spain Posted August 17, 2004 Author Share Posted August 17, 2004 Its got to be Chad Johnson or Hines Ward.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugarthium Posted August 17, 2004 Share Posted August 17, 2004 Its got to be Chad Johnson or Hines Ward.... 352813[/snapback] Why not Mason or Horn? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLAYER Posted August 17, 2004 Share Posted August 17, 2004 Its got to be Chad Johnson or Hines Ward.... 352813[/snapback] WARD JOHNSON RISKIER WITH PALMER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spain Posted August 18, 2004 Author Share Posted August 18, 2004 If WW selects Aaron Brooks again, I will leave the Huddle foreever... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Los Gigantes Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 If WW selects Aaron Brooks again, I will leave the Huddle foreever... 352862[/snapback] Stop tempting him! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugarthium Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 If WW selects Aaron Brooks again, I will leave the Huddle foreever... 352862[/snapback] I'll Drink to that! Any thoughts on the 3RBs selected by FFMastermind? I think it is a mistake. What if a RB slides in the 4th or 6th round you happen to like. Now you can't take him, b/c what do you need 4 starting RBs for when you only can start two. They should have taken Ward or Johnson instead of Faulk. With Faulk you have to use up two slots to guarantee production (Faulk and S. Jackson). Stephen Jackson is gonna go early too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 If WW selects Aaron Brooks again, I will leave the Huddle foreever... 352862[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Ah-HA! Ward it is! Way to go, WW! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackerFanX Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Hines Ward was the smart choice. He is a great posession receiver and had 157 balls thrown his way last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 I like the Ward pick. I prefer Chad Johnson, but not appreciably so. It's a wash, and th Huddle's draft is going well so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackerFanX Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 I am not impressed with FF Mastermind's and the Fantasy Guru's picks in the 3rd round. They already had their starting backfield and took backups in the 3rd round. They will have a long wait to grab a WR and they need to start 3 in this League. Maybe one of these teams took a RB in hopes of trading with the Fantasy Insights team who doesn't have a RB yet. Will KFFL take their 3rd RB next? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trots Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Ward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meat Face Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 I woulda taken Johnson...Kitna will be back in at QB once Palmer f's up enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLAYER Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 KFFL TOOK 3RD RB?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 good pick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Twinky Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Yup, KFFL realized that they took Bennett waaaay too early and needed another back to cover his azz incase RBBC takes over that situation. I actually have Martin ahead of Bennett on my list too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 It's amazing.... I mean really, it's freakin AMAZING.... even in a draft like this, someone makes an absolutely daft move, like Bennett at 2:08. There will ALWAYS be one, at least, in every draft, that makes my head start moving from side to side, involuntarilly. KFFL should be looking for a gun, a short one, that he could aim at his head..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spain Posted August 18, 2004 Author Share Posted August 18, 2004 I like the Ward pick in that spot. LT, Peyton Manning, and Hines Ward. I dont think the draft could have gone any better for the Huddle so far. 3 impact players that each have a legitimate shot at being the #1 ff scorer at his respective position. Now the pressure for selecting a player based on position is out of play and WW can sit back and take best available player. Sitting pretty good at this point.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackerFanX Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 KFFL TOOK 3RD RB?? 352993[/snapback] What are these guys thinking? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMD Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 that was one of the things I liked about the pick. With the RB-QB-WR start, it allows more best value picks and less "I gotta have regardless" picks. RB2 will be a little weaker but with LT already and pretty much only riskier RBs left anyway, I agree with the pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REZ Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Very nice start. I too like Johnson a bit more then Ward but certainly like the pick more then a reach to a rb here. It's better to be at the front of a run then chasing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PackerFanX Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 that was one of the things I liked about the pick. With the RB-QB-WR start, it allows more best value picks and less "I gotta have regardless" picks. RB2 will be a little weaker but with LT already and pretty much only riskier RBs left anyway, I agree with the pick. 353042[/snapback] With the RBs left I would consider fantasy football playoff schedule when picking your 2nd RB if you are on the fence about two different RBs. "Look at the ease of fantasy schedule article" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 that was one of the things I liked about the pick. With the RB-QB-WR start, it allows more best value picks and less "I gotta have regardless" picks. RB2 will be a little weaker but with LT already and pretty much only riskier RBs left anyway, I agree with the pick. 353042[/snapback] It's time to put your ear really close to the ground in Buffalo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulOttCarruth Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Ward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apathy Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Just a casual observation from somebody tuning in late and this may have been touched on already. Does it make sense to take Chris Brown as your RB2 (A. Green as RB1) when they have the same bye week? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.