, its gotta be the Redskins right now. Pathetic showings against pathetic teams, losing most of those games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Hard to not vote for the browns here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I'm surpirsed it took this long for someone to mention them. Maybe not the worst team, but in the running for the most disappointing. That's why I mentioned worst with the most taltent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcat2334 Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Tenn is a hugh disappointment - but worst team?? not by a longhsot you all are seriously sleeping on how bad TB is - roster is awful Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmypg Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Bucs vs Rams would be an awful game. Raiders vs Browns is my 2nd choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Tenn is a hugh disappointment - but worst team?? not by a longhsot you all are seriously sleeping on how bad TB is - roster is awful My point being that you have a team that has SOOO much talent on a team as the Titans do, but would probably still lose to TB.... Now, that's bad! You can put listick on a turd, but regardless, it's still a turd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Bucs vs Rams would be an awful game. Raiders vs Browns is my 2nd choice. they could call it the Insomnia Bowl ...either game would cure it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted November 2, 2009 Author Share Posted November 2, 2009 TEN has taken themselves out of contention. Otherwise it's still a tough call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Muto Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 As a Browns fan...we are in the running for sure. Awful...very very awful team. How they didn't trade D-Anderson when they had a chance is beyond me. They could have got maybe a 1st round pick for the guy after 2007. I wanted Brady Quinn to start in 2008 and for them to trade Anderson. I guess it didn't matter in the end except for the wasted chance to pick up a draft pick. The Browns are a fantasy wasteland. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.