skins Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 hey skins, you want steeler's team? 1309907[/snapback] That makes me sad. Why so hurtful? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDFFFreak Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 Fixed. 1309870[/snapback] Hey!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TDFFFreak Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 : Shoo. I'm not wasting my time trying to explain things to people like you who aren't going to listen anyway. 1309872[/snapback] Now you know how I felt in discussing Brokeback Mountain with some people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicCEO Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 hey skins, you want steeler's team? 1309907[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Like Soup Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 goodbye 1309885[/snapback] You had me at brokeback. hey skins, you want steeler's team? 1309907[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brewer Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 Just logged on, saw the title of this thread and haven't read to 10 pages of crapola. Let me guess, someone took there ball and went home? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 Just logged on, saw the title of this thread and haven't read to 10 pages of crapola. Let me guess, someone took there ball and went home? 1310008[/snapback] i wouldn't want to ruin the suspense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrobn26 Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 I LOVE JUDGE JUDY! 1309740[/snapback] If we had more Judge Judys, we'd have less of a need for Judge Judys!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 If we had more Judge Judys, we'd have less of a need for Judge Judys!!!! 1310018[/snapback] yeah, but what if i went into judge judy's courtroom with matlock at my attorney, who would win then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 yeah, but what if i went into judge judy's courtroom with matlock at my attorney, who would win then? 1310029[/snapback] Judge Judy would rip Matlock's head off and feed it to wolverines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrobn26 Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 yeah, but what if i went into judge judy's courtroom with matlock at my attorney, who would win then? 1310029[/snapback] Lawyers are not allowed in small claims court! Regardless, Judge Judy would squash his balls like 2 little grapes, and he'd sound like Gomer Pyle..."Citizens Arrest...Citizens Arrest!!!"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squeegiebo Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Maybe it is you that need to be listening to us, the unbiased fans of the NFL who say the refs screwed the Seahawks. Of course you are far to arrogant to do that. Just like in politics rather than admit you are wrong, you just try to sluff it off. 1309900[/snapback] I don't recall saying that the refs didn't screw the Seahawks. I agree that the Steelers got the benefit of just about every call. And I agree that everyone got screwed out of seeing a good game, because of the poor performances of both teams as well as the officiating. That doesn't mean that the Seahawks would have won if the calls had gone the other way. And it doesn't mean the Steelers have anything to be ashamed about, particularly Hines Ward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 I don't recall saying that the refs didn't screw the Seahawks. I agree that the Steelers got the benefit of just about every call. And I agree that everyone got screwed out of seeing a good game, because of the poor performances of both teams as well as the officiating. That doesn't mean that the Seahawks would have won if the calls had gone the other way. And it doesn't mean the Steelers have anything to be ashamed about, particularly Hines Ward. 1310056[/snapback] Squeegie, unfortunately, it is going to be a long time until the Seahawk fans let it go, and the Steelers are never going to get the credit they deserve. It is not the Steelers fault that the calls went their way. The Steelers just finished off one of the greatest runs in NFL history, and I'm over the controversy talk, and am truly enjoying the fact that the Steelers finally got the title that we fans have waited a long time for. I must say though, that the Steelers got ripped in a much bigger way against the Colts, and overcame the tough breaks and still won the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicCEO Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 I must say though, that the Steelers got ripped in a much bigger way against the Colts, and overcame the tough breaks and still won the game. 1310095[/snapback] True. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bier Meister Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 I don't recall saying that the refs didn't screw the Seahawks. I agree that the Steelers got the benefit of just about every call. And I agree that everyone got screwed out of seeing a good game, because of the poor performances of both teams as well as the officiating. That doesn't mean that the Seahawks would have won if the calls had gone the other way. And it doesn't mean the Steelers have anything to be ashamed about, particularly Hines Ward. 1310056[/snapback] agree with everything you just posted. but when people say "score board! deal with it!" .... that doesn't tell the whole story and is insulting to those with any knowledge of football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 I must say though, that the Steelers got ripped in a much bigger way against the Colts, and overcame the tough breaks and still won the game. 1310095[/snapback] well, no, they didn't get ripped in a bigger way. they definitely got ripped...maybe equally if anything. and no, they themselves didn't "overcome the tough breaks". they needed nick harper turning the wrong way and vanderjagt missing an easy kick, otherwise they're on the golf course a month ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heydave76 Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 I must say though, that the Steelers got ripped in a much bigger way against the Colts, and overcame the tough breaks and still whined about it. 1310095[/snapback] true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justin Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 The Huddler's Refuge........need a new member. 1308865[/snapback] Dam.n, first Cheez, now steeler! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 I must say though, that the Steelers got ripped in a much bigger way against the Colts, and overcame the tough breaks and still won the game. 1310095[/snapback] Really? I don't think so at all. In the Colts game there were 2 missed PI calls against the Colts and the overturned INT. But the Steelers also got away with a PI on third down on the Colts first drive and the bogus no call on the Steelers false start when they were trying to run the clock. The refs just replayed the down and didn't call anything. It was more one-sided Pittsburgh's way last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 This will go on until June. Remember when the Pats beat the Rams? How long did we hear about the need to put one second back on the clock after Vinatieri's game winning FG because so many believed the refs intentionally let it run to zero after the ball cleared te uprights? You can't have a perfectly officiated game. As for any "fix" keep in mind that so much $$$$ was bet on the steelers in Vegas that their victory cost that town's casino's mucho payola this weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 This will go on until June. Remember when the Pats beat the Rams? How long did we hear about the need to put one second back on the clock after Vinatieri's game winning FG because so many believed the refs intentionally let it run to zero after the ball cleared te uprights? You can't have a perfectly officiated game. As for any "fix" keep in mind that so much $$$$ was bet on the steelers in Vegas that their victory cost that town's casino's mucho payola this weekend. 1310142[/snapback] It was all the fricken defensive holding that the stinkin Pats did...and thanks for opening up THAT old wound... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Like Soup Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Judge Judy would rip Matlock's head off and feed it to wolverines. 1310033[/snapback] I think Matlock would counter with the Grizzly Man... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retrograde assault Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 (edited) If a guy with a lower member number than me quits, does my member number drop by one? Edited February 7, 2006 by Retrograde assault Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Really? I don't think so at all. In the Colts game there were 2 missed PI calls against the Colts and the overturned INT. But the Steelers also got away with a PI on third down on the Colts first drive and the bogus no call on the Steelers false start when they were trying to run the clock. The refs just replayed the down and didn't call anything. It was more one-sided Pittsburgh's way last night. 1310123[/snapback] More one-sided yes, but, I was referring to the degree of the missed call. None last night were as blatant as the Polamalu INT, imho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 If a guy with a lower member number than me quits, does my member number drop by one? 1310227[/snapback] No. Pratts lost his #12 due to some snafu. So #12 is now undefined and all other numbers remained the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts