Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Dalvin Cook-OTB


Shaft
 Share

Recommended Posts

Apparently, the Vikings have received an offer for Dalvin Cook. I'm assuming it's serious since multiple news outlets are reporting it. I think he would be a great fit with the Bills. That would be two brothers in the same backfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My understanding is that Devin Singletary won't be brought back, so that frees up a spot. But the Bills really like James Cook and they've ranked #30 and #31 in RB carries for the last two years. That offense throws the ball more than runs. They had just 32% of their plays be an RB rushing attempt which was lower than all but TB. Plus Josh Allen takes up yards and scores as a runner. Dalvin wouldn't get as much work in that offense that has always been committee-ish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I'd be surprised if he's not a Viking," Pelissero said. "He's got $2 million that becomes fully guaranteed next week. He's coming off shoulder surgery so that money's locked in already. I would anticipate that he's absolutely on the team."

Cook’s cap hit currently sits at $14.1 million. If the Vikings cut or trade him before June 1, they’d save roughly $8 million against the cap. If they wait until after June 1, they’d save about $9 million. With the Vikings currently about $15 million over the cap, that's a big number to digest without ditching it or restructuring his deal. 

Edited by 6kings
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he's going anywhere.  Honestly, I don't think Mattison is anything but a part-time speller of Cook.  Mattison does not have the same wiggle.  Sure, Mattison had some good games in Cook's absence but I'd be shocked if he could do it for an entire season the way Cook does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, purplemonster said:

I'd let him go, I think it's downhill from here personally. He can still be effective periodically but I don't know if he has that dawg in him to do it every play, or if he has the ability to. Enjoyed him as a player though. 

I only watched a handful of Viking games last season but I thought Cook still had some juice left. Again, I didn't watch every game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, DMD said:

My understanding is that Devin Singletary won't be brought back, so that frees up a spot. But the Bills really like James Cook and they've ranked #30 and #31 in RB carries for the last two years. That offense throws the ball more than runs. They had just 32% of their plays be an RB rushing attempt which was lower than all but TB. Plus Josh Allen takes up yards and scores as a runner. Dalvin wouldn't get as much work in that offense that has always been committee-ish.

Yep, I don't get the talk of the Bills signing one of the top RBs, even older ones like Cook or Henry. Maybe they are looking to take some of that load off Allen, and a better back may allow it. Still seems like a passing focused team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, League_Champion said:

I only watched a handful of Viking games last season but I thought Cook still had some juice left. Again, I didn't watch every game. 

He still has some juice occasionally, and a true SB run would probably get him playing hard, so the Bills wouldn't be a bad fit that way. I just feel his best days are behind him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, DMD said:

My understanding is that Devin Singletary won't be brought back, so that frees up a spot. But the Bills really like James Cook and they've ranked #30 and #31 in RB carries for the last two years. That offense throws the ball more than runs. They had just 32% of their plays be an RB rushing attempt which was lower than all but TB. Plus Josh Allen takes up yards and scores as a runner. Dalvin wouldn't get as much work in that offense that has always been committee-ish.

 

1 hour ago, stevegrab said:

Yep, I don't get the talk of the Bills signing one of the top RBs, even older ones like Cook or Henry. Maybe they are looking to take some of that load off Allen, and a better back may allow it. Still seems like a passing focused team. 

These are valid points, but I think it's important to note that the Vikings ranked lower than the Bills in rushing attempts last year. I know this is slightly different than RB carries, but it shows that Cook than thrive in a passing first offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

There continues to be talk about Cook possibly being released (around draft time) as well as potential to be traded. Either way most expect that makes Alexander Mattison their lead back. A news write up on the Huddle indicates Mattison  would be a RB2 with RB1 upside. Do others here agree with that? Would that make him a top 20 RB pick? 

I have him on my squad and thinking he might have some keeper potential come August. I'll need 5 total and so far only have one good RB (Jacobs) some good WR (Adams, Cooper, Pittman, Jeudy, Gallup). And probably won't be keeping Murray after his bad injury which will impact him greatly this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His value obviously goes up if Cook goes away.  That said, any time in the past when Cook has missed a game, and experts have just penciled in Mattison to put up "Cook-like" numbers, he's underwhelmed/disappointed.  He's a great #2 in an offense that needs a 1-2 punch in the backfield.  As the primary guy, though, he's left something to be desired (in small sample sizes, obviously).  

