Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Wow. Passing yards. NYJ, Bears and Browns. LOL


Dcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Dcat changed the title to Wow. Passing yards. NYJ, Bears and Browns. LOL

Sipe is the ONLY 4000 yard passer for the Browns. He is also #2 in season passing yards, Bernie Kosar and Baker Mayfield are 3/4 with 3800+

Even in the modern pass heavy era the Browns have been more of a running team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the 49ers generally being a run first team, i am happy with our qbs' passing yards since shanny has come to town... jimmy was at 3978 in 19.  their collective efforts were fine last year (right around 4k)

 

edit:

in 21: Jimmy/lance= 4600

20 was a debacle... i have never seen so many team injuries in my lifetime of watching football since the 70s. even so, jimmy/mullens/bethard were at 4300

Edited by Bier Meister
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jets... 🤣 

That streak ends this year. 

Beyond the guarantees (outside of injuries), I think the Jets (Rodgers), Browns (Watson), Panthers (Young), Steelers (Pickett), and an outside chance that the Ravens (Jackson) and Broncos (Wilson) also get 4,000 passing yards this year too. 

The Saints with Carr are on the guaranteed list for me. 

I also think Richardson is going to be huge for Fantasy teams this year.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/11/2023 at 4:27 AM, Gopher said:

Anybody notice that there are only two people on the list twice? 🤨

Nope missed that.

How many on the list now will show up a second time (diff team) next year, Irish would say Watson/Rodgers. I'll agree with Rodgers, but I still have my doubts about Watson, and how much the Browns will throw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, stevegrab said:

Nope missed that.

How many on the list now will show up a second time (diff team) next year, Irish would say Watson/Rodgers. I'll agree with Rodgers, but I still have my doubts about Watson, and how much the Browns will throw. 

Brady and Cousins.  It means nothing... I just like to mess with the Cousins haters out there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4K is also much more commonplace now, which makes the feats by Sipe and Namath that much more impressive, in my opinion.  Those two are much more impressive/surprising to me than the Bears.  If you haven't had a QB surpass "X" number of yards in the last decade or two, there's a good chance it's never happened at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gopher said:

4K is also much more commonplace now, which makes the feats by Sipe and Namath that much more impressive, in my opinion.  Those two are much more impressive/surprising to me than the Bears.  If you haven't had a QB surpass "X" number of yards in the last decade or two, there's a good chance it's never happened at all. 

Just for some perspective, when Sipe did it in 1980 Dan Fouts led the league with 4715, then Sipe at 4132. The next 5 average just under 3600. By # 25 you're getting Craig Morton (DEN) with 2150 (there were only 28 teams then). I suspect the numbers were even lower in 67 when Namath did it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, stevegrab said:

Just for some perspective, when Sipe did it in 1980 Dan Fouts led the league with 4715, then Sipe at 4132. The next 5 average just under 3600. By # 25 you're getting Craig Morton (DEN) with 2150 (there were only 28 teams then). I suspect the numbers were even lower in 67 when Namath did it. 

The 1967 AFL season had only 14 games.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2023 at 1:13 PM, Gopher said:

4K is also much more commonplace now, which makes the feats by Sipe and Namath that much more impressive, in my opinion.  Those two are much more impressive/surprising to me than the Bears.  If you haven't had a QB surpass "X" number of yards in the last decade or two, there's a good chance it's never happened at all. 

I saw Namath live for a few years.  Comparatively to 2022, the QB then had no protections.  None. It took near decapitation to get a roughing call.   And there was no such thing as can't bump receiver around after 5 yards.  DBs allowed to mug at will (comparatively to now). DPI was not a thing.  Namath just loved to fling it far down the field.  No fear of INTs. He had his share of them too. I can only imagine if he had the benefit of todays knee surgery improvements PLUS today's over-protection of QBs PLUS the constant modern DPIs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2023 at 4:26 PM, Big John said:

The 1967 AFL season had only 14 games.

Good point, and back then it was also not uncommon for most QBs to miss some games, only 4 started all 14 games, and not surprisingly they have the top 4 yardage numbers, and Namath the only one over 4000

Namath 4007, Hadl(SD) 3365, Lamonica(OAK) 3228, Dawson (KC) 2651, that's about 3300 average for the top 4. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information