I guess all I'm saying is that I would temper expectations.  Will he be a decent fantasy back if Cook isn't around any longer?  I would say sure, based purely on quantity of snaps/touches.  Is he going to break out and go crazy?  I just don't see that.  Mattison has always been most effective in a time-share role, and whether Cook is around or not, I think the Vikings know that he's best used in small to medium doses.  Give him his 12-18 touches per game, and mix in Nwangwu or Chandler (or someone else) to keep Mattison fresh. 

Where does that put him in rankings?  Well, most teams now do a time-share of backs, and the Vikings still have one of the top offenses in the league.  Put it this way.... I definitely wouldn't want him as my #1 back in leagues that require one, much less two.  As a RB2-3, though, I'd be satisfied, if not excited, to have him on my roster. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gopher said:

value obviously goes up if Cook goes away.  That said, any time in the past when Cook has missed a game, and experts have just penciled in Mattison to put up "Cook-like" numbers, he's underwhelmed/disappointed.  He's a great #2 in an offense that needs a 1-2 punch in the backfield.  As the primary guy, though, he's left something to be desired (in small sample sizes, obviously

Sounds like this is the time to sell high?

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cook leaves, the Vikings will pick up at least a rookie to compete for carries or one of the veterans that will be released. Mattison has utility and they gave him a 2-year deal for $7 million for this year and 2024. But nothing in the last four years says he capable of handing the same workload that Dalvin Cook had, let alone be as productive. I'm more concerned that MIN won't offer a RB with anywhere near the fantasy value that Cook did. The backfield is really undefined for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Anonymouse said:

Sounds like this is the time to sell high?

Depends on what you can get for him, and how bad you need the depth.  If you could use a serviceable RB2-3, I wouldn't trade him for peanuts. But, if you can get "starter" value or close, and can afford to let him go, then absolutely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Gopher said:

Depends on what you can get for him, and how bad you need the depth.  If you could use a serviceable RB2-3, I wouldn't trade him for peanuts. But, if you can get "starter" value or close, and can afford to let him go, then absolutely. 

You also need to play in a league where people have interest in trading in the off-season. Our league is very inactive in the off season. On my team I need RB so he isn't worth trading because you're not getting a better RB in return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Finn5033 said:

In the 6 games Mattison has started when Cook is out he has 693 scrimmage yards and 5 tds. Seems extremely solid to me. I think he will do quite well as a lead back.

Yes that sounds pretty good. Looking at the individual game starts he had just one bad game (under 5 points in most leagues). I don't think anybody is expecting him to put up numbers like Cook, but if he gets the start, and there isn't somebody vulturing the TD and receiving chances he should produce nicely. 

2020 wk6 vs ATL 10-26-0, 1-4   << that's a stinker

2020 wk17 @DET 21-95-1, 3-50-1   HUGE GAME

2021 wk3 vs SEA 26-112-0, 6-59   no TDs but still very good

2021 wk5 vs DET 25-113-0  7-40-1  similar to last game but add a TD

2021 wk 13 @DET 22-90-1  3-34  very solid yardage, a TD and some rec

2021 wk16 vs LAR 13-41-1 3-29-0  lower yardage but still had a TD, 3 rec and 70 combined yards

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thing to note about those game stats was that he faced DET three times - ranked only #29 vs. RB in 2021 and #32 vs RB in 2020. ATL was No. 8 that year and shut him down. SEA was only ranked No. 31 against RBs in 2021. LAR was No. 14 and held him to 3.2 YPC and he was at home.

He was pretty fortunate in facing DET and SEA with their very bad defenses at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DMD said:

Thing to note about those game stats was that he faced DET three times - ranked only #29 vs. RB in 2021 and #32 vs RB in 2020. ATL was No. 8 that year and shut him down. SEA was only ranked No. 31 against RBs in 2021. LAR was No. 14 and held him to 3.2 YPC and he was at home.

He was pretty fortunate in facing DET and SEA with their very bad defenses at the time.

Good point, I did notice that several games were against DET and wondered if that was a part of the success. I see another game vs DET in 2020 where Cook & Mattison combined for 275 yards rushing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the games that mattered, he was a non-factor.  Maybe garbage time/games evened out the stats, but I recall 2-3 games (at least one in prime-time) where he was shut down completely. 

I'm not saying he's not an effective back.  But I just view him as more of a complimentary type of player. I think that's when he's at his best.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information